1.Heart Disease and Occupational Risk Factors in the Canadian Population: An Exploratory Study Using the Canadian Community Health Survey.
Behdin NOWROUZI-KIA ; Anson K C LI ; Christine NGUYEN ; Jennifer CASOLE
Safety and Health at Work 2018;9(2):144-148
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to find temporal trends in the associations between cardiovascular disease and occupational risk factors in the context of the Canadian population. METHODS: Population data were analyzed from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) collected between 2001 and 2014 for trends over time between heart disease and various occupational risk factors: hours worked, physical exertion at work, and occupation type (management/arts/education, business/finance, sales/services, trades/transportations, and primary industry/processing). RESULTS: We found no significant difference in the average number of hours worked/wk between individuals who report having heart disease in all years of data except in 2011 (F 1,96 = 7.02, p = 0.009) and 2012 (F 1,96 = 8.86, p = 0.004). We also found a significant difference in the degree of physical exertion at work in 2001 (F 1,79 = 7.45, p = 0.008). There were statistically significant results of occupation type on self-reported heart disease from 2003 to 2014. CONCLUSION: Canadian data from the CCHS do not exhibit a trend toward an association between heart disease and the number of hours worked/wk. There is an association between heart disease and physical exertion at work, but the trend is inconsistent. The data indicate a trend toward an association between heart disease and occupation type, but further analysis is required to determine which occupation type may be associated with heart disease.
Cardiovascular Diseases
;
Health Surveys*
;
Heart Diseases*
;
Heart*
;
Occupational Health
;
Occupations
;
Physical Exertion
;
Risk Factors*
2.Emergency department patient experience: Same location, same provider, different scores by different survey methods
Wirachin Hoonpongsimanont ; Preet Kaur Sahota ; Yanjun Chen ; Maria Nguyen ; Christine Louis ; Jonathan Pena ; Andrew Wong ; Maxwell Jen
World Journal of Emergency Medicine 2019;10(3):138-144
BACKGROUND:
Recent findings on emergency department (ED) patient experience surveys and concerns for the low response rates challenge the quality and reliability of the survey reports. We assessed the consistency of an ED patient experience survey report and identified the effects of patient demographics on ED patient experiences.
METHODS:
We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study at a university-based ED from July to December 2017. We obtained ED patient experience scores from an institutional version (IS) survey and the Press Ganey Associates-distributed survey (PGA). We compared top box scores from the two reports using frequency analysis and performed multivariable logistic regressions to identify associations between IS patient demographics and scores.
RESULTS:
We obtained 289 PGA and 234 IS responses. The IS reported significant, higher top box scores in doctor-specific patient questions compared to PGA (all four P-values < 0.01). Female, Christian and White patients were more likely to give top box scores (OR 3.07, OR 2.22 and OR 2.41, P-value < 0.05, respectively).
CONCLUSION
We found significant differences in ED patient experience scores between the IS and PGA surveys. We recommend that healthcare providers consider patient demographic variables when interpreting ED experience score reports. Multiple survey techniques and distribution methods may be adopted to best capture ED patient experiences.
3.Controversy and Consensus on the Management of Elevated Sperm DNA Fragmentation in Male Infertility: A Global Survey, Current Guidelines, and Expert Recommendations
Ala’a FARKOUH ; Ashok AGARWAL ; Taha Abo-Almagd Abdel-Meguid HAMODA ; Parviz KAVOUSSI ; Ramadan SALEH ; Armand ZINI ; Mohamed ARAFA ; Ahmed M. HARRAZ ; Murat GUL ; Vilvapathy Senguttuvan KARTHIKEYAN ; Damayanthi DURAIRAJANAYAGAM ; Amarnath RAMBHATLA ; Florence BOITRELLE ; Eric CHUNG ; Ponco BIROWO ; Tuncay TOPRAK ; Ramy Abou GHAYDA ; Rossella CANNARELLA ; Nguyen Ho Vinh PHUOC ; Fotios DIMITRIADIS ; Giorgio I. RUSSO ; Ioannis SOKOLAKIS ; Taymour MOSTAFA ; Konstantinos MAKAROUNIS ; Imad ZIOUZIOU ; Shinnosuke KURODA ; Marion BENDAYAN ; Raneen Sawaid KAIYAL ; Andrian JAPARI ; Mara SIMOPOULOU ; Lucia ROCCO ; Nicolas GARRIDO ; Nazim GHERABI ; Kadir BOCU ; Oguzhan KAHRAMAN ; Tan V. LE ; Christine WYNS ; Kelton TREMELLEN ; Selcuk SARIKAYA ; Sheena LEWIS ; Donald P. EVENSON ; Edmund KO ; Aldo E. CALOGERO ; Fahmi BAHAR ; Marlon MARTINEZ ; Andrea CRAFA ; Quang NGUYEN ; Rafael F. AMBAR ; Giovanni COLPI ; Mustafa Emre BAKIRCIOGLU
The World Journal of Men's Health 2023;41(4):809-847
Purpose:
Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) has been associated with male infertility and poor outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART). The purpose of this study was to investigate global practices related to the management of elevated SDF in infertile men, summarize the relevant professional society recommendations, and provide expert recommendations for managing this condition.
Materials and Methods:
An online global survey on clinical practices related to SDF was disseminated to reproductive clinicians, according to the CHERRIES checklist criteria. Management protocols for various conditions associated with SDF were captured and compared to the relevant recommendations in professional society guidelines and the appropriate available evidence. Expert recommendations and consensus on the management of infertile men with elevated SDF were then formulated and adapted using the Delphi method.
Results:
A total of 436 experts from 55 different countries submitted responses. As an initial approach, 79.1% of reproductive experts recommend lifestyle modifications for infertile men with elevated SDF, and 76.9% prescribe empiric antioxidants. Regarding antioxidant duration, 39.3% recommend 4–6 months and 38.1% recommend 3 months. For men with unexplained or idiopathic infertility, and couples experiencing recurrent miscarriages associated with elevated SDF, most respondents refer to ART 6 months after failure of conservative and empiric medical management. Infertile men with clinical varicocele, normal conventional semen parameters, and elevated SDF are offered varicocele repair immediately after diagnosis by 31.4%, and after failure of antioxidants and conservative measures by 40.9%. Sperm selection techniques and testicular sperm extraction are also management options for couples undergoing ART. For most questions, heterogenous practices were demonstrated.
Conclusions
This paper presents the results of a large global survey on the management of infertile men with elevated SDF and reveals a lack of consensus among clinicians. Furthermore, it demonstrates the scarcity of professional society guidelines in this regard and attempts to highlight the relevant evidence. Expert recommendations are proposed to help guide clinicians.