1.A critical assessment of the medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw classification in stage I patients: a retrospective analysis
Oliver RISTOW ; Lena HÜRTGEN ; Julius MORATIN ; Maximilian SMIELOWSKI ; Christian FREUDLSPERGER ; Michael ENGEL ; Jürgen HOFFMANN ; Thomas RÜCKSCHLOSS
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2021;47(2):99-111
Objectives:
It is unclear whether the extent of intraoral mucosa defects in patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw indicates disease severity. Therefore, this study investigated whether mucosal lesions correlate with the true extent of osseous defects in stage I patients.
Materials and Methods:
Retrospectively, all patients with stage I medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw who underwent surgical treatment between April 2018 and April 2019 were enrolled. Preoperatively, the extent of their mucosal lesions was measured in clinical evaluations, and patients were assigned to either the visible or the probeable bone group. Intraoperatively, the extent of necrosis was measured manually and with fluorescence.
Results:
Fifty-five patients (36 female, 19 male) with 86 lesions (46 visible bone, 40 probeable bone) were enrolled. Intraoperatively, the necrotic lesions were significantly larger (P<0.001) than the preoperative mucosal lesions in both groups. A significant (P<0.05) but very weak (R 2 <0.2) relationship was noted between the extent of the mucosal lesions and the necrotic bone area.
Conclusion
Preoperative mucosal defects (visible or probeable) in patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw do not indicate the extent of bone necrosis or disease severity.
2.A critical assessment of the medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw classification in stage I patients: a retrospective analysis
Oliver RISTOW ; Lena HÜRTGEN ; Julius MORATIN ; Maximilian SMIELOWSKI ; Christian FREUDLSPERGER ; Michael ENGEL ; Jürgen HOFFMANN ; Thomas RÜCKSCHLOSS
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2021;47(2):99-111
Objectives:
It is unclear whether the extent of intraoral mucosa defects in patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw indicates disease severity. Therefore, this study investigated whether mucosal lesions correlate with the true extent of osseous defects in stage I patients.
Materials and Methods:
Retrospectively, all patients with stage I medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw who underwent surgical treatment between April 2018 and April 2019 were enrolled. Preoperatively, the extent of their mucosal lesions was measured in clinical evaluations, and patients were assigned to either the visible or the probeable bone group. Intraoperatively, the extent of necrosis was measured manually and with fluorescence.
Results:
Fifty-five patients (36 female, 19 male) with 86 lesions (46 visible bone, 40 probeable bone) were enrolled. Intraoperatively, the necrotic lesions were significantly larger (P<0.001) than the preoperative mucosal lesions in both groups. A significant (P<0.05) but very weak (R 2 <0.2) relationship was noted between the extent of the mucosal lesions and the necrotic bone area.
Conclusion
Preoperative mucosal defects (visible or probeable) in patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw do not indicate the extent of bone necrosis or disease severity.
3.Head motion during cone-beam computed tomography: Analysis of frequency and influence on image quality
Julius MORATIN ; Moritz BERGER ; Thomas RÜCKSCHLOSS ; Karl METZGER ; Hannah BERGER ; Maximilian GOTTSAUNER ; Michael ENGEL ; Jürgen HOFFMANN ; Christian FREUDLSPERGER ; Oliver RISTOW
Imaging Science in Dentistry 2020;50(3):227-236
Purpose:
Image artifacts caused by patient motion cause problems in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) because they lead to distortion of the 3-dimensional reconstruction. This prospective study was performed to quantify patient movement during CBCT acquisition and its influence on image quality.
Materials and Methods:
In total, 412 patients receiving CBCT imaging were equipped with a wireless head sensor system that detected inertial, gyroscopic, and magnetometric movements with 6 dimensions of freedom. The type and amplitude of movements during CBCT acquisition were evaluated and image quality was rated in 7 different anatomical regions of interest. For continuous variables, significance was calculated using the Student t-test. A linear regression model was applied to identify associations of the type and extent of motion with image quality scores. Kappa statistics were used to assess intra- and inter-rater agreement. Chi-square testing was used to analyze the impact of age and sex on head movement.
Results:
All CBCT images were acquired in a 10-month period. In 24% of the investigations, movement was recorded (acceleration: >0.10 [m/s2 ]; angular velocity: >0.018 [°/s]). In all examined regions of interest, head motion during CBCT acquisition resulted in significant impairment of image quality (P<0.001). Movement in the horizontal and vertical axes was most relevant for image quality (R2>0.7).
Conclusion
Relevant head motions during CBCT imaging were frequently detected, leading to image quality loss and potentially impairing diagnosis and therapy planning. The presented data illustrate the need for digital correction algorithms and hardware to minimize motion artefacts in CBCT imaging.