OBJECTIVES: A number of investigators have examined the possible pathophysiological mechanisms in patients who died from asthma, but the reasons for the increased incidence of death in patients with asthma are largely unknown. To elucidate the risk factors and possible causes of fatal asthma, we reviewed the clinical data of patients with potentially fatal asthma(PFA). METHODS: We retrospectively studied the clinical and laboratory profiles of 35 PFA patients(43 episodes) who had been admitted at the Kyungpook University Hospital and Taegu Fatima Hospital in recent 5 years(1989. 7-1994. 6). Our criteria of PFA were defined as either respiratory arrest or an arterial carbon dioxide tension(PaCO2) greater than 50 mmHg or an altered state of consciousness, due to acute asthma. RESULTS: 1) Twenty four patients with PFA were female and 11 male. At the time of PFA episode, age distribution was between 16-65 year (42% between 36-49). 2) Seasonal distribution was 13 episodes between March and May, 13 June and August, 6 September and November, 11 December and February. 3) Previous hospitalization history due to asthmatic attack was noted in 81 percent, and 75 percent were relatively compliant to their therapy. 5) At visiting emergency room, 81 percent satisfied the criteria of PFA, whereas 19 percent during hospitalizatoin. 77 percent required mechanical ventilation, and 52 percent of them within 30 minutes after visiting. 6) Initial arterial blood gas analysis at emergency room showed marked hypercapnia(75 +/- 29 mmHg), hypoxemia(50 +/- mmHg) and acidosis(pH 7.14 +/- 0.15). Serum potassium levels were within normal ranges in 75 percent. 7) All, except one, showed no significant cardiac arrthymias. 8) Possible precipitating factors leading to PFA were respiratory tract infection in 31 episodes, ingestion of NSAIDs in 2, emotional upsets in 2, irritant air pollutions in 2, withdrawal of anti-asthma drugs in 1, and unknown causes in 5. 9) Nine of 16 patients were atopic, and majority of them showed positive reaction to Dermatophagoides antigen. CONCLUSIONS: These results may suggest that PFA is mainly due to airway obstruction, and upper respiratory infection is an important precipitating factor leading to PFA. It is necessary to establish an appropriate plan for preventing PFA and related deaths.
Age Distribution ; Air Pollution ; Airway Obstruction ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal ; Asthma* ; Blood Gas Analysis ; Carbon Dioxide ; Consciousness ; Daegu ; Eating ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Female ; Gyeongsangbuk-do ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Potassium ; Precipitating Factors ; Pyroglyphidae ; Reference Values ; Research Personnel ; Respiration, Artificial ; Respiratory Tract Infections ; Retrospective Studies* ; Risk Factors ; Seasons

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and analgesic efficacy of polmacoxib 2 mg versus placebo in a superiority comparison or versus celecoxib 200 mg in a noninferiority comparison in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: This study was a 6-week, phase III, randomized, double-blind, and parallel-group trial followed by an 18-week, single arm, open-label extension. Of the 441 patients with knee or hip OA screened, 362 were randomized; 324 completed 6 weeks of treatment and 220 completed the extension. Patients were randomized to receive oral polmacoxib 2 mg (n = 146), celecoxib 200 mg (n = 145), or placebo (n = 71) once daily for 6 weeks. During the extension, all participants received open-label polmacoxib 2 mg. The primary endpoint was the change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC)-pain subscale score from baseline to week 6. Secondary endpoints included WOMAC-OA Index, OA subscales (pain, stiffness, and physical function) and Physician's and Subject's Global Assessments at weeks 3 and 6. Other outcome measures included adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiograms, and physical examinations. RESULTS: After 6 weeks, the polmacoxib-placebo treatment difference was −2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], −4.4 to −0.6; p = 0.011) and the polmacoxib-celecoxib treatment difference was 0.6 (CI, −0.9 to 2.2; p = 0.425). According to Physician's Global Assessments, more subjects were “much improved” at week 3 with polmacoxib than with celecoxib or placebo. Gastrointestinal and general disorder AEs occurred with a greater frequency with polmacoxib or celecoxib than with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Polmacoxib 2 mg was relatively well tolerated and demonstrated efficacy superior to placebo and noninferior to celecoxib after 6 weeks of treatment in patients with OA. The results obtained during the 18-week trial extension with polmacoxib 2 mg were consistent with those observed during the 6-week treatment period, indicating that polmacoxib can be considered safe for long-term use based on this relatively small scale of study in a Korean population. More importantly, the results of this study showed that polmacoxib has the potential to be used as a pain relief drug with reduced gastrointestinal side effects compared to traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for OA.
Arm ; Celecoxib* ; Electrocardiography ; Hip ; Humans ; Knee ; Ontario ; Osteoarthritis* ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Physical Examination ; Vital Signs

A 45-year-old woman diagnosed with breast cancer reported disease progression in the form of metastatic lung and recurrent breast lesions following chemotherapy and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy. The patient underwent 64 Cu-tetra-azacyclododecanetetra-acetic acid (DOTA)-trastuzumab positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to evaluate the HER2 expression status.64 Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab accumulated in the left breast and lymph nodes but not in the lung lesions. Following trastuzumab emtansine treatment, there was a significant improvement in the lesions with 64 Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab accumulation. However, the lesions that did not accumulate 64 Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab aggravated. Therefore, it was concluded that 64 CuDOTA-trastuzumab PET/CT can be used to predict the outcome of HER2-targeted treatment by evaluating HER2 expression in breast cancer patients.

Remission is a primary end point of in clinical practice and trials of treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The 2011 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) remission criteria were developed to provide a consensus definition of remission. This study aimed to assess the concordance between the new remission criteria and the physician’s clinical judgment of remission and also to identify factors that affect the discordance between these two approaches. A total of 3,209 patients with RA were included from the KORean Observational Study Network for Arthritis (KORONA) database. The frequency of remission was evaluated based on each approach. The agreement between the results was estimated by Cohen's kappa (κ). Patients with remission according to the 2011 ACR/EULAR criteria (i.e. the Boolean criteria) and/or physician judgment (n = 855) were divided into three groups: concordant remission, the Boolean criteria only, and physician judgment only. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors responsible for the assignment of patients with remission to one of the discordant groups rather than the concordant group. The remission rates using the Boolean criteria and physician judgment were 10.5% and 19.9%, respectively. The agreement between two approaches for remission was low (κ = 0.226) and the concordant remission rate was only 5.5% (n = 177). Pain affected classification in both discordant groups, whereas fatigue was associated with remission only by physician clinical judgment. The Boolean criteria were more stringent than clinical judgment. Patient subjective symptoms such as pain and fatigue were associated with discordance between the two approaches.
Arthritis ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid* ; Classification ; Consensus ; Fatigue ; Humans ; Judgment* ; Logistic Models ; Observational Study ; Rheumatic Diseases

In this article, on page 230, Fig. 2A needs to be corrected.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We compared the efficacy and safety of valsartan and rosuvastatin combination therapy with each treatment alone in hypercholesterolemic hypertensive patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients who met inclusion criteria were randomized to receive 1 of the following 2-month drug regimens: valsartan 160 mg plus rosuvastatin 20 mg, valsartan 160 mg plus placebo, or rosuvastatin 20 mg plus placebo. The primary efficacy variables were change in sitting diastolic blood pressure (sitDBP) and sitting systolic blood pressure (sitSBP), and percentage change in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) in the combination, valsartan, and rosuvastatin groups. Adverse events (AEs) during the study were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 354 patients were screened and 123 of them were finally randomized. Changes of sitDBP by least squares mean (LSM) were -11.1, -7.2, and -3.6 mm Hg, respectively, and was greater in the combination, as compared to both valsartan (p=0.02) and rosuvastatin (p<0.001). Changes of sitSBP by LSM were -13.2, -10.8, and -4.9 mm Hg, and was greater in the combination, as compared to rosuvastatin (p=0.006) and not valsartan (p=0.42). Percentage changes of LDL-C by LSM were -52, -4, and -47% in each group, and was greater in the combination, as compared to valsartan (p<0.001), similar to rosuvastatin (p=0.16). Most AEs were mild and resolved by the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Combination treatment with valsartan and rosuvastatin exhibited an additive blood pressure-lowering effect with acceptable tolerability, as compared to valsartan monotherapy. Its lipid lowering effect was similar to rosuvatatin monotherapy.
Blood Pressure ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Humans ; Least-Squares Analysis ; Rosuvastatin Calcium ; Valsartan

OBJECTIVE: Productivity loss was compared by 3-stage of disease activity and associations between higher disease activity and high productivity loss were identified. METHODS: Data were extracted from Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patient-reported Outcomes Research, which enrolled 2,000 RA patients (>20-year) on disease-modifying-antirheumatic-drugs (DMARDs) (≥6-month) from December 2012 to June 2013. This included 1,457 RA patients with the disease activity score (DAS-28-ESR) in their medical charts. Productivity loss in time and indirect cost was estimated using The World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ). Baseline characteristics and productivity loss outcomes were compared according to DAS-28-ESR groups. RESULTS: 84.4% were females, 54.2% had low DAS-28-ESR ( < 3.2), and 38.2% and 7.6% had moderate (3.2∼5.1) and high DAS-28-ESR (>5.1). Patients with moderate to high DAS-28-ESR had higher lost productivity time (LPT) and monthly costs of LPT than those with low DAS-28-ESR (time in hours: 110.0±58.4 vs. 132.4±57.2 vs. 71.5±52.0, p < 0.0001; monthly costs of LPT in 1,000 Korean won: 1,097±607 vs. 1,302±554 vs. 741±531, p < 0.0001). Multiple regression analyses revealed significant associations with high LPT in high (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=3.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.18∼6.87) and moderate DAS-28-ESR (adjusted OR=1.88, 95% CI: 1.41∼2.52) compared to low DAS-28-ESR. In addition, positive associations with high monthly costs of LPT were observed in high (adjusted OR=3.45, 95% CI: 1.98∼5.99) and moderate DAS-28-ESR (adjusted OR=1.93, 95% CI: 1.43∼2.54) compared to low DAS-28-ESR. CONCLUSION: Timely therapeutic strategies should be taken into consideration given that the RA patients with moderate to high DAS-28-ESR showed strong associations with high productivity loss for effective management of RA.
Arthritis, Rheumatoid* ; Efficiency* ; Female ; Humans ; Odds Ratio ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Work Performance ; World Health Organization