Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery appointed a Task Force to provide guidance on the implementation of a surgical treatment of oral cancer. MEDLINE databases were searched for articles on subjects related to “surgical management of oral cancer” published in English. Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. The quality of evidence was rated with use RoBANS (Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies) and AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews). Evidence-based recommendations for practice were ranked according to the American College of Physicians grading system. Additional directives are provided as expert opinions and Delphi questionnaire when insufficient evidence existed. The Committee developed 68 evidence-based recommendations in 34 categories intended to assist clinicians and patients and counselors, and health policy-makers. Proper surgical treatment selection for oral cancer, which is directed by patient- and subsite-specific factors, remains the greatest predictor of successful treatment outcomes. These guidelines are intended for use in conjunction with the individual patient's treatment goals.
Advisory Committees ; Bias (Epidemiology) ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; Counseling ; Expert Testimony ; Humans ; Mouth Neoplasms ; Neck ; Republic of Korea

Aspirin hypersensitivity is a hallmark of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), a clinical syndrome characterized by the severe inflammation of the respiratory tract after ingestion of cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitors. We investigated the capacity of aspirin to induce interleukin-4 (IL-4) production in inflammatory cells relevant to AERD pathogenesis and examined the associated biochemical and molecular pathways. We also compared IL-4 production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with AERD vs aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA) upon exposure to aspirin. Aspirin induced IL-4 expression and activated the IL-4 promoter in a report assay. The capacity of aspirin to induce IL-4 expression correlated with its activity to activate mitogen-activated protein kinases, to form DNA-protein complexes on P elements in the IL-4 promoter and to synthesize nuclear factor of activated T cells, critical transcription factors for IL-4 transcription. Of clinical importance, aspirin upregulated IL-4 production twice as much in PBMCs from patients with AERD compared with PBMCs from patients with ATA. Our results suggest that IL-4 is an inflammatory component mediating intolerance reactions to aspirin, and thus is crucial for AERD pathogenesis.
Aspirin* ; Asthma ; Cyclooxygenase 1 ; Eating ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Inflammation ; Interleukin-4* ; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases ; Negotiating ; Respiratory System ; T-Lymphocytes ; Transcription Factors

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is rarely performed under regional anesthesia because of pneumoperitoneum-related problems. We expected that dexmedetomidine would compensate for the problems arising from spinal anesthesia alone. Thus, we performed a feasibility study of spinal anesthesia with intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion. METHODS: Twenty-six patients undergoing LA received spinal anesthesia with intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion. During surgery, the patient's pain or discomfort was controlled by supplemental fentanyl or ketamine injection, and all adverse effects were evaluated. RESULTS: No patient required conversion to general anesthesia, and all operations were completed laparoscopically without conversion to open surgery. Seventeen (65.4%) patients required supplemental injection of fentanyl or ketamine. Bradycardia occurred in seven (26.9%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia with dexmedetomidine infusion may be feasible for LA. However, additional analgesia, sedation, and careful attention to the potential development of bradycardia are needed for a successful anesthetic outcome.
Analgesia ; Anesthesia, Conduction ; Anesthesia, General ; Anesthesia, Spinal* ; Appendectomy* ; Bradycardia ; Conversion to Open Surgery ; Dexmedetomidine* ; Feasibility Studies ; Fentanyl ; Humans ; Ketamine

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is rarely performed under regional anesthesia because of pneumoperitoneum-related problems. We expected that dexmedetomidine would compensate for the problems arising from spinal anesthesia alone. Thus, we performed a feasibility study of spinal anesthesia with intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion. METHODS: Twenty-six patients undergoing LA received spinal anesthesia with intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion. During surgery, the patient's pain or discomfort was controlled by supplemental fentanyl or ketamine injection, and all adverse effects were evaluated. RESULTS: No patient required conversion to general anesthesia, and all operations were completed laparoscopically without conversion to open surgery. Seventeen (65.4%) patients required supplemental injection of fentanyl or ketamine. Bradycardia occurred in seven (26.9%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia with dexmedetomidine infusion may be feasible for LA. However, additional analgesia, sedation, and careful attention to the potential development of bradycardia are needed for a successful anesthetic outcome.
Analgesia ; Anesthesia, Conduction ; Anesthesia, General ; Anesthesia, Spinal* ; Appendectomy* ; Bradycardia ; Conversion to Open Surgery ; Dexmedetomidine* ; Feasibility Studies ; Fentanyl ; Humans ; Ketamine

BACKGROUND: Olmesartan medoxomil is an angiotensin II receptor blocker commonly used in hypertension. First objective of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two olmesartan formulations, Olmesartan 20 mg and 40 mg tablet (Yuhan, Pharmaceutical Corp. Seoul, Korea) as test drugs and Olmetec(R) 20 mg and 40 mg tablet (Daewoong, Pharmaceutical Corp. Seoul, Korea) as reference drugs. Second objective of this study was to evaluate the dose-proportionality of two formulations. METHODS: Two studies (20 mg, 40 mg) were conducted as a randomized, open-label, 2-period, crossover design. Each subject received one 20 mg or 40 mg tablet of the reference or test formulation of olmesartan medoxomil in each study. Blood samples were obtained during the 48-hour period after the dose in each treatment period. Wash-out period was 1 week in each study. Concentrations of olmesartan medoxomil in plasma were analyzed using a liquid chromatography system with tandem mass-spectrometric detection (LC/MS/MS). The primary pharmacokinetic parameters were Cmax (maximum concentration) and AUCt (area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last sampling time). RESULTS: A total number of 40 healthy male volunteers participated in the study and 37 volunteers completed both treatment periods in 20 mg trial. All 40 participants completed both treatment periods in 40 mg trial. The 90 % CIs for the geometric mean ratios of the pharmacokinetic parameters (test:reference drug) were 0.93 ~ 1.04 for AUCt and 0.97 ~ 1.08 for Cmax in 20 mg trial. The 90 CIs were 0.94 ~ 1.02 for AUCt and 1.00 ~ 1.11 for Cmax in 40 mg trial. All parameters of two studies satisfy the range of bioequivalence criterion. CONCLUSION: The obtained results indicated that pharmacokinetic exposure to Olmesartan 20 mg and 40 mg tablet was bioequivalent to that of Olmetec(R) 20 mg and 40 mg tablet, respectively.
Chromatography, Liquid ; Cross-Over Studies ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Imidazoles ; Male ; Plasma ; Receptors, Angiotensin ; Tetrazoles ; Therapeutic Equivalency

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although a small amount of fecal material can obscure significant colorectal lesions, it has not been well documented whether bowel preparation status affects the missing risk of colorectal polyps and adenomas during a colonoscopy. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients with one to nine colorectal polyps and at least one adenoma of >5 mm in size at the screening colonoscopy. Tandem colonoscopy with polypectomy was carried out within 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 277 patients with 942 polyps and 714 adenomas completed index and tandem examinations. At the index colonoscopy, 187 polyps (19.9%) and 127 adenomas (17.8%) were missed. The per-patient miss rate of polyps and adenomas increased significantly as the bowel cleansing rate declined from excellent to poor/inadequate on the Aronchick scale (polyps, p=0.024; adenomas, p=0.040). The patients with poor/inadequate bowel preparation were independently associated with an increased risk of having missed polyps (odds ratio [OR], 3.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13 to 9.15) or missed adenomas (OR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.04 to 8.88) compared to the patients with excellent bowel preparation. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of missing polyps and adenomas during screening colonoscopy is significantly affected by bowel preparation status. It seems appropriate to shorten the colonoscopy follow-up interval for patients with suboptimal bowel preparation.
Adenoma ; Colonoscopy ; Humans ; Mass Screening ; Polyps ; Prospective Studies

Propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) is an ultrashort-acting sedative agent with sedative and amnestic effects that is used not only for anesthesia but also for sedation during minor outpatient procedures and endoscopic examinations. Rare cases of anaphylaxis following propofol administration have been reported in the medical literature. Documentation of anaphylaxis is often lacking because the cause and effect relationship is often hard to prove. Only a minority of patients get referred for allergy testing to confirm the offending drug. Here we report a 74-year-old woman who had an anaphylactic reaction with severe oropharyngeal edema and bronchospasm for a few minutes after receiving propofol during endoscopic examination. An allergy skin test was positive for both propofol and soybean. Soybean in the intralipid is one component of propofol, and we concluded that this anaphylaxis was caused by soybean.
Aged ; Anaphylaxis ; Anesthesia ; Angioedema ; Bronchial Spasm ; Edema ; Emulsions ; Female ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Outpatients ; Phospholipids ; Propofol ; Skin Tests ; Soybean Oil ; Soybeans

BACKGROUND: Up to now, lobectomy, bilobectomy and pneumonectomy combined with extensive lymph node dissection have been regarded as the standard procedures for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In high-risk patients, however, limited resection (LR) has been attempted as a salvage procedure, and, recently, indication for LR has been extended to selected cases with early-stage NSCLC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Among the 773 patients who underwent surgical procedures for NSCLC in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from May 2003 to December 2008, 43 patients received LR. Medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Mean age at operation was 66.0+/-12.4 years, and there were 30 males. Twenty-five patients underwent conservative limited resection (CLR) and 18 underwent intentional limited resection (ILR). Indications for CLR were multiple primary lung cancer in 9 (9/25, 36%) and severe concomitant diseases in 5 (5/25, 20%). Of these, 6 patients underwent segmentectomy and 19 received wedge resection. During the follow-up period of 28.0+/-17.8 months, 15 patient developed recurrent lung cancer. ILR was selectively performed in lesions almost purely composed of ground glass opacity (> or =95%), or in small solid lesions (< or =2 cm). Of these, 11 patients underwent segmentectomy and 7 underwent wedge resection. During the follow-up period of 31.7+/-11.6 months, no patient developed recurrence. CONCLUSION: Intermediate-term outcome of LR for early-stage lung cancer is comparable to that of standard operation. For the delineation of the indications and appropriate surgical techniques for LR, prospective randomized multi-institutional study may be expedient.
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glass ; Humans ; Lung ; Lung Neoplasms ; Lymph Node Excision ; Male ; Mastectomy, Segmental ; Medical Records ; Pneumonectomy ; Retrospective Studies

Delftia acidovarans is aerobic, nonfermentative Gram-negative rod commonly found in soil and water. Generally it is nonpathogenic but it unusually can cause bacteremia in immunocompromised patients. We present a case of peritonitis due to D. acidovorans in a patient on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. A 75-year-old woman was admitted with abdominal pain and cloudy peritoneal effluent. She was empirically treated with intraperitoneal (IP) cefazolin and ceftazidime, and then IP ceftazidime and oral ciprofloxacin, but peritonitis did not improve. Seven days after admission, D. acidovorans was identified from the peritoneal effluent, which was sensitive to amikacin, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin and imipenem. Catheter removal was considered with regard to poor response to adequate antibiotics; however, 4 days after changing to IP imipenem/cilastatin, abdominal pain, the leukocyte count of peritoneal effluent and C-reactive protein decreased. She was treated with imipenem/cilastatin for two weeks and discharged with the dialysis catheter intact.
Abdominal Pain ; Aged ; Amikacin ; Bacteremia ; C-Reactive Protein ; Catheters ; Cefazolin ; Ceftazidime ; Ciprofloxacin ; Delftia ; Delftia acidovorans ; Dialysis ; Female ; Humans ; Imipenem ; Immunocompromised Host ; Leukocyte Count ; Peritoneal Dialysis ; Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory ; Peritonitis ; Soil

BACKGROUND: Our study group established "3H care" in 2002. The meaning of "3H care" attain and maintain adequate controls over hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetic patients. This study evaluated the achievement of target goals after one year or more of "3H care" by specialists in our diabetic clinic. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 200 type 2 diabetic patients who received "3H care" for one year or more in our diabetic clinic. We evaluated achievement of target goals for metabolic controls as suggested by the American Diabetes Association. RESULTS: Overall, 200 type 2 diabetes patients were enrolled, of whom 106 were males (53%) and 94 were females (47%). After one year of "3H care," the mean HbA1c was 7.2+/-1.5% and the percentage of patients achieving glycemic control (HbA1c <7%) was 51.8%. However only 32.2% of hypertensive patients achieved the recommended target. After one year of "3H care," the percentages of those who achieved the target value for dyslipidemia were 80.0% for total cholesterol, 66.3% for low density lipoprotein cholesterol, 57.9% for triglyceride, and 51.8% for high density lipoprotein cholesterol. The percentage that achieved all three targets level was only 4.4% after one year and 14.8% after two years. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that only a minor proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes achieved the recommended goals despite the implementation of "3H care." It is our suggestion that better treatment strategies and methods should be used to control hypertension, hyperlipidemia and hyperglycemia.
Achievement ; Cholesterol ; Cholesterol, HDL ; Cholesterol, LDL ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Disease Management ; Dyslipidemias ; Female ; Humans ; Hyperglycemia ; Hyperlipidemias ; Hypertension ; Lipoproteins ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Specialization ; Treatment Outcome