3.Perforated Early Gastric Cancer: Uncommon and Easily Missed a Case Report and Review of Literature.
Raymond Hon Giat LIM ; Clifton Ming TAY ; Benjamin WONG ; Choon Seng CHONG ; Koji KONO ; Jimmy Bok Yan SO ; Asim SHABBIR
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2013;13(1):65-68
Gastric carcinoma rarely presents as a perforation, but when it does, is perceived as advanced disease. The majority of such perforations are Stage III/IV disease. A T1 gastric carcinoma has never been reported to perforate spontaneously in English literature. We present a 56 year-old Chinese male who presented with a perforated gastric ulcer. Intra-operatively, there was no suspicion of malignancy. At operation, an open omental patch repair was performed. Post-operative endoscopy revealed a macroscopic Type 0~III tumour and from the ulcer edge biopsy was reported as adenocarcinoma. Subsequently, the patient underwent open subtotal gastrectomy and formal D2 lymphadenectomy. The final histopathology report confirms T1b N0 disease. The occurrence of a perforated early gastric cancer re-emphasises the need for vigilance, including intra-operative frozen section and/or biopsy, as well as routine post-operative endoscopy for all patients.
Adenocarcinoma
;
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Biopsy
;
Endoscopy
;
Frozen Sections
;
Gastrectomy
;
Humans
;
Lymph Node Excision
;
Male
;
Peritonitis
;
Stomach Neoplasms
;
Stomach Ulcer
;
Ulcer
4.Does pulmonary metastasectomy of colorectal metastases translate to better survival? A systematic review.
Kai Yin LEE ; Jerrald LAU ; Bei En SIEW ; Yong Kang CHUA ; Yi Xuan LIM ; Xin Yi LIM ; Choon Seng CHONG ; Ker Kan TAN
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2021;50(10):773-781
INTRODUCTION:
Surgical resection of the primary and metastatic tumour is increasingly recommended in suitable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). While the role of metastasectomy is well studied and established in colorectal liver metastasis, evidence remains limited in pulmonary metastases. This systematic review was conducted to examine the current evidence on the role of lung metastasectomy (LUM) in CRC.
METHODS:
Three databases were systematically searched, to identify studies that compared survival outcomes of LUM, and factors that affected decision for LUM.
RESULTS:
From a total of 5,477 records, 6 studies were eventually identified. Two papers reported findings from one randomised controlled trial and 4 were retrospective reviews. There was no clear survival benefit in patients who underwent LUM compared to those who did not. When compared against patients who underwent liver metastasectomy, there was also no clear survival benefit. Patients who underwent LUM were also more likely to have a single pulmonary tumour, and metachronous disease.
CONCLUSION
The evidence suggests a role for LUM, but is limited by inherent selection bias in retrospective reviews, and the single randomised clinical trial performed was not completed. More prospective studies are required to understand the true effect of LUM on outcomes in metastatic CRC.
Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Humans
;
Liver Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Lung Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Metastasectomy
;
Pneumonectomy
;
Prognosis
;
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Survival Rate
5.Shellfish/crustacean oral allergy syndrome among national service pre-enlistees in Singapore
Bernard Yu Hor THONG ; Shalini ARULANANDAM ; Sze Chin TAN ; Teck Choon TAN ; Grace Yin Lai CHAN ; Justina Wei Lyn TAN ; Mark Chong Wei YEOW ; Chwee Ying TANG ; Jinfeng HOU ; Khai Pang LEONG
Asia Pacific Allergy 2018;8(2):e18-
BACKGROUND: All Singaporean males undergo medical screening prior to compulsory military service. A history of possible food allergy may require referral to a specialist Allergy clinic to ensure that special dietary needs can be taken into account during field training and deployment. OBJECTIVE: To study the pattern of food allergy among pre-enlistees who were referred to a specialist allergy clinic to work up suspected food allergy. METHODS: Retrospective study of all pre-enlistees registered in the Clinical Immunology/Allergy New Case Registry referred to the Allergy Clinic from 1 August 2015 to 31 May 2016 for suspected food allergy. RESULTS: One hundred twenty pre-enlistees reporting food allergy symptoms other than rash alone were referred to the Allergy Clinic during the study period. Of these, 77 (64.2%) had food allergy. Among those with food allergy, mean age was 19.1 ± 1.5 years. They comprised predominantly Chinese (66.2%) and Malays (20.8%). The most commonly reported foods were shellfish/crustaceans (78%), peanut (15.6%), and egg (6.5%). Self-limiting oral allergy syndrome, OAS (itchy lips and throat with/without lip angioedema) was the most common manifestation (n = 33, 42.9%) followed by anaphylaxis (n = 23, 29.9%). Majority of OAS was from shellfish/crustacean (90.6%); of which shrimp (30.3%), crab (15.2%), and lobster (3.0%) were the most common. Mild childhood asthma (69.7%), allergic rhinitis (6.3%), and eczema (6.1%) were the most common atopic conditions among individuals with shellfish/crustacean OAS. This pattern was similar for shellfish/crustacean anaphylaxis. Skin prick tests were most commonly positive for shrimp (OAS 87.1% vs. anaphylaxis 100%), crab (OAS 95.8% vs. 90.9%), and lobster (OAS 91.7% vs. 63.6%). CONCLUSION: OAS to shellfish/crustaceans was more common than anaphylaxis among this study population of young males referred for food allergy symptoms other than rash alone.
Anaphylaxis
;
Arachis
;
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Asthma
;
Eczema
;
Exanthema
;
Food Hypersensitivity
;
Humans
;
Hypersensitivity
;
Lip
;
Male
;
Mass Screening
;
Military Personnel
;
Ovum
;
Pharynx
;
Referral and Consultation
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Rhinitis, Allergic
;
Shellfish
;
Singapore
;
Skin
;
Specialization
6.Antiphospholipid and other autoantibodies in COVID-19 patients: A Singapore series.
Khai Pang LEONG ; Carol Yee Leng NG ; Bingwen Eugene FAN ; Chien Mei LOH ; Lok To WONG ; Valerie Hui Hian GOH ; Gwen Li Xuan TAN ; Chong Rui CHUA ; Janet Suyun TAN ; Samuel Shang Ming LEE ; Xin Rong LIM ; Teck Choon TAN
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2022;51(9):586-588