1.Clinical application of carbon nanoparticles lymphatic tracer technology to guide surgery for gallbladder cancer
Deyu LI ; Senmao MU ; Liancai WANG ; Yafeng WANG ; Chongyang LOU ; Erwei XIAO ; Pengfei SHI
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery 2016;22(8):537-541
Objective To study carbon nanoparticles lymphatic tracer to guide surgery for gallbladder cancer.Methods 120 patients with gallbladder cancer were randomized into two groups:the experimental group (n =60) and the control group (n =60).For the experimental group,0.1 ml carbon nanoparticles was injected at 4 ~ 6 locations subserosally around the cancerous site intraoperatively.Stained lymph nodes were used as markers to guide lymphadenectomy.The resected specimens were carefully dissected,and then the lymph nodes were studied according to their positions by histopathological examinations.Results Various degrees of stained lymph nodes were seen in the specimens.In the experimental group,the number of lymph nodes (12.0 ± 3.8),and metastatic lymph nodes (6.3 ± 3.3) per patient were obviously higher than those in the control group (9.2 ± 3.6、4.4 ± 2.8),respectively,(P < 0.05).There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in postoperative disease-free survival and overall survival.Conclusions Intraoperative injection of carbon nanoparticles enhanced lymph node clearance and increased the number of lymph nodes and metastatic lymph nodes dissected,which helped to guide pathological staging.There were significant improvements in disease-free survival and overall survival of these patients with gallbladder cancer after surgery.
2.Application value of nano carbon lymph tracing technique in the radical resection of gallbladder cancer:a prospective study
Senmao MU ; Liancai WANG ; Deyu LI ; Yafeng WANG ; Erwei XIAO ; Chongyang LOU
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery 2018;17(3):237-243
Objective To explore the application value of nano carbon lymph tracing technique in the radical resection of gallbladder cancer.Methods The prospective study was conducted.The clinical data of 120 patients with gallbladder cancer who were admitted to the Henan Provincial People's Hospital between January 2010 and December 2014 were collected.All the patients were allocated into the experimental group and control group by random number table.For the experimental group,a total of 0.1 mL carbon nanoparticles were injected at 4-6 locations subserously around the cancerous site,radical resection of gallbladder cancer were performed at 15 minutes after injection,and intraoperative stained lymph nodes were used as markers to guide lymphadenectomy.Patients in the control group underwent regular radical resection of gallbladder cancer.Observation indicators:(1) intra-and post-operative situations;(2) number of lymph node sorting;(3) follow-up situations.Follow-up using telephone interview was performed to detect survival of patients up to January 2016.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as x-±s and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test.Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M(P25,P75),and comparison between groups was analyzed by the Mann-whitney rank-sum test.Comparisons of count data were analyzed using the chi-square test.Comparison of ordinal data were analyzed by the nonparametric test.The survival curve was drawn by the Kaplan-Meier method.Survival analysis was done using the Log-rank test.Results One hundred and twenty patients were screened for eligibility,and were allocated into the experimental group and control group,60 in each group.(1) Intra-and postoperative situations:operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss and duration of postoperative hospital stay were respectively (164± 51) minutes,(200 ± 98) mL,(13 ± 4) days in the experimental group and (178± 52) minutes,(225±98)mL,(14±5)days in the control group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (t=-l.50,-1.42,-1.03,P>0.05).(2) Comparison of lymph node sorting:overall number of lymph node sorting,overall number of positive lymph node sorting,number of N2 station lymph node sorting and number of positive N2 station lymph node sorting were respectively 13.0 (12.0,15.0),8.0 (5.0,9.0),7.0 (5.0,8.0),3.0 (2.0,4.0) in the experimental group and 10.0 (8.0,12.0),5.0 (4.0,6.0),5.0 (3.0,5.0),1.0 (1.0,2.0) in the control group,with statistically significant differences between groups (Z =-5.51,-4.37,-6.24,-6.18,P<0.05).Number of N1 station lymph node sorting and number of positive N1 station lymph node sorting were respectively 6.0 (5.0,6.0),4.0 (3.0,5.0) in the experimental group and 6.0 (4.0,7.0),4.0 (2,0,5.0) in the control group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (Z =-0.82,-1.34,P>0.05).Overall number of lymph node sorting,overall number of positive lymph node sorting,number of N2 station lymph node sorting and number of positive N2 station lymph node sorting were respectively 5.0 (4.8,6.3),0(0,0.8),2.0 (1.0,3.3),0(0,0.5) in patients with stage Ⅱ of the experimental group and 3.0 (2.0,4.3),0 (0,0),0 (0,1.3),0(0,0) in patients with stage Ⅱ of the control group,with statistically significant differences between groups (Z=-2.96,-2.02,-2.38,-2.01,P<0.05).Number of N 1 station lymph node sorting and number of positive N1 station lymph node sorting were respectively 3.0 (3.0,3.3),0 (0,0.3) in patients with stage [[of the experimental group and 3.0 (2.0,3.0),0 (0,0) in patients with stage Ⅱ of the control group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (Z=-1.18,-1.81,P>0.05).Overall number of lymph node sorting,overall number of positive lymph node sorting,number of N2 station lymph node sorting and number of positive N2 station lymph node sorting were respectively 13.0 (12.0,15.0),7.0 (5.0,8.0),7.0 (5.0,8.0),3.0 (2.0,4.0) in patients with stage Ⅲ of the experimental group and 10.0 (9.0,12.0),5.0 (4.0,6.0),5.0 (4.0,5.0),2.0 (1.0,2.0) in patients with stage Ⅲ of the control group,with statistically significant differences between groups (Z =-4.80,-3.43,-5.25,-4.76,P< 0.05).Number of N1 station lymph node sorting and number of positive N1 station lymph node sorting were respectively 6.0 (6.0,8.0),4.0 (3.0,5.0) in patients with stage Ⅲ of the experimental group and 6.0 (5.0,7.0),4.0 (3.0,4.5) in patients with stage Ⅲ of the control group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (Z=-1.52,-1.16,P>0.05).Overall number of lymph node sorting,overall number of positive lymph node sorting,number of N2 station lymph node sorting and number of positive N2 station lymph node sorting were respectively 14.0 (13.0,15.0),9.0 (8.0,10.0),8.0 (7.5,8.0),4.0 (4.0,5.0) in patients with stage Ⅳa of the experimental group and 11.0 (10.0,13.0),6.0 (4.0,8.0),5.0 (5.0,6.0),2.0 (1.0,2.0) in patients with stage Ⅳ a of the control group,with statistically significant differences between groups (Z =-3.47,-3.25,-4.02,-3.92,P<0.05).Number of N1 station lymph node sorting and number of positive N1 station lymph node sorting were respectively 6.0 (5.5,6.0),5.0 (4.0,5.0) in patients with stage Ⅳa of the experimental group and 6.0 (5.0,7.0),4.0 (3.0,6.0) in patients with stage Ⅳa of the control group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (Z=-0.14,-0.45,P>0.05).(3) Follow-up situations:120 patients were followed up for 12-60 months,with a median time of 28 months.The postoperative overall survival time was (45.7 ± 2.3) months in the experimental group and (36.5 ± 2.4) months in the control group,with a statistically significant difference between groups (x2 =8.32,P< 0.05).The postoperative overall survival time was (54.5±3.0) months in patients with stage Ⅱ of the experimental group and (39.6±0.9)months in patients with stage Ⅱ of the control group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (x2 =3.77,P>0.05).The postoperative overall survival time was (42.2±2.7)months in patients with stage Ⅲ of the experimental group and (35.0±3.0)months in patients with stage]Ⅲ of the control group,with a statistically significant difference between groups (x2=4.12,P<0.05).The postoperative overall survival time was (37.7±2.5)months in patients with stage Ⅳa of the experimental group and (27.0±3.1)months in patients with stage Ⅳa of the control group,with a statistically significant difference between groups (x2 =4.14,P<0.05).Conclusion The nano carbon lymph tracing technique in the radical resection of gallbladder cancer can guide precise operation,increase the numbers of overall and positive lymph nodes sorting,and extend postoperative overall survival time.