No abstract available.
*Cholangiography ; *Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic ; Choledocholithiasis/*surgery ; *Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Female ; Humans ; Male

No abstract available.
Choledocholithiasis/*surgery ; Dilatation/*methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic/*methods

Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in the treatment of common bile duct stones. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted for 158 patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis admitted to the Number One Hospital of Zhangjiakou from January 2015 to December 2019.The patients were assigned into three groups according to the diameters of cystic duct and common bile duct,degrees of abdominal infection and tissue edema,and operation method.Group A(16 cases):laparoscopic cholecystectomy,transcystic choledochoscopic exploration for stone removal;Group B(94 cases):laparoscopic cholecystectomy,common bile duct incision exploration combined with choledochoscopy for stone removal,T tube drainage;Group C(48 cases):laparoscopic cholecystectomy,common bile duct incision exploration combined with choledochoscopy for stone removal,primary closure of the common bile duct.The operation time,residual rate of stones,and complication(bleeding,bile leakage,and wound infection) rate were compared between groups. Results The operation time of groups A,B,and C was(95.1±14.7),(102.2±18.1),(110.1±16.4) minutes,respectively,which showed no statistical difference between each other(F=0.020,P=0.887).One case in group A had residual stones,while no residual stone appeared in groups B and C.The overall stone clearance rate was 99.4% and the overall complication rate was 1.9%.There was no perioperative death. Conclusion It is generally safe and effective to carry out laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration for stone removal in suitable populations.
Choledocholithiasis/surgery* ; Common Bile Duct/surgery* ; Gallstones/surgery* ; Humans ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Retrospective Studies

PURPOSE: Application of a laparoscopic technique to common bile duct explorations has been limited due to technical difficulty. With increased experience and technique, laparoscopic surgery has become a possible option for the treatment of common bile duct stones. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of common bile duct stones. METHODS: Between March 1997 and August 1999, 35 patients with choledocholithiasis were treated with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (4 had a previous biliary operative history). Intraoperative choledochoscopy was used to remove common bile duct stones. The stones were retrieved by using a saline flush, a basket, or a Fogarty catheter. The impacted stones were destroyed using electrohydraulic lithotripsy. RESULTS: Successful laparoscopic stone clearance was achieved in 33 cases (94.3%), and conversion to open surgery occurred in one case (2.9%). The morbidity was 5.7% without mortality. Two cases of retained stone were treated with postoperative choledochoscopic removal via fistula tract and postoperative endoscopic extraction. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is feasible and safe in most patients. With increased of experience, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration could be used widely.
Catheters ; Choledocholithiasis ; Common Bile Duct* ; Conversion to Open Surgery ; Fistula ; Humans ; Laparoscopy* ; Lithotripsy ; Mortality

We report two cases of common bile duct stone formed around a fish bone which migrated from the intestinal tract, along with their characteristic imaging findings. Two patients who had no history of previous operation were admitted because of cholangitis. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) was performed and the cholangiogram showed filling defects with an unusually elongated shape in the common bile duct. After improvement of the cholangitic symptoms, the stones were removed through the PTBD tract under fluoroscopic guidance. A nidus consisting of a 1.5 cm sized fish bone was found in each stone removed.
Aged ; Animals ; Bone and Bones/*radiography/*ultrasonography ; Cholangiography ; Cholangitis/etiology ; Choledocholithiasis/*etiology/surgery ; Female ; Fishes ; Foreign Bodies/*complications/surgery ; Humans ; Male

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effect of anatomic hepatectomy performed under vascular exclusion in management of hepatolithiasis.

METHODSFrom May 2002 to March 2005, fifty-three patients with unilateral hepatolithiasis underwent anatomic hepatectomy with exposure and control of inferior vena cava and main trunk of hepatic veins. The hepatic lobes involved by hepatolithiasis were left lateral lobe (S(2), S(3)) in 12 patients, left lobe (S(2), S(3), S(4)) in 26 patients, right posterior lobe (S(6), S(7)) in 8 patients and right lobe (S(5), S(6), S(7), S(8)) in 7 patients. Atrophy of involved hepatic lobes was found in 38 patients. Fourteen patients had experienced more than one operation on biliary tract. Nine patients showed the symptoms of acute cholangitis preoperatively and 4 patients complicated with liver abscess.

RESULTSVascular exclusion was successfully performed on all patients to control the blood inflow and outflow of liver. The anatomically resected hepatic lobes were left lateral lobe (S(2), S(3)) in 12 patients, left lobe (S(2), S(3), S(4)) in 26 patients, right posterior lobe (S(6), S(7)) in 8 patients and right lobe (S(5), S(6), S(7), S(8)) in 7 patients. Except hepatectomy, the additional procedures performed on the patients were choledocholithotomy in 39 cases, choledocho-jejunostomy in 5 cases. The majority of complications were bile leakage in 3 cases, subphrenic infection in 2 cases, hydrothorax in 5 cases and wound infection in 5 cases.

CONCLUSIONSAnatomic hepatectomy under vascular exclusion is effective treatment to eradicate intrahepatic stone foci in case of unilateral hepatolithiasis, and help to reduce intraoperative blood loss and decrease postoperative complications.

Adult ; Aged ; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic ; surgery ; Choledocholithiasis ; surgery ; Female ; Hepatectomy ; methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The blended current is usually used for endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) to minimize bleeding. The pure cutting current may induce less edema of the ampulla and therefore result in less injury to the pancreas theoretically. The aim of this study was to evaluate effects of electric currents used on the development of serum pancreatic enzyme evaluation, clinical pancreatitis or bleeding after EST. METHODS: One hundred and eighteen consecutive patients who underwent EST with standard papillotome alone for the treatment of choledocholithiasis were reviewed. All EST had been performed by two endoscopists whose experience on EST was similar: one uses 'blended current' (BC group, n=74), while the other uses 'pure cutting current' (PC group, n=44). RESULTS: Baseline clinical, laboratory, and procedural parameters were similar in both groups. The incidences of hyperamylasemia and hyperlipasemia were similar between two groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of clinical pancreatitis between two groups (BC 6.8% vs PC 0.0%, p=0.1557). All episodes of pancreatitis were mild. No episodes of significant bleeding occurred after EST. The incidences of sepsis, cholangitis and perforation were also not different between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Development of complications after standard EST such as hyperamylasemia, clinical pancreatitis, and bleeding may not depend on the electric current used.
Aged ; Choledocholithiasis/surgery ; English Abstract ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreatitis/etiology ; Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic/*adverse effects/methods

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EBD) for choledocholithiasis is known to be comparable to endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) especially in cases of small stones. With larger stones, EBD with conventional balloon, which have a diameter of 6-8 mm, was reported as less effective for extraction of stones. We evaluated the efficacy and complications of EBD with large balloons (10-15 mm) after limited EST for retrieval of choledocholithiasis. From February 2005, we have performed EBD with limited EST for retrieval of common bile duct (CBD) stones. The patients who admitted with hyperamylasemia and gallstone pancreatitis were excluded. In cases without CBD dilation, EPBD with 12 mm for 40 seconds was performed. And in cases with CBD dilation, we dilated the sphincters with 15 mm sized balloon for 40 seconds. Total 22 patients (11 of male) were performed EBD with limited EST for retrieval of CBD stones. The median diameter of the stones was 10 mm (5-25 mm). Ten cases had multiple stones and 6 cases periampullary diverticuli. Successful stone removal in the initial session of ERCP with EBD was accomplished in 16 patients (72.7%). And complete retrieval of bile duct stones was achieved in all patients with repeated ERCP. In the aspect of complications, any episodes of perforation, bleeding was not developed. Only one case of mild grade of post-procedural pancreatitis was noted. However, post-procedural hyperamylasemia was developed in 16 cases (68.2%). EBD with larger balloon seems to be a feasible and safe alternative technique for conventional EST in CBD stone extraction.
Treatment Outcome ; *Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic/adverse effects ; Male ; Humans ; Female ; Choledocholithiasis/surgery/*therapy ; *Balloon Dilatation/adverse effects ; Aged

OBJECTIVETo investigate the rationality and feasibility of primary closure of the common bile duct after choledochotomy for common bile duct calculi.

METHODSFrom January 1990 to June 2001, 386 patients with the evidence of stones in the common bile duct underwent choledochotomy. Among them, 215 received primary closure of the common bile duct (group A) and 171 T-tube drainage (group B). The patients with emergency operations were excluded. Intraoperative choledochoscopy or cholangiography was routinely performed to rule out the possibility of retained stones. The duct was meticulously stitched using 0/3 to 0/5 absorbent sutures for primary closure. A T-tube was placed in the subhepatic space in the patients of both groups.

RESULTSPostoperative bile leakage was seen in 9 patients of group A and in 5 of group B, respectively (P > 0.05), and no reoperations were necessary. After surgery, the average time and volume of transfusion was 4.9 days and 9.1 liters in group A, versus 7.3 days and 12.8 liters in group B (P < 0.01). The patients in group B had a longer postoperative hospital stay than the those in group A (average 17.6:10.0 days, P < 0.01). T-tube removal resulted in bile peritonitis in 5 patients at day 16, 17, 19, 21 and 22 after surgery in group B, and 3 patients required repeated surgery.

CONCLUSIONSPrimary closure of the common bile duct after choledochotomy is safe, effective, and inexpensive in selected patients with common bile duct calculi, and should be regarded as an alternative procedure.

Adult ; Aged ; Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Choledocholithiasis ; surgery ; Common Bile Duct ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is sometimes difficult to incise the distal papillary roof (PR) completely in patients with choledocholiths and choledochoduodenal fistula (CDF). The Iso-Tome(R) (MTW-Endoskopie W. Haag KG), which is helpful in preventing electrical leakage, has good orientation capabilities and can be easily placed at the orifice of the CDF or ampulla of Vater (AV). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) with the Iso-Tome(R) for cutting the distal PR. METHODS: Between May 2003 and July 2012, 35 patients were analyzed retrospectively. The distal PR was cut downward and/or upward using the Iso-tome(R) until the pink intrapapillary mucosa was fully exposed. Downward incisions were performed from the opening of the CDF to the orifice of the AV; upward incisions were performed in reverse. RESULTS: Spontaneous or artificial CDF occurred in four and 31 patients, respectively. The technical and therapeutic success rates were 94.3% (33/35) and 94.3% (33/35), respectively. There was no case of electrical damage to the pink intrapapillary mucosa. Adverse events occurred in 2.9% (1/35; 1, mild bleeding) of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The new technique of ES with the Iso-tome(R) is feasible and useful for effectively incising the distal PR in patients with CDF and choledocholiths.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ampulla of Vater/surgery ; Biliary Fistula/*surgery ; Choledocholithiasis/*surgery ; Common Bile Duct Diseases/*surgery ; Duodenal Diseases/*surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Intestinal Fistula/*surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic/*instrumentation/methods ; Treatment Outcome