BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard treatment for acute cholecystitis. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an alternative treatment to resolve acute inflammation in patients with severe comorbidities. The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy for the patients with acute cholecystitis. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in patients who underwent cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy from January 2010 through November 2014. Seventy-four patients were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups by the operation timing. Group I patients underwent cholecystectomy within 10 days after percutaneous cholecystostomy (n=30) and group II patients underwent cholecystectomy at more than 10 days after percutaneous cholecystostomy (n=44). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between groups in conversion rate to open surgery, operation time, perioperative complications rate, and days of hospital stay after operation. However, complications related to cholecystostomy such as catheter dislodgement occurred significantly more often in group II than group I (group I:group II=0%:18.2%; p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy did not influence postoperative outcomes. However, late surgery caused more complications related to cholecystostomy than early surgery. Therefore, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be considered over late surgery after percutaneous cholecystostomy insertion.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects ; Cholecystitis, Acute/*diagnosis/surgery ; Cholecystostomy ; Female ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies

BACKGROUND: Bile cultures have been used to diagnose and predict the prognosis of acute cholecystitis (AC). As the standard treatment for AC has changed, the appropriate timing and clinical usefulness of bile cultures should be reevaluated. We analyzed the incidence of positive bile cultures in cholecystostomy and cholecystectomy, and attempted to see if a positive bile culture is related to the laboratory and imaging parameters and postoperative infections. METHODS: Included in the study were 86 patients with AC who underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) and then laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). We performed hematologic, biochemical, and radiological analyses at admission and bile cultures with each surgical procedure. The patients were followed for two months for postoperative infections. RESULTS: Bile cultures were positive in 40.7% of the patients at PC, significantly higher than at LC (12.8%). The group with positive cultures showed a higher median age and elevated levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and total bilirubin (TB) than the group with negative cultures. Univariate analysis identified three preoperative factors as predictors of positive bile cultures: age (>55 yr), ALP (>100 IU/L) and TB (>1.2 mg/dL). Infectious complications after LC were mild and the incidence of postoperative infections was not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of bile cultures is low for diagnosing AC, and the adequate timing of bile cultures is at PC, rather than LC. An old age and factors (ALP & TB) manifesting an advanced stage of bile stasis are associated with positive bile cultures. No correlation was found between positive bile cultures and postoperative infections.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bacterial Infections/*diagnosis ; Bile/*microbiology ; *Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods ; Cholecystitis, Acute/complications/*surgery ; *Cholecystostomy/methods ; Culture Techniques ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications/*diagnosis ; Predictive Value of Tests

BACKGROUND: Bile cultures have been used to diagnose and predict the prognosis of acute cholecystitis (AC). As the standard treatment for AC has changed, the appropriate timing and clinical usefulness of bile cultures should be reevaluated. We analyzed the incidence of positive bile cultures in cholecystostomy and cholecystectomy, and attempted to see if a positive bile culture is related to the laboratory and imaging parameters and postoperative infections. METHODS: Included in the study were 86 patients with AC who underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) and then laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). We performed hematologic, biochemical, and radiological analyses at admission and bile cultures with each surgical procedure. The patients were followed for two months for postoperative infections. RESULTS: Bile cultures were positive in 40.7% of the patients at PC, significantly higher than at LC (12.8%). The group with positive cultures showed a higher median age and elevated levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and total bilirubin (TB) than the group with negative cultures. Univariate analysis identified three preoperative factors as predictors of positive bile cultures: age (>55 yr), ALP (>100 IU/L) and TB (>1.2 mg/dL). Infectious complications after LC were mild and the incidence of postoperative infections was not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of bile cultures is low for diagnosing AC, and the adequate timing of bile cultures is at PC, rather than LC. An old age and factors (ALP & TB) manifesting an advanced stage of bile stasis are associated with positive bile cultures. No correlation was found between positive bile cultures and postoperative infections.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bacterial Infections/*diagnosis ; Bile/*microbiology ; *Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods ; Cholecystitis, Acute/complications/*surgery ; *Cholecystostomy/methods ; Culture Techniques ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications/*diagnosis ; Predictive Value of Tests

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Several studies have shown the usefulness of endoscopic nasogallbladder drainage (ENGBD) in patients with acute cholecystitis. However, the procedure is difficult, and factors that affect technical success have not yet been clarified. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the technical feasibility, efficacy, and predictive factors for the technical success of ENGBD in patients with acute cholecystitis. METHODS: All patients with moderate or severe acute cholecystitis who were enrolled underwent ENGBD between April 2009 and April 2011. Patients with surgically altered anatomy or pancreatobiliary malignancies were excluded. The primary outcomes included technical success, clinical success, and complications. Factors that could affect the technical success were also examined. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients who underwent ENGBD during the study period, technical success was achieved in 21 (78%) and clinical improvement was achieved in 20 (95%). Early complications were encountered in four patients (15%). Gallbladder wall thickness (odds ratio [OR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 2.47) and age (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.35) were effective predictors of technical failure. CONCLUSIONS: ENGBD was effective in resolving acute cholecystitis; however, this modality was technically challenging and had a limited success rate. Because of technical difficulties, ENGBD should be reserved for limited indications.
Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cholecystitis, Acute/*surgery ; Drainage/*methods ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/*methods ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Gallbladder/pathology/*surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Odds Ratio ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Prospective Studies ; Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Several studies have shown the usefulness of endoscopic nasogallbladder drainage (ENGBD) in patients with acute cholecystitis. However, the procedure is difficult, and factors that affect technical success have not yet been clarified. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the technical feasibility, efficacy, and predictive factors for the technical success of ENGBD in patients with acute cholecystitis. METHODS: All patients with moderate or severe acute cholecystitis who were enrolled underwent ENGBD between April 2009 and April 2011. Patients with surgically altered anatomy or pancreatobiliary malignancies were excluded. The primary outcomes included technical success, clinical success, and complications. Factors that could affect the technical success were also examined. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients who underwent ENGBD during the study period, technical success was achieved in 21 (78%) and clinical improvement was achieved in 20 (95%). Early complications were encountered in four patients (15%). Gallbladder wall thickness (odds ratio [OR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 2.47) and age (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.35) were effective predictors of technical failure. CONCLUSIONS: ENGBD was effective in resolving acute cholecystitis; however, this modality was technically challenging and had a limited success rate. Because of technical difficulties, ENGBD should be reserved for limited indications.
Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cholecystitis, Acute/*surgery ; Drainage/*methods ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/*methods ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Gallbladder/pathology/*surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Odds Ratio ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Prospective Studies ; Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: Extremely elderly patients who present with complicated gallstone disease are less likely to undergo definitive treatment. The use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in older patients is complicated by comorbid conditions that are concomitant with advanced age and may increase postoperative complications and the frequency of conversion to open surgery. We aimed to evaluate the results of LC in patients (older than 80 years). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 302 patients who underwent LC for acute cholecystitis between January 2011 and December 2013. Total patients were divided into three groups: group 1 patients were younger than 65 years, group 2 patients were between 65 and 79 years, and group 3 patients were older than 80 years. Patient characteristics were compared between the different groups. RESULTS: The conversion rate was significantly higher in group 3 compared to that in the other groups. Hematoma in gallbladder fossa and intraoperative bleeding were higher in group 3, the difference was not significant. Wound infection was not different between the three groups. Operating time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly higher in group 3 compared to those in the other groups. There was no reported bile leakage and operative mortality. Preoperative percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were performed more frequently in group 3 than in the other groups. CONCLUSION: LC is safe and feasible. It should be the gold-standard approach for extremely elderly patients with acute cholecystitis.
Aged* ; Bile ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic* ; Cholecystitis, Acute ; Conversion to Open Surgery ; Drainage ; Gallbladder ; Gallstones ; Hematoma ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Mortality ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Wound Infection