1.Evaluating the effect of local and intraperitoneal bupivacain infiltrations on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy \r\n', u'\r\n', u'
Tu Huu Nguyen ; Thanh Thi Ngan Nguyen
Journal of Medical Research 2007;47(2):100-106
Background: Laparoscopic surgery is as very safe as traditional open surgery. A laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a surgical procedure during which the doctor removes your gallbladde. Objectives: This study was to assess the effect of local and intraperitoneal bupivacain infiltration on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the side effects of this technique. Subjects and method: In study group (n = 37), 25 mg bupivacain 0.25 % and 75 mg were infiltrated at Trocat incisions and at intraperitoneal surgery site, respectively. In placebo group (n = 44): no infiltration was used. VAS was measured controlling patient's pain during at rest, following inspiratory effort and movement; IV perfalgan requirement and the side effects of the technique were observed. Results: VAS at rest, following inspiratory effort and movement as well as perfalgan requirement during postoperative 6 hours were lower in study group (p < 0.05). \r\n", u'A significant decrease of heart rate after 10 - 30 minute of intraperitoneal infiltration of bupivacain was noted. Conclusions: Local and intraperitoneal bupivacain infiltrations had an effectiveness on pain relief during 6 hours after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Moderate bradycardia was a main side effect of this technique. \r\n', u' \r\n', u'
Cholecystectomy/ methods
;
Bupivacaine/ administration &
;
dosage
2.Risk factors for conversion to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Sung Gon KIM ; Ju Ik MOON ; In Seok CHOI ; Sang Eok LEE ; Nak Song SUNG ; Ki Won CHUN ; Hye Yoon LEE ; Dae Sung YOON ; Won Jun CHOI
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2016;90(6):303-308
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors for conversion to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) along with the proposal for procedure selection guidelines in treating patients with benign gallbladder (GB) diseases. METHODS: SILC was performed in 697 cases between April 2010 and July 2014. Seventeen cases (2.4%) underwent conversion to conventional LC. We compared these 2 groups and analyzed the risk factors for conversion to CLC. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologist score > 3, preoperative percutaneous transhepatic GB drainage status and pathology (acute cholecystitis or GB empyema) were significant risk factors for conversion (P = 0.010, P = 0.019 and P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, pathology (acute cholecystitis or GB empyema) was significant risk factors for conversion to CLC in SILC (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although SILC is a feasible method for most patients with benign GB disease, CLC has to be considered in patients with acute cholecystitis or GB empyema because it is likely to result in inadequate visualization of the Calot's triangle and greater bleeding risk.
Cholecystectomy
;
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic*
;
Cholecystitis
;
Cholecystitis, Acute
;
Drainage
;
Empyema
;
Gallbladder
;
Hemorrhage
;
Humans
;
Methods
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Pathology
;
Risk Factors*
3.Minimally Invasive Single-Site Cholecystectomy in Obese Patients: Laparoscopic vs. Robotic
Kyu Min LEE ; Dae Hun HAN ; Seoung Yoon ROH ; Ho Kyoung HWANG ; Woo Jung LEE ; Chang Moo KANG
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2019;22(3):101-105
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is treatment method for management of benign gallbladder diseases. Further attempts are made to operate single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the procedure remains technically difficult, especially in obese patient. Recently, a robotic surgical system for minimal invasive surgery was introduced to overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: From April 2009 to August 2017, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with single-site, minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) cholecystectomy with high BMI (>25 kg/m2). We analyzed general characteristics and perioperative outcomes between the single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy group and the robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC) group. RESULTS: Operation time (57.56±11.10 vs 98.5±12.28 p<0.001) was significantly longer and postoperative pain score (3.61 vs 5.15 p=0.000) was significantly higher in the robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC) group, but the actual dissection time (25.85±11.09 vs 25.79±13.35 p=0.978) was not significantly different between the two approaches. Iatrogenic gallbladder perforation, (13 vs 6 p=0.005), patients undergoing RSSC showed a significantly smaller amount than did those undergoing single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SFLC). CONCLUSION: It is difficult to say for certain that RSSC is clearly better than SFLC in obese patients. However, because of the technical convenience and efficiency of surgery with RSSC, RSSC can be practically worthwhile. Further study is mandatory.
Cholecystectomy
;
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
;
Gallbladder
;
Gallbladder Diseases
;
Humans
;
Laparoscopy
;
Medical Records
;
Methods
;
Obesity
;
Pain, Postoperative
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Robotic Surgical Procedures
4.A Comparative Study of Needlescopic Grasper Assisted Single Incision versus Three-Port versus Pure Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Chai Won KIM ; Soo Ho LEE ; Kee Hwan KIM
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2019;22(4):171-176
PURPOSE: Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is a surgical method to treat gallbladder disease designed to reduce postoperative pain and improve cosmetic results. However, pure SILC (pSILC) has several inherent limitations. In this study, we report the surgical outcomes of SILC with needlescopic grasper (nSILC) compared with those of pSILC and conventional three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TPLC).METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 103 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease in our hospital between January 2013 and January 2015. Among them, 33 patients underwent pSILC, 35 underwent nSILC, and 35 underwent TPLC. We collected demographic characteristics and operative data to analyze outcomes between groups.RESULTS: All procedures were done by laparoscopy and the gallbladder of each patient was completely removed. Women and younger patients were more to undergo SILC than TPLC. Analysis showed that the operation time of the nSILC group was longer than that of the TPLC group, but shorter than that of the pSILC group (skin to skin operation time [pSILC: 65.2±19.1 min, nSILC: 49.7±12.9 min, and TPLC: 43.4±14.7 min, p<0.001], and major procedure time [pSILC: 42.2±18.7 min, nSILC: 25.9±8.9 min, and TPLC: 23.4±12.7 min, p<0.001]). There were no significant differences between the groups for patient visual analogue scale score, length of hospital stay, or intraoperative blood loss.CONCLUSION: nSILC is feasible surgical method in patients with benign gallbladder disease compared to TPLC, and that is an effective procedure to overcome the disadvantage of pSILC.
Cholecystectomy
;
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
;
Female
;
Gallbladder
;
Gallbladder Diseases
;
Humans
;
Laparoscopy
;
Length of Stay
;
Methods
;
Pain, Postoperative
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Skin
6.Combined needlescopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic splenectomy for the treatment of thalassaemic splenomegaly and cholelithiasis.
Jasmi AY ; Thambidorai CR ; Khairussalleh J
The Medical Journal of Malaysia 2003;58(3):443-445
Gallstone disease is a common association in patients with haematological splenomegaly. When indicated, simultaneous splenectomy and cholecystectomy should be performed and traditionally this is accomplished by open surgery. We report a 17 year old thalassaemic girl with splenomegaly complicated by gallstone pancreatitis. We treated her with a combination of needlescopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic splenectomy as well as delivering the huge spleen via a pfannenstiel incision to hide the scar. We believe this technique is an acceptable alternative mainly for rapid delivery of the spleen and to minimize visible scars hence improving cosmesis.
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/*methods
;
Cholelithiasis/etiology
;
Cholelithiasis/*surgery
;
Splenectomy/*methods
;
Splenomegaly/etiology
;
Splenomegaly/*surgery
;
beta-Thalassemia/*complications
7.Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an adult patient with congenital pulmonary hypoplasia: a case report.
Jia-sheng QIN ; Yi GAO ; Ming-xin PAN
Journal of Southern Medical University 2011;31(8):1334-1335
Congenital pulmonary hypoplasia is a rare developmental abnormality of the lung with an incidence rate of around 1/5000 000. As a fatal condition associated with respiratory insufficiency after birth, this disease is rare in adults. We treated a 29-year-old female patient with congenital pulmonary hypoplasia and concurrent of cystic duct calculus in May, 2011 using single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which resulted in a good therapeutic effect comparable to that by routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Abnormalities, Multiple
;
Adult
;
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
;
methods
;
Female
;
Gallstones
;
complications
;
surgery
;
Humans
;
Lung
;
abnormalities
;
Lung Diseases
;
complications
8.Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case report.
Wei GUO ; Zhong-tao ZHANG ; Wei HAN ; Jian-she LI ; Lan JIN ; Jun LIU ; Xiao-mu ZHAO ; Yu WANG
Chinese Medical Journal 2008;121(23):2463-2464
9.Application of three-dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for complicated gallstone disease.
Ning ZENG ; Chihua FANG ; Jian YANG ; Nan XIANG ; Wen ZHU ; Jun LIU ; Qingshan CHEN ; Hongbo LIANG ; Wenjie HUANG
Journal of Southern Medical University 2016;36(1):145-147
OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical value of three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of complicated gallstone disease.
METHODSFrom March 2014 to March 2015, 46 patients underwent cholecystectomy for complicated gallstone disease under 3D laparoscopy (3D group) and 43 received 2D laparoscopic cholecystectomy (2D group). The surgical data including the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, the rate of conversion to open laparotomy, recovery time of postoperative bowel motion and hospital stay were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTSLaparoscopic cholecystectomy was successfully completed in 43 patients in 3D group and in 39 patients in 2D group, and the rates of conversion to open laparotomy were similar between the two groups (P>0.05). The median operation time was significantly shorter in 3D group than in 2D group (50.5∓15.2 vs 65.4∓18.1 min, P<0.05), and the median volume of intraoperative blood loss was significantly smaller in 3D group (34.1∓13.6 vs 44.5∓22.3 mL, P>0.05). No significant differences were found in the recovery time of postoperative bowel motion and postoperative hospital stays between the two groups (P>0.05).
CONCLUSION3D laparoscopy, which provides three-dimensional vision with a good sense of depth to allow precise surgical manipulation, can shorten the operation time and reduce the rate of conversion to open laparotomy for patients undergoing 3D laparoscopic cholecystectomy for complicated gallstone disease.
Blood Loss, Surgical ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic ; methods ; Gallstones ; surgery ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Length of Stay ; Operative Time