The in vivo photosensitizing efficacy of chlorophyll derivatives(CpD), which had been developed as a new photosensitizer, was compared with that of hematoporphyrin derivatives (HpD). A murine tumor model implanted subcutaneously with S-180 cells on the abdomen was used. The CpD or HpD was administered by intratumoral injection, and light of appropriate wavelength was irradiated on the tumor areas for 10 minutes at 1h and 24h or 24h and 48h after the injection of photosensitizer. When CpD was injected, the early irradiation group (1h and 24h) showed a 100% tumor cure rate; however, the late irradiation group (24h and 48h) showed a 60% tumor cure rate (p less than 0.01). This showed that the early irradiation with light after injection of CpD was an important factor for obtaining better results. With HpD, there was no difference in tumor cure rate between early (1h and 24h, 80%) and late irradiation (24h and 48h, 80%) groups. Thus, in early irradiation groups, the tumor cure rate using CpD (100%) was superior to that of HpD (80%) (p less than 0.05). However, in late irradiation groups, the tumor cure rate using CpD (60%) was inferior to that of HpD (80%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p greater than 0.1). Pathologic sections of these tumors were made before treatment and 48h and 3 weeks after treatment. These showed geographic necrosis at 48h after treatment and no viable tumor tissue at 3 weeks after treatment. Our results showed that CpD was as effective as HpD as a photosensitizer for in vivo photodynamic therapy.
Abdomen ; Animal ; Chlorophyll/*analogs and derivatives ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred ICR ; Photochemotherapy/*methods ; Sarcoma, Experimental/*drug therapy ; Skin Neoplasms/*drug therapy

The in vivo photosensitizing efficacy of chlorophyll derivatives(CpD), which had been developed as a new photosensitizer, was compared with that of hematoporphyrin derivatives (HpD). A murine tumor model implanted subcutaneously with S-180 cells on the abdomen was used. The CpD or HpD was administered by intratumoral injection, and light of appropriate wavelength was irradiated on the tumor areas for 10 minutes at 1h and 24h or 24h and 48h after the injection of photosensitizer. When CpD was injected, the early irradiation group (1h and 24h) showed a 100% tumor cure rate; however, the late irradiation group (24h and 48h) showed a 60% tumor cure rate (p less than 0.01). This showed that the early irradiation with light after injection of CpD was an important factor for obtaining better results. With HpD, there was no difference in tumor cure rate between early (1h and 24h, 80%) and late irradiation (24h and 48h, 80%) groups. Thus, in early irradiation groups, the tumor cure rate using CpD (100%) was superior to that of HpD (80%) (p less than 0.05). However, in late irradiation groups, the tumor cure rate using CpD (60%) was inferior to that of HpD (80%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p greater than 0.1). Pathologic sections of these tumors were made before treatment and 48h and 3 weeks after treatment. These showed geographic necrosis at 48h after treatment and no viable tumor tissue at 3 weeks after treatment. Our results showed that CpD was as effective as HpD as a photosensitizer for in vivo photodynamic therapy.
Abdomen ; Animal ; Chlorophyll/*analogs and derivatives ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred ICR ; Photochemotherapy/*methods ; Sarcoma, Experimental/*drug therapy ; Skin Neoplasms/*drug therapy

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect and potential mechanisms about apoptosis induction and migration suppression of photodynamic therapy with a new photosensitizer, 9-hydroxypheophorbide-α (9-HPbD), and diode laser on HN-3 human laryngeal squamous cancer cells. METHOD: The attached HN-3 cancer cells were photosesitized with 0.29 μg/ml and 0.59 μg/ml 9-HPbD for 6 h and irradiated by 664 nm diode laser for 15 min at an energy density of 2.0 J/cm for activating 9-HPbD. Wound healing assay and photographing was respectively performed immediately after laser irradiation. Photographing focusing on the same location was repeated 12 h, 24 h and 36 h after PDT and cells migration distance counted respectively. H2DCFDA staining was used to assess accumulation of reactive oxygen series (ROS) 1 h after PDT. MTT assay, Hoechst33342/PI double staining, western blotting were respectively performed to assess cellular viability, apoptosis and the expression of Enos, p-c-Jun, EGFR. RESULT: Phototoxicity and apoptosis on HN-3 cells induced by 9-HPbD-PDT was exhibited in a dose-related manner. Neither 9-HPbD alone nor laser alone was cytotoxic to HN-3 cells. Generation of ROS was initiated immediately after PDT. The apoptotic cells, marked with condensed/fragmented blue or pink nuclei, and up-regulated expression of eNOS, p-c-Jun were subsequently induced 24 h after PDT. Coupled with a down-regulated expression of EGFR, a photosensitizer dose-ralated cell migration suppression was initiated by PDT. After pretreatment of GSH or ascorbic acid, a kind of antioxidant, the efficacy of PDT-induced apoptosis and migration suppression was partially inhibited. CONCLUSION Activation of p-c-Jun, eNOS and down-regulated expression of EGFR may respectively involve in the apoptosis induction and cell migration suppression after 9-HPbD-PDT. Generation of ROS may play an important role in the course of apoptosis induction and migration suppression of HN-3 cells initiated by 9-HPbD-PDT.
Apoptosis ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; pathology ; Cell Line, Tumor ; drug effects ; Cell Movement ; Cell Survival ; Chlorophyll ; analogs & derivatives ; pharmacology ; Head and Neck Neoplasms ; pathology ; Humans ; Laryngeal Neoplasms ; pathology ; Lasers ; Photochemotherapy ; Photosensitizing Agents ; pharmacology ; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck

Animal ; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/isolation & purification/*pharmacology ; Chlorophyll/*analogs & derivatives/isolation & purification/pharmacology/radiation effects ; Comparative Study ; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor ; Feces/*chemistry ; Hematoporphyrin Derivative ; Hematoporphyrins/pharmacology ; Human ; Leukocytes, Mononuclear/drug effects ; Mice ; Oxygen/metabolism ; Photochemistry ; Photochemotherapy ; Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/isolation & purification/*pharmacology ; Silkworms/*metabolism ; Singlet Oxygen ; Spectrophotometry ; Structure-Activity Relationship ; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Tumor Cells, Cultured/*drug effects/radiation effects