Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in pregnant women is a rare but potentially lethal occurrence that should be carefully managed, especially in consideration of cardiac conditions being a rising cause of maternal deaths. Risk factors for AMI occurrence, in addition to typical cardiac-related risk factors, include medical conditions such as (pre) eclampsia, blood transfusions, thrombophilia and postpartum infections. Being older, multigravida or in the third trimester of pregnancy is also associated with an increased risk. The pathophysiological causes underlying AMI in pregnancy are diverse but generally associated with the coagulative and physiological changes related to the pregnancy. The selection of diagnostic modality and treatment options require careful consideration for pregnancy-related changes as well as risk of harm to the patient and fetus. This paper serves to review available literature regarding an extensive range of management issues that directly impact on maternal and fetal outcomes.
Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Myocardial Infarction ; complications ; physiopathology ; therapy ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular ; physiopathology ; therapy ; Young Adult

INTRODUCTION: Dyslipidaemia is a major risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). There is a lack of data on the extent of lipid abnormalities and lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in Singapore. METHODS: The Dyslipidemia International Study (DYSIS) II was a multinational observational study of patients with stable CHD and hospitalised patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A full lipid profile and use of LLT were documented at baseline, and for the ACS cohort, at four months post-hospitalisation. RESULTS: 325 patients were recruited from four sites in Singapore; 199 had stable CHD and 126 were hospitalised with an ACS. At baseline, 96.5% of the CHD cohort and 66.4% of the ACS cohort were being treated with LLT. In both cohorts, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were lower for the treated than the non-treated patients; accordingly, a higher proportion of patients met the LDL-C goal of < 70 mg/dL (CHD: 28.1% vs. 0%, p = 0.10; ACS: 20.2% vs. 0%, p < 0.01). By the four-month follow-up, a higher proportion of the ACS patients that were originally not treated with LLT had met the LDL-C goal (from 0% to 54.5%), correlating with the increased use of medication. However, there was negligible improvement in the patients who were treated prior to the ACS. CONCLUSION Dyslipidaemia is a significant concern in Singapore, with few patients with stable or acute CHD meeting the recommended European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society goal. LLT was widely used but not optimised, indicating considerable scope for improved management of these very-high-risk patients.