The patient is a women in her 60s. After medical examinations, she was told that the result of fecal occult blood reaction testing was positive. Moreover, colonoscopy found type 2 cancer in her sigmoid colon. The patient underwent sigmoidectomy. The 3D dissection of lymph node and colorectal side-to-end anastomosis were performed. Pathologically, the case was diagnosed as moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (stage II). Adjuvant chemotherapy was not given. During follow-up observation, the tumor marker levels were elevated above normal. A work-up revealed a recurrence of the cancer on the abdominal wall. The lesion was surgically removed with a margin of about 2 cm from the tumor secured. Pathological diagnosis of this recurrent case was not inconsistent with the previous diagnosis of sigmoid colon cancer. As the relapse was thought to be due to the implantation of cancer cells in the abdominal wall, we need to follow the surgical procedure with scrupulous care and exercise the utmost precaution to protect incision wound on the abdominal wall.

Background: There has been debate over the indications for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in recent years in Japan. In addition, the level of satisfaction of patients and patient’s family after PEG remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the current status of PEG and the level of satisfaction of patients and patients’ families after PEG in Japan.
Methods: We reviewed the existing data of all patients who underwent PEG tube insertion at Yuri Kumiai General Hospital (Akita, Japan) between February 2000 and December 2010. We examined the following points: underlying diseases requiring PEG, levels of consciousness, and performance status. We also sent a questionnaire to the patients and patient’s families to ask about their satisfaction with and thoughts about PEG.
Results: The data of 545 patients who underwent PEG were reviewed. There were 295 men and 250 women, with a mean age of 77.2 ± 11.4 years. PEG was indicated most frequently for cerebrovascular disorders (48.2%, 239/545). There were 515 (94.4%, 515/545) patients showing consciousness disturbance and 444 (81.5%, 444/545) bedridden patients. The questionnaire was answered by one patient himself and 316 patients’ families. When asked, “Was performing PEG a good decision?”, 57.5% (182/316) of the patients’ families answered yes. Meanwhile, when patients’ family members were asked if they would wish to undergo PEG if they were in the same condition as the patient, 28.4% (90/316) answered yes, whereas 55.3% (175/316) answered no.
Conclusions: Few patients were able to make their own decision about PEG tube placement because of consciousness disturbance. As a result, many family members of the patients did not want to experience PEG for themselves. Future studies should be performed to clarify the quality of life and ethical aspects associated with PEG.

The present study aimed to examine the effects of community-based intervention on cognitive function and hand finger dexterity in older adults at different levels of time to go out. Forty men and women (age, 73 ± 1 years) participated in supervised group activity and seated exercise for 60 min per session, once each week during an 8-week intervention. The participants wore an activity monitor for 1 week to determine baseline values and for the 8 weeks of intervention. Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and pegboard test, which is related to cognitive function, were assessed before and after the intervention. Based on the total time to go out at baseline, the participants were assigned to Control group (> 60 min/day, n = 18) or Short group (≦ 60 min /day, n = 22), and then analyzed. After the 8 weeks of intervention, the Control and Short groups improved physical fitness parameters such as handgrip strength. Although MMSE in the both groups did not reach statistically significant level, these values tended to increase slightly from the baseline. Interestingly, two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated significant interaction of pegboard test, and the score significantly increased only in the Short group. Total physical activity and moderate-vigorous physical activity in the both groups did not change significantly between the baseline and intervention periods. Therefore, these results suggest that the trainability of pegboard test, which is an index of hand finger dexterity and is related to cognitive function, would differ depending on the time to go out at baseline in older adults.

The primary aims of this study were; 1) to investigate the appropriateness of the analgesic therapy in hospitalized cancer patients, and 2) to explore the effects of the screening system by a pharmacist-palliative care physician screening team on analgesic regimens.
The pharmacist-palliative care physician screeningteam screened consecutive cancer patients about the adequacy of analgesic treatments and provided written recommendations to primary physicians. Inclusion criteria were cancer patients admitted to oncology wards, not having been consulted to palliative care team, and receiving opioid or chemotherapy. Of 62 patients screened, analgesia was inadequate in 44%, and preemptive pharmacological treatments for opioid-induced nausea and constipation was lacking in 42% of 43 patients who had received opioids. The team provided a total of 80 recommendations for 52 patients, and primary physicians followed 94% of the recommendations within one week. The pharmacist-palliative care physician screening team may contribute to better analgesia in patients not having been consulted to the specialized palliative care service.

Introduction: We investigated a protocol to support the treatment of constipation that was developed in collaboration with physicians and the effectiveness of Protocol Based Pharmacotherapy Management (PBPM) performed by pharmacists in improving constipation.Methiod: Patients with constipation who underwent PBPM between August 2020 and May 2021 were included in this study. The results of the Constipation Scoring System (CSS) and the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) assessments by pharmacists on the first day of intervention and at discharge were collected retrospectively to evaluate the efficacy of PBPM. Wilcoxon's signed rank test was used for statistical analysis, and the threshold value for rejecting the null hypothesis was p < 0.05.Results: Of the 23 eligible patients, three were excluded according to the criteria, and 20 patients were included. Median CSS improved significantly from 11.5 points [8.25-16.75] at the first intervention to 5.5 points [2.75-10.25] at discharge. The median BSFS improved significantly from Type 2 [2-3] to Type 3.5 [3-4]. Conclusion: PBPM by pharmacists to support the treatment of constipation resulted in improvement of constipation.