Anal incontinence following pelvic trauma, surgery or neurologic disorder has significant medical and social implications. When no known functioning sphincter muscles are present, surgical correction of this distressing condition other than by stomal fecal diversion is aimed at recreating a sphincter mechanism under voluntary control. The use of the gluteus maximus encircling the neorectum with a contractile muscualr ring provides an active control of continence and reserves the anorectal angulation. The sacrifice of the entire gluteus maximum muscle in an ambulatory patient will cause difficulty in climbing stairs; however, the use of the anatomically dissected lower half will preserve its function. With careful dissection, the lower half of the g1uteus maximus muscle together with its neurovascular supply can be developed for anal sphincter reconstruction. Three Patient, (two men and one woman) underwent g1uteus maximus transposition for complete anal incontinence. The indication for operation were sphincter destruction secondary to extensive soft tissue necrosis on perianal, perineal and buttock area due to necrotizing fascitis(n=2), and soft tissue defect on perianal, buttock area due to trauma(n=1). The procedure is performed with the use of a diverting colostomy. The inferior portion of the origin of each gluteus maximus is detached from the sacrum and coccyx, bifurcated,and tunneled subcutaneously to encircle the anus. The ends were sutured together to form two opposing slings of voluntary muscles. Postoperatively two patient regained continence to solid stool, one to liquid stool as well. The technique of constructing sphincter is simple and utilizes principles of muscle tendon transfer without jeopardizing function of gait. Furthermore the gluteus maximus muscle, being an accessory muscle of anal continence, is an ideal structure for this reconstruction.
Anal Canal ; Buttocks ; Coccyx ; Colostomy ; Fecal Incontinence ; Gait ; Humans ; Male ; Muscle, Skeletal ; Muscles ; Necrosis ; Nervous System Diseases ; Sacrum ; Tendon Transfer

PURPOSE: Accuracy of image matching between resting and smiling facial models is affected by the stability of the reference surfaces. This study aimed to investigate the morphometric variations in subdivided facial units during resting, posed and spontaneous smiling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The posed and spontaneous smiling faces of 33 adults were digitized and registered to the resting faces. The morphological changes of subdivided facial units at the forehead (upper and lower central, upper and lower lateral, and temple), nasal (dorsum, tip, lateral wall, and alar lobules), and chin (central and lateral) regions were assessed by measuring the 3D mesh deviations between the smiling and resting facial models. The one-way analysis of variance, Duncan post hoc tests, and Student’s t-test were used to determine the differences among the groups (α = .05). RESULTS: The smallest morphometric changes were observed at the upper and central forehead and nasal dorsum; meanwhile, the largest deviation was found at the nasal alar lobules in both the posed and spontaneous smiles (P < .001). The spontaneous smile generally resulted in larger facial unit changes than the posed smile, and significant difference was observed at the alar lobules, central chin, and lateral chin units (P < .001). CONCLUSION The upper and central forehead and nasal dorsum are reliable areas for image matching between resting and smiling 3D facial images. The central chin area can be considered an additional reference area for posed smiles; however, special cautions should be taken when selecting this area as references for spontaneous smiles.