No abstract available.
Colon* ; Colonic Neoplasms*

No abstract available.
Adenoma* ; Colorectal Neoplasms*

The ancillary practice for the management of upper ureteral stones is to push the stone up the renal pelvis before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL). We evaluated 103 patients with mid and upper ureteral stones for identifying the significant factors of success in push up procedure. The clinical factors of success of push up procedure may be regarded to location (upper, mid), size( 12mm>=,12mm<), duration of impaction( 1Mo>=, 1Mo<), duration of symptoms (1Mo>=, 1Mo<), smoothness of the surface of the stone (Smooth, Rough), degree of obstruction (partial, complete), pyuria or not (WBC> 5, WBC<=5 in microscopic urinalysis) Our results showed that the success rate of push up were 92.7%, 96.3%, 92.9%, 93.3%, 96.6 %, 94.4%, and 93.5% in the case of upper ureter stone, less than 12mm in diameter in stone size, less than 1 month in duration of initial symptoms and impaction, smooth stone surface, partial obstruction, presence of pyuria, respectively compared to 28.6%, 60.7%, 68.4%, 53.3%, 77.8 %, 75%. and 84.2% in the case of mid ureter stone. more than 12mm in diameter, more than 1 month in duration of initial symptoms and impaction, rough stone surface, complete obstruction, absence of pyuria respectively. These are clinically significant factors of affecting success in push up procedure (P<0.05 ) except appearance of pyuria or not (P>0.05). Complications of push up were infrequent, with hematuria (30.7%), flank pain (29.7% ), and ureteral perforation (2.2% ), all of which were managed conservatively. From these data we conclude that upper ureter stones with successful clinical factors should be tried push-up into the renal pelvis before ESWL to improve the therapeutic results.
Flank Pain ; Hematuria ; Humans ; Kidney Pelvis ; Pyuria ; Shock ; Ureter*

The serum PSA concentration is directly correlated with patient age and prostatic volume. Thus, rather than rely on a single reference range for men of all age group, it is more appropriate to have age-specific reference ranges. We define the cancer-free population as men with a PSA less than or equal to 4.0ng/ml and nonsuspicious digital rectal examination, and those with an abnormality in either parameter with a nonmalignant prostate biopsy. A total of 905 men was recruited for a prostate cancer detection study using serum PSA and digital rectal examination, of whom 869 fulfilled our criteria of cancer-free. The upper limits for PSA(mean +2 standard deviations) by age were 2.89ng/ml in the 40 to 49-year group, 4. 67ng/ml in the 50 to 59-year group, 5.49ng/ml in the 60 to 69-year group and 6.48ng/ml in the 70 to 79-year group. It is the purpose of our study to know that how accurate our definition of normal as evidenced by a lack of cancer in men with a normal digital rectal examination and PSA between 4.0 and the derived upper limit of normal is. The apparent accuracy of these new limits is strong in the 50 to 69-year group but it declines in the next decade. The data support further attempts at using PSA, age and digital rectal examination to establish selection criteria for prostate biopsy with adequate specificity.
Biopsy ; Digital Rectal Examination ; Humans ; Male ; Patient Selection ; Prostate ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; Reference Values* ; Sensitivity and Specificity

No abstract available.

No abstract available.
Brain* ; Neoplasm Metastasis*

No abstract available.
Female ; Lactation*

No abstract available.
Adenocarcinoma* ; Estrogens*

The rectal prolapse syndome is a disease entity includes rectocele and rectal prolapse, presenting prolapse(procidentia) of rectum. In rectocele, rectum is prolapsed anteriorly into the vagina, whereas in procidentia, inferiorly out of the anus. This study was aimed at analyzing pathogenesis and adequacy of surgical treatment in rectocele and rectal prolapse. Twenty-one patients with rectocele and 18 patients with rectal prolapse were assessed pre- and post-operatively in respect to symptoms and signs, pathogenesis, defecography, and manometry. In analysis of symptoms and sings, constipation was the commonest in both diseases(86% of rectocele and 67% of rectal prolapse) and incontinence was not infrequently found in both diseases as well(14% of rectocele and 33% of rectal prolapse). In analysis of the underlying causes, two patients with rectal prolapse had prolapse from childhood. Defecography showed anorectal angle of rectal prolapse in rest and push period. They were significantly wider than those of rectocele(p<0.05). The perineal descent of rectal prolapse was longer than that of rectocele. In analysis of the associated factors, average number of delivery was more than three times in both diseases(3.5 of rectocele and 5.1 of rectal prolapse). We could easily find previous operation history in both diseases. Among them, hysterectomy was the most frequent, especially in patients with rectocele. The hemorrhoids was associated more common in rectocele than in rectal prolapse(p<0.05). Preoperative maximal resting pressure of rectal prolapse was more significantly decreased than that of rectocele(p<0.05). The sensation of fullness was significantly decreased in patients with rectal prolapse postoperatively(p<0.05). Patients with rectocele underwent levator plication by transrectal or vaginal approach. Patients with rectal prolapse underwent posterior rectopexy in 11 patients, resection and rectopexy in 3 patients, Delorme's operation and Thiersch operation in 2 patients each. Constipation was significantly improved in patients with rectocele postoperatively(p<0.05). Incontinence was markedly improved in patients with rectal prolapse postoperatively(p<0.05). At the interview about subjective improvement of symptom, 95% of patients with rectocele and 89% of patients with rectal prolapse were satisfied with surgery. In conclusion, rectocele and rectal prolapse can be categorized as rectal prolapse syndrome because both diseases have anatomical derangements caused by similar pathogenesis such as altered bowel habits, anatomical factor, delivery, past history of hysterectomy, and hemorrhoids. Levator plication and posterior rectopexy seem to be useful surgical methods of anatomical repair for the respective disease.
Anal Canal ; Constipation ; Defecography ; Hemorrhoids ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Manometry ; Prolapse ; Rectal Prolapse* ; Rectocele ; Rectum ; Sensation ; Vagina

No abstract available.
Carcinoma, Small Cell* ; Female ; Ovary*