Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop a non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) prevention program for adolescents and confirm its effectiveness in primary prevention by applying dialectical behavior therapy skills training (DBT-ST). Methods: From September to December 2021, 217 first-year students in three middle schools in the Chungcheong Province were tested for changes from before and after the program using the Responses to Depressed Mood Questionnaire and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-16 using paired t-tests. McNemar’s test was conducted to confirm the changes in the perception and attitude scale of NSSI for each question. Results: A comparison of the changes from before and after the program revealed that the response to depressed mood (t=7.93, p<0.001), ruminant response (t=5.18, p<0.001), and distractive response (t=6.07, p<0.001) which are subfactors of the response to depressive moods, were significantly affected. There was a significant decrease in the difficulty in performing goaloriented behavior (t=3.34, p=0.01) and lack of emotional clarity (t=2.52, p=0.012), which are subfactors of emotional regulation difficulties. Also, in the comparison of the perception and attitude towards NSSI, statistically significant changes were confirmed in 7 out of a total of 9 questions (p<0.001). Conclusion It was confirmed that this program developed by applying DBT-ST was effective in the primary prevention of NSSI for adolescents.

objectives: ：This study aims to compare the mental health of adolescents living in child care institutions (orphanages) and youth shelters, to provide basic data for appropriate psychiatric interventions for each facilities. Methods: ：The sample consisted of 157 adolescents in child care institutions and 31 adolescents in Youth Shelters who completed the Korean version of the Youth Self Report (K-YSR). We compared the K-YSR scores between the two groups and also examined factors related to suicidality. Results: ：Adolescents in youth shelters were older and had higher rates of drinking (p<0.001), smoking (p<0.001), and “abnormal sleep” (p=0.007) than adolescents in child care institutions. They also showed higher ‘suicidality’ (p=0.004) and K-YSR scores. On the other hand, adolescents in child care institutions have lower ‘suicidality’, but they have higher ‘suicidality’ when they have ‘abnormal sleep’ (OR 4.194; p=0.006),abnormal diet’ (OR 2.503; p=0.010), and ‘concerns about weight gain’ (OR 2.503; p=0.010). Additionally, 17.6% of participants in the study showed ‘suicidality’. The ‘suicidality’ group had a higher overall K-YSR score than the non-suicidal group, and had higher ‘abnormal sleep’ (OR 3.766; p=0.014) and ‘concern about weight gain’ (OR 2.864; p=0.032). Conclusions ：Adolescents in youth shelters appear to have more serious clinical difficulties than adolescents in child care institutions, so prompt psychiatric intervention is needed. Additionally, it is necessary to consider mental health assessments including suicidality when adolescents in child care institutions complain of sleep, eating, or weight gain problems.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the demographic characteristics, responses to negative emotions, and difficulties in emotion regulation between self-harming adolescents and control individuals aged 12–14 years from the community. Methods: Data were collected from adolescents in Chungcheong Province, South Korea, between September 2021 and November 2022.Demographic characteristics and responses to the Depressed Mood Questionnaire and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-16 (DERS-16) were compared between the self-harm and control groups. Results: The self-harm group exhibited a higher prevalence of child abuse (odds ratio [OR]=4.787, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.591– 14.409, p=0.005) and school bullying victimization (OR=4.495, 95% CI=2.353–8.588, p<0.001) than those in the control group. The selfharm group displayed higher levels of rumination (t=7.88, p<0.001) and reduced distraction responses (reverse score t=2.25, p=0.025) than those of the control group. Additionally, the self-harm group scored higher on all subscales and the total DERS-16 score (t=7.61, p<0.001). Conclusion Interventions for self-harming adolescents should address child abuse and bullying victimization. Prevention programs for self-harming adolescents should focus on reducing rumination responses, increasing distractive responses, and addressing difficulties in emotion regulation using dialectical behavior therapy-skill training.