1.Short-term efficacy and influencing factor analysis of modified transanal Soave surgery on hirschsprung′s disease infants in initial radial resection
Chengpeng ZHAO ; Yongfu DUAN ; Xiaobo ZHOU ; Xiaochen MEI
The Journal of Practical Medicine 2015;(12):1999-2001
Objective To observe the short-term clinical efficacy of modified transanal Soave surgery on infants with hirschsprung′s disease (HD) in initial radial resection, and to analyze the influencing factors. Methods 132 HD infants were selected. After initial radial resection with modified transanal , Soave surgery was conducted under general or sacral anesthesia. Postoperative antibiotics were routinely given. Results 19-56 cm intestinal canal samples were excised, with average length of (35.07 ± 3.15) cm. The average surgical duration and intra-operative hemorrhagic volume were (120.48 ± 18.34) min and verage was (45.74 ± 8.14) mL. All infants′ gastrointestinal function was recovered in 24 h postoperatively. The total excellent and effective rate of anal function in 6 months was 90.90% postoperatively. Cox modal multivariate analysis suggested that anastomotic orifice stenosis and enteritis were the two factors that greatly influenced the excellent and effective rate of anal function 6 months after the surgery (P < 0.05). Conclusion The modified transanal Soave surgery has small trauma and low complication rate on HD infants in initial radial resection , and the postoperative enteritis and anastomotic orifice stenosis are independent influencing factors for the short-term efficacy.
2.A study of capsule endoscopy and clinical scoring system for risk stratification of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Liang WANG ; Li HE ; Chengpeng ZHAO ; Shiyi SHEN
Chongqing Medicine 2015;(8):1077-1079
Objective To evaluate the guidance value of capsule endoscopy and clinical scoring system in risk stratification for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) .Methods 24 patients presenting to the emergency room with AUGIB ,were randomly divided into two groups (12 cases in each group) .Pre‐Endoscopic Blatchford and Rockall scores were calculated for all pa‐tients .All patients underwent endoscopy(EGD) within 24 hours .The timing of EGD was based on clinical scores in control group , and on VCE in observation group .Positive VCE was defined as red blood ,clot or coffee grounds .Mean Rockall and Blatchford scores for all 24 patients were compared to differentiate high‐and low‐risk patients .Rockall and Blatchford scores were also com‐pared with VCE findings .Results A total of 13 out of 24 patients had high‐risk stigmata on EGD ,with the mean Rockall and Blatchford scores of 3 and 13 respectively .Meanwhile ,the mean Rockall and Blatchford scores of the other 11 patients were 2 and 11 .There was no statistically significant difference between the Blatchford scores of the two groups(95% CI:5 .2‐1 .4 ;P=0 .23) . Also there was no statistically significant difference between the Rockall scores of the two groups(95% CI:2 .2‐0 .3;P=0 .12) .In the subgroup of 12 patients who underwent VCE ,9/12 had positive findings confirmed at EGD afterward ,compared with the other 3 patients with negative VCE and endoscopy .Conclusion Both the Rockall and the Blatchford scores are not accurate to predict the degree of risk in patients with AUGIB identified at EGD .However ,VCE is sensitive and specific enough to a better risk stratifica‐tion tool .