1.Comparison of Transoral Anterior Jefferson-Fracture Reduction Plate and Posterior Screw-Rod Fixation in C1-Ring Osteosynthesis for Unstable Atlas Fractures
Mandi CAI ; Yifeng WU ; Rencai MA ; Junlin CHEN ; Zexing CHEN ; Chenfu DENG ; Xinzhao HUANG ; Xiangyang MA ; Xiaobao ZOU
Neurospine 2024;21(2):544-554
Objective:
To compare the clinical outcomes of transoral anterior Jefferson-fracture reduction plate (JeRP) and posterior screw rod (PSR) surgery for unstable atlas fractures via C1-ring osteosynthesis.
Methods:
From June 2009 to June 2022, 49 consecutive patients with unstable atlas fractures were treated by transoral anterior JeRP fixation (JeRP group) or PSR fixation (PSR group) and followed up at General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of PLA; 30 males and 19 females were included. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), distance to anterior arch fracture (DAAF), distance to posterior arch fracture (DPAF), lateral mass displacement (LMD), Redlund-Johnell value, postoperative complications, and fracture healing rate were retrospectively collected and statistically analyzed.
Results:
Compared with that in the PSR group, the bleeding volume in the JeRP group was lower, and the length of hospital stay was longer. The VAS scores and NDIs of both groups were significantly improved after surgery. The postoperative DAAF and DPAF were significantly smaller after surgery in both groups. Compared with the significantly shorter DPAF in the PSR group, the JeRP group had a smaller DAAF, shorter LMDs and larger Redlund-Johnell value postoperatively and at the final follow-up. The fracture healing rate at 3 months after surgery was significantly greater in the JeRP group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Both C1-ring osteosynthesis procedures for treating unstable atlas fractures yield satisfactory clinical outcomes. Transoral anterior JeRP fixation is more effective than PSR fixation for holistic fracture reduction and short-term fracture healing, but the hospital stay is longer.
2.Comparison of Transoral Anterior Jefferson-Fracture Reduction Plate and Posterior Screw-Rod Fixation in C1-Ring Osteosynthesis for Unstable Atlas Fractures
Mandi CAI ; Yifeng WU ; Rencai MA ; Junlin CHEN ; Zexing CHEN ; Chenfu DENG ; Xinzhao HUANG ; Xiangyang MA ; Xiaobao ZOU
Neurospine 2024;21(2):544-554
Objective:
To compare the clinical outcomes of transoral anterior Jefferson-fracture reduction plate (JeRP) and posterior screw rod (PSR) surgery for unstable atlas fractures via C1-ring osteosynthesis.
Methods:
From June 2009 to June 2022, 49 consecutive patients with unstable atlas fractures were treated by transoral anterior JeRP fixation (JeRP group) or PSR fixation (PSR group) and followed up at General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of PLA; 30 males and 19 females were included. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), distance to anterior arch fracture (DAAF), distance to posterior arch fracture (DPAF), lateral mass displacement (LMD), Redlund-Johnell value, postoperative complications, and fracture healing rate were retrospectively collected and statistically analyzed.
Results:
Compared with that in the PSR group, the bleeding volume in the JeRP group was lower, and the length of hospital stay was longer. The VAS scores and NDIs of both groups were significantly improved after surgery. The postoperative DAAF and DPAF were significantly smaller after surgery in both groups. Compared with the significantly shorter DPAF in the PSR group, the JeRP group had a smaller DAAF, shorter LMDs and larger Redlund-Johnell value postoperatively and at the final follow-up. The fracture healing rate at 3 months after surgery was significantly greater in the JeRP group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Both C1-ring osteosynthesis procedures for treating unstable atlas fractures yield satisfactory clinical outcomes. Transoral anterior JeRP fixation is more effective than PSR fixation for holistic fracture reduction and short-term fracture healing, but the hospital stay is longer.
3.Comparison of Transoral Anterior Jefferson-Fracture Reduction Plate and Posterior Screw-Rod Fixation in C1-Ring Osteosynthesis for Unstable Atlas Fractures
Mandi CAI ; Yifeng WU ; Rencai MA ; Junlin CHEN ; Zexing CHEN ; Chenfu DENG ; Xinzhao HUANG ; Xiangyang MA ; Xiaobao ZOU
Neurospine 2024;21(2):544-554
Objective:
To compare the clinical outcomes of transoral anterior Jefferson-fracture reduction plate (JeRP) and posterior screw rod (PSR) surgery for unstable atlas fractures via C1-ring osteosynthesis.
Methods:
From June 2009 to June 2022, 49 consecutive patients with unstable atlas fractures were treated by transoral anterior JeRP fixation (JeRP group) or PSR fixation (PSR group) and followed up at General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of PLA; 30 males and 19 females were included. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), distance to anterior arch fracture (DAAF), distance to posterior arch fracture (DPAF), lateral mass displacement (LMD), Redlund-Johnell value, postoperative complications, and fracture healing rate were retrospectively collected and statistically analyzed.
Results:
Compared with that in the PSR group, the bleeding volume in the JeRP group was lower, and the length of hospital stay was longer. The VAS scores and NDIs of both groups were significantly improved after surgery. The postoperative DAAF and DPAF were significantly smaller after surgery in both groups. Compared with the significantly shorter DPAF in the PSR group, the JeRP group had a smaller DAAF, shorter LMDs and larger Redlund-Johnell value postoperatively and at the final follow-up. The fracture healing rate at 3 months after surgery was significantly greater in the JeRP group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Both C1-ring osteosynthesis procedures for treating unstable atlas fractures yield satisfactory clinical outcomes. Transoral anterior JeRP fixation is more effective than PSR fixation for holistic fracture reduction and short-term fracture healing, but the hospital stay is longer.
4.Comparison of Transoral Anterior Jefferson-Fracture Reduction Plate and Posterior Screw-Rod Fixation in C1-Ring Osteosynthesis for Unstable Atlas Fractures
Mandi CAI ; Yifeng WU ; Rencai MA ; Junlin CHEN ; Zexing CHEN ; Chenfu DENG ; Xinzhao HUANG ; Xiangyang MA ; Xiaobao ZOU
Neurospine 2024;21(2):544-554
Objective:
To compare the clinical outcomes of transoral anterior Jefferson-fracture reduction plate (JeRP) and posterior screw rod (PSR) surgery for unstable atlas fractures via C1-ring osteosynthesis.
Methods:
From June 2009 to June 2022, 49 consecutive patients with unstable atlas fractures were treated by transoral anterior JeRP fixation (JeRP group) or PSR fixation (PSR group) and followed up at General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of PLA; 30 males and 19 females were included. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), distance to anterior arch fracture (DAAF), distance to posterior arch fracture (DPAF), lateral mass displacement (LMD), Redlund-Johnell value, postoperative complications, and fracture healing rate were retrospectively collected and statistically analyzed.
Results:
Compared with that in the PSR group, the bleeding volume in the JeRP group was lower, and the length of hospital stay was longer. The VAS scores and NDIs of both groups were significantly improved after surgery. The postoperative DAAF and DPAF were significantly smaller after surgery in both groups. Compared with the significantly shorter DPAF in the PSR group, the JeRP group had a smaller DAAF, shorter LMDs and larger Redlund-Johnell value postoperatively and at the final follow-up. The fracture healing rate at 3 months after surgery was significantly greater in the JeRP group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Both C1-ring osteosynthesis procedures for treating unstable atlas fractures yield satisfactory clinical outcomes. Transoral anterior JeRP fixation is more effective than PSR fixation for holistic fracture reduction and short-term fracture healing, but the hospital stay is longer.
5.Comparison of Transoral Anterior Jefferson-Fracture Reduction Plate and Posterior Screw-Rod Fixation in C1-Ring Osteosynthesis for Unstable Atlas Fractures
Mandi CAI ; Yifeng WU ; Rencai MA ; Junlin CHEN ; Zexing CHEN ; Chenfu DENG ; Xinzhao HUANG ; Xiangyang MA ; Xiaobao ZOU
Neurospine 2024;21(2):544-554
Objective:
To compare the clinical outcomes of transoral anterior Jefferson-fracture reduction plate (JeRP) and posterior screw rod (PSR) surgery for unstable atlas fractures via C1-ring osteosynthesis.
Methods:
From June 2009 to June 2022, 49 consecutive patients with unstable atlas fractures were treated by transoral anterior JeRP fixation (JeRP group) or PSR fixation (PSR group) and followed up at General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of PLA; 30 males and 19 females were included. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), distance to anterior arch fracture (DAAF), distance to posterior arch fracture (DPAF), lateral mass displacement (LMD), Redlund-Johnell value, postoperative complications, and fracture healing rate were retrospectively collected and statistically analyzed.
Results:
Compared with that in the PSR group, the bleeding volume in the JeRP group was lower, and the length of hospital stay was longer. The VAS scores and NDIs of both groups were significantly improved after surgery. The postoperative DAAF and DPAF were significantly smaller after surgery in both groups. Compared with the significantly shorter DPAF in the PSR group, the JeRP group had a smaller DAAF, shorter LMDs and larger Redlund-Johnell value postoperatively and at the final follow-up. The fracture healing rate at 3 months after surgery was significantly greater in the JeRP group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Both C1-ring osteosynthesis procedures for treating unstable atlas fractures yield satisfactory clinical outcomes. Transoral anterior JeRP fixation is more effective than PSR fixation for holistic fracture reduction and short-term fracture healing, but the hospital stay is longer.
6.Preliminary application of self-designed posterior reduction forceps for atlantoaxial dislocation in treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation
Xiangyang MA ; Xiaobao ZOU ; Haozhi YANG ; Shuang ZHANG ; Chenfu DENG ; Rencai MA ; Junlin CHEN ; Hong XIA
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2023;25(10):853-858
Objective:To evaluate the preliminary clinical application of our self-designed posterior reduction forceps for atlantoaxial dislocation in the reduction and fixation of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation with simple posterior screw-rod system.Methods:Our posterior reduction forceps was self-designed and developed to assist simple posterior screw-rod system in the treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation based on the posterior atlantoaxial screw-rod system. A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 5 patients with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation who had been treated from January 2021 to October 2022 at Department of Spine Surgery, General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of PLA with our self-designed posterior reduction forceps. There were 2 males and 3 females, aged 53, 62, 45, 32 and 48 years, respectively. Diagnosis: 1 case of free odontoid process combined with atlantoaxial dislocation, 2 cases of atlantoaxial dislocation, and 2 cases of old odontoid process fracture combined with atlantoaxial dislocation. Respectively, their preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were 9, 11, 12, 13 and 10 points and their atlanto-dental intervals (ADI) 9.8, 7.4, 6.6, 6.4 and 8.5 mm. Postoperatively, atlantoaxial reduction and spinal cord compression were evaluated by X-ray, CT, and MRI examinations, and internal fixation, atlanto-axial sequence, and bone graft fusion by X-ray and CT examinations. One week after surgery, the JOA scores were used to evaluate the patients' neurological function and the ADI was measured to evaluate the atlantoaxial reduction.Results:The surgery was successfully performed in the 5 patients, with no intraoperative complications like neurovascular injuries to the spinal cord. The postoperative atlantoaxial reduction was satisfactory, the position of internal fixation was good, the compression to the spinal cord was relieved, and the clinical symptoms were significantly improved. At 1 week after surgery, respectively, the JOA score: 13, 14, 14, 15 and 13; the ADI: 2.6, 2.1, 1.8, 1.5 and 2.2 mm; the follow-up time: 3, 6, 12, 9 and 6 months; the bone fusion time: 3, 3, 6, 6 and 3 months. Follow-ups revealed no loosening or fracture of internal fixation, good atlanto-axial sequence, and no recurrence of dislocation.Conclusion:Our self-designed posterior reduction forceps for atlantoaxial dislocation can assist the simple posterior screw-rod system to treat irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation, leading to good preliminary clinical outcomes.