In hepatoblastoma, encouraging cure rates have been achieved with recent advances in chemotherapy and surgical techniques. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of combined therapeutic modalities and surgical resection in hepatoblastoma. Fifteen cases of hepatoblastoma were treated from January 1993 to August 2000. Six patients had resectable tumors at initial diagnosis. All underwent surgical resection and in four patients postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was needed. Nine out of 15 patients had unresectbale tumors at initial diagnosis, and preoperative chemotherapy was applied. There was one operative mortality and 14 patients showed good prognosis after surgery. Although various treatment modalities should be combined for the unresectable hepatoblastoma, surgical resection remains the major curative procedure.
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Diagnosis ; Drug Therapy ; Hepatoblastoma* ; Humans ; Mortality ; Prognosis

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on the prognosis in cervical cancer patients with intermediate- or high-risk factors after radical hysterectomy (RH) compared to that for adjuvant radiotherapy (AR). METHODS: The Embase and MEDLINE databases and the Cochrane Library were searched for published studies comparing cervical cancer patients who received AC with those who received AR after RH. The endpoints were patient oncologic outcome. Random-effects meta-analytical models were used to calculate the pooled estimates of the effect of AC on mortality/recurrence. RESULTS: Two randomized trials and eleven observational studies (AC, 942 patients; AR, 1,721 patients) met our search criteria. There were no significant differences in mortality and any recurrence between two groups. The results for distant recurrence favored the AC group (pooled odds ratio: 0.69; 95% confidence interval: 0.54–0.88; p=0.03). In subgroup analyses (for study design, histology, indication for adjuvant treatment, AR type, AC type, and lymph node metastasis), there was no significant increase in mortality and recurrence for AC compared with that for AR. CONCLUSION: Compared to AR, AC showed similar survival outcomes in cervical cancer patients undergoing RH and also appeared to reduce the risk of distant recurrence.
Chemoradiotherapy ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant* ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Lymph Nodes ; Mortality ; Odds Ratio ; Prognosis ; Radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Recurrence ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms*

PURPOSE: We analyzed the clinicopathologic features, including treatment and outcome, and the survival rates between young and elderly patients with gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical information was reviewed for 1086 patients who had undergone a gastrectomy for gastric cancer during a 10-year period from 1990 to 1999, and the patients were assigned to one of two groups: the A group (<40 years of age, 91 patients) and the B group (> or =70 years of age, 85 patients). RESULTS: Compared to the B group, the A group had more females (47.3% vs 32.9%), a greater frequency of family history of cancer (15.4% vs 3.5%), and greater proportions of histologically poorly differentiated tumors (84.5% vs 40.2%) and Lauren diffuse-type tumors (69.1% vs 35.1%)(P<0.05). There was no difference in TNM stage. Cardiopulmonary co-morbidities were more in the B group, respectively, 1.1% (A group) and 11.8% (B group)(P<0.01), but the morbidity and the mortality were similar. Although there was no difference in curability, the B group underwent less aggressive operations in lymph-node dissection above D3 and had a shorter operation time, a smaller number of retrieved lymph nodes, and less adjuvant chemotherapy (P<0.001). However, there were no differences in the disease-specific 5-year survival rates, 67.6% and 67.0% respectively. CONCLUSION: Young and elderly patients with gastric cancer had different clinicopathological features. Especially, elderly patients underwent relatively less aggressive treatment. In spite of these facts, the outcome of treatment and the disease-specific survival rates were not different.
Aged* ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Female ; Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes ; Mortality ; Stomach Neoplasms* ; Survival Rate*

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Identifying pancreatic cancer patients at high risk of early mortality following surgical resection for pancreatic cancer is important to make optimal treatment decisions in multidisciplinary setting. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors related to early mortality in patients who underwent pancreatic resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We reviewed our institution's experience with all consecutive patients who underwent pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from January 2000 to December 2010. One thousand patients were eligible for our study. Fifty-three patients who did not meet the study criteria were excluded. Based on 12 months after surgery, patients were divided into early mortality group or the remaining group. We performed logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of early mortality. RESULTS: Among 947 patients who met our study criteria, 302 (31.9%) early mortality (defined as experiencing death within 12 months after surgery) occurred. Multivariate analysis revealed that patient age and surgery time period were statistically significant predictors of early mortality within six months after surgery. Poorly differentiated tumor and adjuvant chemotherapy were statistically significant predictors of early mortality within 12 months after surgery. Total pancreatectomy and lymphovascular invasion were significant (p<0.05) prognostic factors of early mortality within 6 or 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest followings to avoid early mortality after pancreatic resection: patients with multiple risk factors related to early mortality after pancreatectomy should be considered for alternative treatment; patient's general condition and surgical technique improvement are important; and adjuvant therapy should be taken into consideration.
Adenocarcinoma* ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Mortality* ; Multivariate Analysis ; Pancreas ; Pancreatectomy ; Pancreatic Neoplasms ; Prognosis ; Risk Factors

The aim of the present multi-institutional study was to assess the influence of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification on adjuvant chemotherapy eligibility and survival in a multi-institutional cohort of patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We retrospectively reviewed data from 416 patients who underwent RNU for UTUC at four Korean institutions between 2001 and 2013. The ASA-PS classification was obtained from the anesthesia chart. Locally advanced UTUC was defined as ≥ pT3 and/or pN1 disease. The influence of ASA-PS score on survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analyses and a multivariate Cox regression model. Patients with a higher ASA-PS class were less likely to be eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced UTUC (P = 0.016). Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that the high-risk ASA-PS group has a poorer overallsurvival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared to low risk ASA-PS groups in both the total and locally advanced UTUC cohorts. Based on multivariate Cox regression analysis, the high-risk ASA-PS category was an independent predictor for overall mortality (OM) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.919; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.017–3.619; P = 0.044) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) (HR, 2.120; 95% CI, 1.023–4.394; P = 0.043). In conclusion, high-risk ASA-PS score was independently associated with a lower survival rate in patients with UTUC after RNU. However, the influence of ASA-PS classification on survival was limited to locally advanced UTUC. The lower eligibility of patients in the high-risk ASA category for adjuvant chemotherapy may contribute to the lower survival rate in this group.
Anesthesia ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant* ; Classification ; Cohort Studies ; Humans ; Mortality ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate

Diffuse malignant mesothelioma is a rare malignant tumor having poor prognosis. There is still no widely acceptable staging system of the disease and pathologic diagnosis is difficult. Although surgical treatment for diffuse malignant mesothelioma has been controversial, extrapleural peumonectomy in selected patients could prolong the survival when it was combined with adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy. We experienced 4 cases of diffuse malignant mesothelioma for 7 years since 1992, they were treated with extrapleural pneumonectomy without early postoperative mortality. Three patients underwent adjuvant therapy after surgery; chemotherapy in two, and chemo-radiation therapy in one, but one patient could not receive adjuvant therapy because of postoperative complication of hypoxic brain damage due to cardiac torsion and empyema. In this article, we describe surgical experience of extrapleural pneumonectomy and discuss about the controversial points of the disease.
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Diagnosis ; Drug Therapy ; Empyema ; Humans ; Hypoxia, Brain ; Mesothelioma* ; Mortality ; Pneumonectomy* ; Postoperative Complications ; Prognosis

PURPOSE: For patients with Dukes' stage B and C rectal cancer, surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is considered to be the standard treatment. However, the drugs used in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), the method of administration, duration of adjuvant therapy and the frequencies of administration presently remain controversial topics. We investigated (1) the efficacy and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) chemotherapy for patients who had undergone curative resection and (2) the effect of dose related factors of 5-FU on survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 130 rectal cancer patients with Dukes' B or C stage disease who were treated with curative resection were evaluated. The adjuvant therapy consisted of two cycles of 5-FU/LV chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiotherapy with chemotherapy, and then 4~10 more cycles of the same chemotherapy regimen were delivered based on the disease stage. The cumulative dose of 5-FU per body square meter (BSA), actual dose intensity and relative dose intensity were obtained. The patients were divided into two groups according to the median value of each factor, and the patients' survival rates were compared. RESULTS: With a median follow-up duration of 52 months, the 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates of 130 patients were 57% and 73%, respectively. Loco- regional failure occurred in 17 (13%) of the 130 patients, and the distant failure rate was 27% (35/130). The chemotherapy related morbidity was minimal, and there was no mortality for these patients. The cumulative dose of 5-FU/ BSA had a significant effect on the 5-year overall survival for Dukes' C rectal cancer patients (p=0.03). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only the performance status affected the 5-year overall survival (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: An adjuvant therapy of radiotherapy and 5-FU/LV chemotherapy is effective and tolerable for Dukes' B and C rectal cancer patients. A rospective, multicenter, randomized study to evaluate the effects of the cumulative dose of 5-FU/BSA on survival is required.
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Disease-Free Survival ; Drug Therapy ; Fluorouracil ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Mortality ; Multivariate Analysis ; Radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Rectal Neoplasms* ; Survival Rate

BACKGROUND: Penile cancer is a rare malignancy associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Currently, the efficacy of adjuvant treatment (AT), including radiotherapy and chemotherapy, for penile cancer remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the prognostic factors for treatment outcomes and the efficacy of AT in consecutive patients who underwent penectomy for penile cancer at multiple Korean institutions between 1999 and 2013. METHODS: AT was defined as the administration of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both within 12 months after initial treatment. All patients were divided into two groups according to the AT status. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (median age 67.0 years) with a median follow-up after penectomy of 26.4 (interquartile range: 12.0–62.8) months were enrolled. Patients with AT had a significantly higher pathologic stage. However, no differences in age, histologic grade, or type of surgery were identified according to the presence of AT. The 3- and 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 79.0% and 33.0%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage ≥ III disease was an independent predictor of CSS and recurrence-free survival (RFS). However, AT was not associated with CSS and RFS. The type of primary surgical treatment and inguinal lymph node dissection at diagnosis were also not significantly associated with overall survival, CSS, or RFS. CONCLUSION: AJCC stage ≥ III disease, which mainly reflects lymph node positivity, is a significant prognosticator in patients with penile cancer. By contrast, AT does not seem to affect CSS and RFS.
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Diagnosis ; Drug Therapy ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Joints ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes ; Male ; Mortality ; Multivariate Analysis ; Penile Neoplasms* ; Prognosis ; Radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan is an active agent in colorectal cancer, producing 30~40% response rates when combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in metastatic colorectal cancer as first line therapy, however, the best combination schedules are not determined yet. We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan combined with bolus 5-fluorouracil, continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin every two weeks (LV5FU2 regimen) in recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer in Korean patients. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with measurable diseases previously untreated with chemotherapy other than adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled onto this study and received the study drugs between June 2000 and December 2001. Treatment consisted of irinotecan (180 mg/m2 over two hours on day 1) followed by leucovorin (200 mg/m2 over two hours), bolus 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m2 over next 22 hours) on day 1 and 2. Chemotherapy was repeated every two weeks until progressive disease. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients evaluable for response, 8 partial responses were observed with a response rate of 40%. Six additional patients achieved stable disease as their best response, and six progressed. The median time to progression was 5.0 months and median overall survival was 17.3 months. The most frequently observed grade 3~4 toxicities were neutropenia (18%) and diarrhea (4.8%). Two mortalities occurred, though not clearly related to treatment, before the end of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Irinotecan combined with LV5FU2 regimen was effective in advanced colorectal cancer with manageable side effects. Caution should be paid to elderly and poor performance patients to prevent treatment related mortality and morbidity.
Aged ; Appointments and Schedules ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Colorectal Neoplasms* ; Diarrhea ; Drug Therapy ; Drug Therapy, Combination* ; Fluorouracil* ; Humans ; Leucovorin* ; Mortality ; Neutropenia

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Hepatic resection has only guaranteed long-term survival in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) even in the era of effective chemotherapy. The definite role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is to improve outcomes of unresectable CRLMs, but it its role has not been defined for initially resectable CRLMs (IR-CRLMs). METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 226 patients, who had been diagnosed and treated for IR-CRLM between 2003 and 2008; the patients had the following pathologies: 10% had more than 4 nodules, 11% had tumors larger than 5 cm, and 61% had synchronous CRMLs. Among these patients, 20 patients (Group Y) were treated with NCT, and 206 (Group N) did not receive NCT according to their physician's preference. The median follow-up time was 34.1 months. RESULTS: The initial surgical plans were changed after NCT to further resection in 20% and to limited resection in 10% of 20 patients. Complication rates of Groups Y (30%) were indifferent from Group N (23%) (p=0.233), but intraoperative transfusions were more frequent in Group N (15%) than in Group Y (5%) (p=0.006). There was one case of hospital mortality (0.44%). Disease-free survival rates in Groups Y and N were 23% and 39%, respectively, and patient survival rates were 42% and 66% (p>0.05). By multivariate analysis, old age (> or =60 years), differentiation of primary tumor (poorly/mucinous), resection margin involvement, and no adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with poor patient survival; the number of CRLMs (> or =4) was associated with poor disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: NCT had neither a positive impact nor a negative impact on survival, even with intraoperative transfusion, as observed on operative outcomes for patients with IR-CRLM. Further study is required to elucidate the role of NCT for treatment of patient with IR-CRLMs.
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Disease-Free Survival ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Liver ; Medical Records ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Survival Rate