1.Accelerated Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Uterine Cervix Cancers.
Young Seok SEO ; Chul Koo CHO ; Seong Yul YOO ; Mi Sook KIM ; Kang Mo YANG ; Hyung Jun YOO ; Chul Won CHOI ; Kyung Hee LEE ; Eui Don LEE ; Sang Young RHU ; Suck Chul CHOI ; Moon Hong KIM ; Beob Jong KIM
The Journal of the Korean Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology 2008;26(1):24-34
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of the use of accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (AHRT) for locally advanced uterine cervix cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2000 and September 2002, 179 patients were identified with FIGO stage IIB, IIIB, and IVA cancers. Of the 179 patients, 45 patients were treated with AHRT (AHRT group) and 134 patients were treated with conventional radiotherapy (CRT group), respectively. Patients undergoing the AHRT regimen received a dose of 30 Gy in 20 fractions (1.5 Gyx2 fractions/day) to the whole pelvis. Subsequently, with a midline block, we administered a parametrial boost with a dose of 20 Gy using 2 Gy fractions. Patients also received two courses of low-dose-rate brachytherapy, up to a total dose of 85~90 Gy to point A. In the CRT group of patients, the total dose to point A was 85~90 Gy. The overall treatment duration was a median of 37 and 66 days for patients that received AHRT and CRT, respectively. Statistical analysis was calculated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method, the log-rank test, and Chi-squared test. RESULTS: For patients that received cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the local control rate at 5 years was 100% and 79.2% for the AHRT and CRT group of patients, respectively (p=0.028). The 5-year survival rate for patients with a stage IIB bulky tumor was 82.6% and 62.1% for the AHRT group and CRT group, respectively (p=0.040). There was no statistically significant difference for severe late toxicity between the two groups (p=0.561). CONCLUSION: In this study, we observed that treatment with AHRT with concurrent chemotherapy allows a significant advantage of local control and survival for locally advanced uterine cervix cancers.
Chemoradiotherapy
2.Does the Addition of Adjuvant Chemotherapy to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Improve the Survival of Patients with Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer?.
Cancer Research and Treatment 2003;35(5):369-372
No abstract available.
Chemoradiotherapy*
;
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant*
;
Humans
;
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms*
3.Neoadjuvant Treatment for Gastric Cancer.
Christoph SCHUHMACHER ; Daniel REIM ; Alexander NOVOTNY
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2013;13(2):73-78
Surgery is still considered to be the mainstay for the treatment of localized gastric cancer with negative margins (R0-resection) and an adequate lymph-node-dissection (D2-lymphadenectomy). Unfortunately, most cases of gastric cancer are only diagnosed at an advanced stage due to frequent recurrences after primary resection in curative intent. In order to improve prognosis after curative resection, in the recent past, patients with locally advanced tumors were subjected to a pre-, peri-, or postoperative treatment. Interestingly, postoperative chemotherapy has significantly improved survival after gastric resection in Asia, adjuvant radiochemotherapy is favored in North America and perioperative chemotherapy is considered as a treatment of choice in Europe indicating region specific approach towards the treatment. Recently there has also been growing evidence of positive outcomes of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy on patient survival. In the present article, we discuss the concepts of neoadjuvant treatment approach and provide recommendations to surgeons based on current evidence.
Asia
;
Chemoradiotherapy
;
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Europe
;
Humans
;
Neoadjuvant Therapy
;
North America
;
Prognosis
;
Recurrence
;
Stomach Neoplasms
4.Is There a Role for Adjuvant Therapy in R0 Resected Gallbladder Cancer?: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Se Il GO ; Young Saing KIM ; In Gyu HWANG ; Eun Young KIM ; Sung Yong OH ; Jun Ho JI ; Haa Na SONG ; Se Hoon PARK ; Joon Oh PARK ; Jung Hun KANG
Cancer Research and Treatment 2016;48(4):1274-1285
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the role of adjuvant therapy in stage I-III gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients who have undergone R0 resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data were collected on 441 consecutive patients who underwent R0 resection for stage I-III GBC. Eligible patients were classified into adjuvant therapy and surveillance only groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) between the two groups was performed, adjusting clinical factors. RESULTS: In total, 84 and 279 patients treated with adjuvant therapy and followed up with surveillance only, respectively, were included in the analysis. Before PSM, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was lower in the adjuvant therapy group than in the surveillance only group (50.8% vs. 74.8%, p < 0.001), although there was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (66.2% vs. 79.5%, p=0.089). After the PSM, baseline characteristics became comparable and there were no differences in the 5-year RFS (50.8% vs. 64.8%, p=0.319) and OS (66.2% vs. 70.4%, p=0.703) rates between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant therapy is not indicated in stage I-III GBC patients who have undergone R0 resection.
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Gallbladder Neoplasms*
;
Gallbladder*
;
Humans
;
Propensity Score
5.Less is more: role of additional chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer management
Radiation Oncology Journal 2019;37(2):67-72
Concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) has played the most important and central role in the definitive therapy for the patients with locoregionally advanced stage nasopharynx cancer. The addition of induction chemotherapy (IC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) to CCRT have been widely accepted with the rationale of improving distant control in the clinical practices. This review article investigated the role of IC and AC based on 11 recent meta-analysis publications, and found that the clinical benefits obtained by the additional IC or AC to CCRT, at the cost of the increased risks of more frequent and more severe side effects, seemed not big enough. More intervention is not always better, however, less seems frequently good enough. The author would speculate that ‘less is more’ and would advocate CCRT alone as the current standard.
Chemoradiotherapy
;
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Drug Therapy
;
Humans
;
Induction Chemotherapy
;
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms
6.Adjuvant Chemotherapy with or without Concurrent Radiotherapy for Patients with Stage IB Gastric Cancer: a Subgroup Analysis of the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors (ARTIST) Phase III Trial.
Youjin KIM ; Kyoung Mee KIM ; Min Gew CHOI ; Jun Ho LEE ; Tae Sung SOHN ; Jae Moon BAE ; Sung KIM ; Su Jin LEE ; Seung Tae KIM ; Jeeyun LEE ; Joon Oh PARK ; Young Suk PARK ; Ho Yeong LIM ; Won Ki KANG ; Se Hoon PARK
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2018;18(4):348-355
PURPOSE: We aimed to discuss the roles of radiation and chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment in patients with staged IB GC who were enrolled in the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in stomach tumors (ARTIST) trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among the 458 patients who were enrolled in the ARTIST trial, 99 had stage IB disease. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP, n=50) or chemoradiotherapy (XPRT, n=49). Survival analyses were performed in accordance with the AJCC 2010 staging system. RESULTS: According to the AJCC 2010 system, stage migration from IB to II occurred in 71% of the patients; 98% of the T2 N0 cases were reclassified as T3 N0, and 42% of the T1 N1 cases were reclassified as T1 N2. When comparing survival outcomes between the XPRT and XP arms for stage IB cancer (AJCC 2002), no significant difference in 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) between the 2 arms was found. (median 5-year DFS, not reached, P=0.256). The patients classified as having stage IB cancer (AJCC 2002) and reclassified as having stage II cancer (AJCC 2010) exhibited worse prognoses than those who remained in stage IB, although the difference was not statistically significant (5-year DFS rate, 83% vs. 93%). When we compared 5-year DFS in 70 patients with stage II (AJCC 2010), the addition of radiotherapy to XP chemotherapy did not show better outcome than XP alone (P=0.137). CONCLUSIONS: The role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of stage IB GC (AJCC 2002) warrants further investigation.
Arm
;
Capecitabine
;
Chemoradiotherapy
;
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant*
;
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant*
;
Cisplatin
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Drug Therapy
;
Humans
;
Prognosis
;
Radiotherapy*
;
Stomach Neoplasms*
;
Stomach*
7.Impact on Loco-regional Control of Radiochemotherapeutic Sequence and Time to Initiation of Adjuvant Treatment in Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Postoperative Concurrent Radiochemotherapy.
Haeyoung KIM ; Eui Kyu CHIE ; Yong Chan AHN ; Kyubo KIM ; Won PARK ; Won Sup YOON ; Seung Jae HUH ; Sung W HA
Cancer Research and Treatment 2014;46(2):148-157
PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the impact of radiochemotherapeutic sequence and time to initiation of adjuvant treatment on loco-regional control for resected stage II and III rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment outcomes for rectal cancer patients from two hospitals with different sequencing strategies regarding adjuvant concurrent radiochemotherapy (CRCT) were compared retrospectively. Pelvic radiotherapy was administered concurrently on the first (early CRCT, n=180) or the third cycle of chemotherapy (late CRCT, n=180). During radiotherapy, two cycles of fluorouracil were provided to patients in both groups. In the early CRCT group, median six cycles of fluorouracil and leucovorin were prescribed during the post-CRCT period. In the late CRCT group, two cycles of fluorouracil were administered in the pre- and post-CRCT periods. RESULTS: No significant differences in the 5-year loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) (92.5% vs. 95.6%, p=0.43) or overall survival and disease-free survival were observed between groups. Patients who began receiving adjuvant treatment later than five weeks after surgery had lower LRRFS than patients who received adjuvant treatment within five weeks following surgery (79% vs. 91%, p<0.01). The risk of loco-regional recurrence increased as the time to initiation of adjuvant treatment was delayed. CONCLUSION: In the current study, treatment outcomes were not significantly influenced by the sequence of adjuvant treatment but by the delay of adjuvant treatment for more than five weeks. Timely administration of adjuvant treatment is deemed important in achieving loco-regional tumor control for stage II/III rectal cancer patients.
Chemoradiotherapy*
;
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Drug Therapy
;
Fluorouracil
;
Humans
;
Leucovorin
;
Prognosis
;
Radiotherapy
;
Rectal Neoplasms*
;
Recurrence
;
Retrospective Studies
8.Postoperative Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma.
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2012;12(4):205-209
In gastric adenocarcinoma, high rates of loco-regional recurrences have been reported even after complete resection, and various studies have been tried to find the role of postoperative adjuvant therapy. Among them, Intergroup 0116 trial was a landmark trial, and demonstrated the definite survival benefit in adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, compared with surgery alone. However, the INT 0116 trial had major limitation for global acceptance of the INT 0116 regimen as an adjuvant treatment modality because of the limited lymph node dissection. Lately, several randomized studies that were performed to patients with D2-dissected gastric cancer were published. This review summarizes the data about patterns of failure after surgical resection and the earlier prospective studies, including INT 0116 study. Author will introduce the latest studies, including ARTIST trial and discuss whether external beam radiotherapy should be applied to patients receiving extended lymph node dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy.
Adenocarcinoma
;
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Humans
;
Lymph Node Excision
;
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Recurrence
;
Stomach Neoplasms
;
Tetrazolium Salts
9.Postoperative Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma.
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2012;12(4):205-209
In gastric adenocarcinoma, high rates of loco-regional recurrences have been reported even after complete resection, and various studies have been tried to find the role of postoperative adjuvant therapy. Among them, Intergroup 0116 trial was a landmark trial, and demonstrated the definite survival benefit in adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, compared with surgery alone. However, the INT 0116 trial had major limitation for global acceptance of the INT 0116 regimen as an adjuvant treatment modality because of the limited lymph node dissection. Lately, several randomized studies that were performed to patients with D2-dissected gastric cancer were published. This review summarizes the data about patterns of failure after surgical resection and the earlier prospective studies, including INT 0116 study. Author will introduce the latest studies, including ARTIST trial and discuss whether external beam radiotherapy should be applied to patients receiving extended lymph node dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy.
Adenocarcinoma
;
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Humans
;
Lymph Node Excision
;
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Recurrence
;
Stomach Neoplasms
;
Tetrazolium Salts
10.Postoperative chemoradiotherapy in high risk locally advanced gastric cancer.
Sanghyuk SONG ; Eui Kyu CHIE ; Kyubo KIM ; Hyuk Joon LEE ; Han Kwang YANG ; Sae Won HAN ; Do Youn OH ; Seock Ah IM ; Yung Jue BANG ; Sung W HA
Radiation Oncology Journal 2012;30(4):213-217
PURPOSE: To evaluate treatment outcome of patients with high risk locally advanced gastric cancer after postoperative chemoradiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2003 and May 2012, thirteen patients who underwent postoperative chemoradiotherapy for gastric cancer with resection margin involvement or adjacent structure invasion were retrospectively analyzed. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered in 10 patients. Median dose of radiation was 50.4 Gy (range, 45 to 55.8 Gy). RESULTS: The median follow-up duration for surviving patients was 48 months (range, 5 to 108 months). The 5-year overall survival rate was 42% and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 28%. Major pattern of failure was peritoneal seeding with 46%. Locoregional recurrence was reported in only one patient. Grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in 54% of the patients. However, there was only one patient with higher than grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSION: Despite reported suggested role of adjuvant radiotherapy with combination chemotherapy in gastric cancer, only very small portion of the patients underwent the treatment. Results from this study show that postoperative chemoradiotherapy provided excellent locoregional control with acceptable and manageable treatment related toxicity in patients with high risk locally advanced gastric cancer. Thus, postoperative chemoradiotherapy may improve treatment result in terms of locoregional control in these high risk patients. However, as these findings are based on small series, validation with larger cohort is suggested.
Chemoradiotherapy
;
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Cohort Studies
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Drug Therapy, Combination
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Recurrence
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Seeds
;
Stomach Neoplasms
;
Survival Rate
;
Treatment Outcome