1.A brief review of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation.
Karen S G CHUA ; Yee-Sien NG ; Samantha G M YAP ; Chek-Wai BOK
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2007;36(1):31-42
INTRODUCTIONThis article aims to provide an overview of the epidemiology, medical and rehabilitation issues, current evidence for traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation, recent advances and emerging practices. Special TBI population groups will also be addressed.
MATERIALS AND METHODSWe included publications indexed in Medline and the Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews from 1974 to 2006, relevant chapters in major rehabilitation texts and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America and accessed Internet publications.
RESULTSTBI has been implicated by the World Health Organisation to be a 21st century epidemic similar to malaria and HIV/AIDS, not restricted to the developed world. One third of patients may suffer severe TBI with long-term cognitive and behavioural disabilities. Injuries to the brain do not only damage the cerebrum but may give rise to a multisystem disorder due to associated injuries in 20% of cases, which can include complex neurological impairments, neuroendocrine and neuromedical complications. There is promising evidence of improved outcome and functional benefits with early induction into a transdisciplinary brain injury rehabilitation programme. However, TBI research is fraught with difficulties because of an intrinsically heterogeneous population due to age, injury severity and type, functional outcome measures and small samples. Recent advances in TBI rehabilitation include task-specific training of cognitive deficits, computer-aided cognitive remediation and visual-spatial and visual scanning techniques and body weight-supported treadmill training for motor deficits. In addition, special rehabilitation issues for mild TBI, TBI-related vegetative states, elderly and young TBI, ethical issues and local data will also be discussed.
Accidents, Traffic ; statistics & numerical data ; Brain Injuries ; complications ; prevention & control ; rehabilitation ; Humans ; Ossification, Heterotopic ; etiology ; Persistent Vegetative State ; rehabilitation ; Prognosis ; Rehabilitation ; methods ; Singapore ; Task Performance and Analysis
2.Results from a prospective acute inpatient rehabilitation database: clinical characteristics and functional outcomes using the Functional Independence Measure.
Yee Sien NG ; Heeyoune JUNG ; San San TAY ; Chek Wai BOK ; Yi CHIONG ; Peter A C LIM
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2007;36(1):3-10
INTRODUCTIONRehabilitation improves functional outcomes, but there is little data on the profiles and outcomes of patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation in Singapore. The aims of this paper were to document the clinical characteristics and functional outcomes, using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), of all patients admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit in a tertiary teaching hospital, and to identify and analyse factors significantly associated with better discharge functional scores and higher functional gains.
MATERIALS AND METHODSIn this prospective cohort study over a 4-year period, clinical and functional data for 1502 patients admitted consecutively to the Singapore General Hospital inpatient rehabilitation unit were charted into a custom-designed rehabilitation database. The primary outcome measures were the discharge total FIM scores, FIM gain and FIM efficiency. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify independent variables associated with better discharge FIM scores and FIM gain.
RESULTSThe mean age was 61.3 +/- 15.0 years and 57.2% of the patients were male. Stroke (57.9%) followed by spinal cord injury (9.7%) were the most common diagnoses. The average rehabilitation length of stay was 21.5 +/- 19.0 days. The mean admission total FIM score was 70.3 +/- 23.2 and the mean discharge total FIM score was 87.3 +/- 23.0, with this gain being highly significant (P <0.001). The mean FIM gain was 17.0 +/- 13.4 and FIM efficiency was 0.95 +/- 0.90 points/day. Factors associated with better functional outcomes were higher admission motor and cognitive FIM scores, male gender, a longer rehabilitation length of stay and the use of acupuncture. Factors associated with poorer functional outcomes were older age, clinical deconditioning, ischaemic heart disease, depression, pressure sores and the presence of a domestic worker as a caregiver.
CONCLUSIONSThe FIM is an easy-to-use, standardised and robust general measure of functional disability. Multiple demographic, clinical and socio-cultural variables are associated with the primary functional outcomes and should be taken into account in rehabilitation and discharge planning. Nevertheless, rehabilitation improves functional outcomes across a wide range of diagnoses. Further research should be aimed at evaluating long-term disability postdischarge from inpatient rehabilitation and translating these findings into improving rehabilitation and healthcare resource utilisation.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Prospective Studies ; Recovery of Function ; Regression Analysis ; Rehabilitation ; Singapore ; Treatment Outcome