1.Treatment and outcomes of high-risk neuroblastoma in Southeast Asia: a single-institution experience and review of the literature.
Anselm Chi-Wai LEE ; Chan Hon CHUI ; Robert KWOK ; Kim Shang LEE ; Chee Meng FONG ; Wilfred Hing-Sang WONG
Singapore medical journal 2023;64(5):319-325
INTRODUCTION:
In Europe and North America, the majority of children with high-risk neuroblastoma survive the disease. Elsewhere, the treatment outcomes are poor.
METHODS:
A retrospective review of children treated for high-risk neuroblastoma in a single institution in Singapore from 2007 to 2019 was carried out. Treatment consisted of intensive chemotherapy, surgery aimed at gross total resection of residual disease after chemotherapy, consolidation with high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell rescue, and radiotherapy to the primary and metastatic sites followed by maintenance treatment with either cis-retinoic acid or anti-disialoganglioside monoclonal antibody therapy. Survival data were examined on certain clinical and laboratory factors.
RESULTS:
There were 57 children (32 male) treated for high-risk neuroblastoma. Their mean age was 3.9 (range 0.7-14.9) years. The median follow-up time was 5.5 (range 1.8-13.0) years for the surviving patients. There were 31 survivors, with 27 patients surviving in first remission, and the five-year overall survival and event-free survival rates were 52.5% and 47.4%, respectively. On log-rank testing, only the group of 17 patients who were exclusively treated at our centre had a survival advantage. Their five-year overall survival rate compared to patients whose initial chemotherapy was done elsewhere was 81.6% versus 41.1% (P = 0.011), and that of event-free survival was 69.7% versus 36.1% (P = 0.032). Published treatment results were obtained from four countries in Southeast Asia with five-year overall survival rates from 13.5% to 28.2%.
CONCLUSION
Intensified medical and surgical treatment for high-risk neuroblastoma proved to be effective, with superior survival rates compared to previous data from Southeast Asia.
Child
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Infant
;
Child, Preschool
;
Adolescent
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Neuroblastoma/pathology*
;
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods*
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use*
;
Asia, Southeastern/epidemiology*
;
Combined Modality Therapy
2.A risk prediction score to identify patients at low risk for COVID-19 infection.
Wui Mei CHEW ; Chee Hong LOH ; Aditi JALALI ; Grace Shi EN FONG ; Loshini Senthil KUMAR ; Rachel Hui ZHEN SIM ; Russell Pinxue TAN ; Sunil Ravinder GILL ; Trilene Ruiting LIANG ; Jansen Meng KWANG KOH ; Tunn Ren TAY
Singapore medical journal 2022;63(8):426-432
INTRODUCTION:
Singapore's enhanced surveillance programme for COVID-19 identifies and isolates hospitalised patients with acute respiratory symptoms to prevent nosocomial spread. We developed risk prediction models to identify patients with low risk for COVID-19 from this cohort of hospitalised patients with acute respiratory symptoms.
METHODS:
This was a single-centre retrospective observational study. Patients admitted to our institution's respiratory surveillance wards from 10 February to 30 April 2020 contributed data for analysis. Prediction models for COVID-19 were derived from a training cohort using variables based on demographics, clinical symptoms, exposure risks and blood investigations fitted into logistic regression models. The derived prediction models were subsequently validated on a test cohort.
RESULTS:
Of the 1,228 patients analysed, 52 (4.2%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. Two prediction models were derived, the first based on age, presence of sore throat, dormitory residence, blood haemoglobin level (Hb), and total white blood cell counts (TW), and the second based on presence of headache, contact with infective patients, Hb and TW. Both models had good diagnostic performance with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.934 and 0.866, respectively. Risk score cut-offs of 0.6 for Model 1 and 0.2 for Model 2 had 100% sensitivity, allowing identification of patients with low risk for COVID-19. Limiting COVID-19 screening to only elevated-risk patients reduced the number of isolation days for surveillance patients by up to 41.7% and COVID-19 swab testing by up to 41.0%.
CONCLUSION
Prediction models derived from our study were able to identify patients at low risk for COVID-19 and rationalise resource utilisation.
Humans
;
COVID-19/epidemiology*
;
SARS-CoV-2
;
Hospitalization
;
Logistic Models
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Hemoglobins