Breast-contour preservation(BCP)encompasses all strategies to preserve the contour of the breast following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction (IBR). With the continuous advancement of breast surgery, postoperative outcomes and quality of life of breast cancer patients have been significantly improved. Previous studies reported on BCP as a new comprehensive parameter for evaluating outcomes of breast cancer treatment. Based on preoperative comprehensive evaluation of patients′ general condition, characteristic of breast tumor, and breast morphology, individualized surgical strategy is formulated to improve BCP for early-stage breast cancer and improve postoperative outcomes of patients. Combined with the morphological characteristics of Chinese women′s breasts, breast contour can be preserved not only by BCS and IBR, but also by nipple-areola complex-sparing mastectomy in some breast cancer patients, thereby reducing psychosomatic impact as a result of losing breast mound.

Objective:To investigate the efficacy and clinical value of two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction after total mastectomy for breast cancer patients.Methods:Thirty-two patients with breast cancer, who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy or skin-sparing mastectomy, primary skin expander implantation, and permanent implant replacement after radiotherapy from January 2018 to December 2020 in the Breast Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University were analyzed retrospectively. Record the operation time of the patient, the interval between replacement surgery and radiotherapy, prosthesis volume, the difference between the volume of 0.9% sodium chloride solution in the dilator and the volume of the prosthesis, the retention time of the postoperative drainage tube, the satisfaction of the breast shape and the complications after the replacement.Results:The average operation time was (67.81±19.71) min; the average time interval between replacement surgery and radiotherapy was (9.88±2.00) months; the average volume of 0.9% sodium chloride solution in the dilator was (225.47±56.83) mL, and the average prosthesis volume was (259.06±70.88) mL, the average difference between the volume of the prosthesis and the volume of 0.9% sodium chloride solution in the dilator was (33.59±14.88) mL; the volume of the prosthesis is increased by an average of (13.65±5.19)% compared with the dilator; the average time of drainage tube retained after the operation was (9.03±1.40) d; satisfaction with breast shape after replacement: excellent in 23 cases (71.9%), general in 8 cases (25.0%), poor in 1 case (3.1%); postoperative complications: incision fat liquefaction 1 case of dehiscence (3.1%), 2 cases of seroma (6.3%), no serious complications such as external exposure and removal of the prosthesis.Conclusions:For patients with breast cancer, who need breast reconstruction after mastectomy, the two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction in which the replacement operation will be carried out more than 6 months after radiotherapy is safe. Moreover, achieve better symmetry and aesthetic effect by releasing the capsule, reconstructing the inframammary fold, and necessary plastic surgery of the contralateral breast.

Objective:To explore the individualized surgical methods for elderly breast cancer patients.Methods:Elderly patients(aged≥70 years)with stage 0-Ⅲ breast cancer admitted to Beijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from January 2013 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.They were divided into three groups based on surgical methods: breast-conserving surgery, nipple-areola complex-sparing mastectomy and traditional mastectomy.Age, tumor size, lymph node involvement, hormone receptor status, anesthesia mode, surgical operation mode and patient prognosis were retrospectively analyzed.Results:A total of 144 patients(147 cases)were followed up for 8-96(36.5±10.7)months, with a median of 27 months.The overall survival rate was 88.9%, with breast cancer-related deaths at 6.3%, non-breast cancer-related deaths at 4.9%, local recurrence at 3.5%, and systemic metastasis at 5.6%.Among the three groups, 38.5%, 82.0% and 73.3%, respectively, received general anesthesia.Breast-conserving surgery showed the shortest operation time[(71.7±31.6)min vs.(84.8±24.8)min vs.(100.0±34.4)min, F=7.264, P=0.001], the lowest postoperative drainage volume[(39.5±75.4)ml vs.(154.92±135.6)ml vs.(334.1±287.2)ml, F=31.481, P<0.001]and the shortest drainage duration[(2.8±3.3)d vs.(6.3±2.8)d vs.(8.5±3.7)d, F=38.101, P<0.001]. Conclusions:The surgical treatment of elderly patients with breast cancer should be based on comprehensive evaluation and accurate molecular typing.Breast-conserving surgery is the preferred surgical method for elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive and cN0 breast cancer.Mastectomy with skin and nipple areola preservation where appropriate can improve the therapeutic effect and quality of life for elderly breast cancer patients.

Objective:To investigate the feasibility of using body surface marker localization method to determine the correct position of catheter tip (lower 1/3 of the superior vena cava or the junction of superior vena cava and right atrium) in totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) implantation via internal jugular vein approach.Methods:The clinical data of 220 patients who underwent TIVAP implantation in Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University from June 2019 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 168 patients used the internal jugular vein approach. According to the method implemented for determining the length of central venous catheter (CVC) during the operation, the patients were divided into two groups: 136 patients using the body surface marker localization method were defined as the study group; and the remaining 32 cases treated by the intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopic localization method were defined as the control group. The difference in the excellent or good rate of CVC tip position immediately after implantation and the time of implantation was compared between the two groups. In addition, the correlation between the length of CVC indwelling, height, age, and the distance between the catheter tip and tracheal carina was analyzed for the patients with right and left internal jugular vein catheterization. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for statistical distribution of measurement data. Normal distribution of measurement data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation ( ± s), independent sample t-test was used for comparison between groups. Chi-square test was used for comparison between counting data. With TIVAP catheter indenture length as dependent variable and height as independent variable, Pearson correlation analysis was performed, the relationship equation between ideal catheter indenture length and patient height was analyzed by unitary linear regression. Results:When the CVC tip was located at the second intercostal space, the third sternocostal joint and the third intercostal space, the corresponding probability of being in the correct position was 34.8%, 83.3% and 95.0% respectively. The third sternocostal joint or the third intercostal space had a higher probability of correct CVC tip location than the second intercostal space, and the difference were statistically significant ( P<0.001). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the possibility of the CVC tip located in the correct position between the third sternocostal joint and the third intercostal space ( P=0.149). Compared with the control group (before adjusting catheter position), the proportion of excellent or good CVC position in the study group was significantly improved (94.1% vs 46.9%), and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=41.99, P<0.001); while the total operation time was significantly shortened [(33.04±6.69) min vs (42.50±5.54) min], and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). There was a linear correlation between the length of CVC insertion and height. Indwelling catheter length via right internal jugular vein approach (cm) =0.159× height (cm)-1.284 ( r=0.597, r2=0.356, P<0.001); length of catheter indwelling through the left approach (cm) =0.097× height (cm) + 12.139 ( r=0.322, r2=0.104, P=0.020). Conclusions:The third sternocostal joint or the third intercostal space would be the corresponding correct surface landmark of the CVC tip when the body surface marker localization method was adopted during the TIVAP implantation via the internal jugular vein approach. Compared with the intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy localization, the operation time is significantly shortened with the application of the body surface marker localization method. This technique is simple and easy to master and has high reliability in determining the length of catheter and the position of CVC tip.