Objective To investigate the therapeutic effects,adverse effects,and patterns of failure of elective irradiation of lymphatic drainage area (extended-field) and involved-field irradiation in three-dimensional radiotherapy (3DRT) in patients with esophageal cancer via a Meta-analysis.Methods The databases Wanfang Data,CNKI,VIP,CBM,PubMed,Embase,and Cochrane Library were searched to collect the controlled clinical trials on extended-field irradiation and involved-field irradiation in 3DRT in patients with esophageal cancer.Stata 11.0 was used for data analysis.The odds ratio (OR) with 95％ confidence interval was used to describe the differences between two groups.Results According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,a total of 12 controlled clinical trials involving 1 095 patients with esophageal cancer were included in this meta-analysis.The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with the involved-field irradiation group,the extended-field irradiation group had a significantly reduced rate of out-field failure in patients with esophageal cancer who received 3DRT (OR=3.727,P=0.007),but showed significantly higher rates of grade ≥ 3 acute radiation pneumonitis and radiation esophagitis (acute radiation pneumonitis:OR =0.348,P =0.001;radiation esophagitis:OR =0.385,P =0.000).The two groups had similar 1-,2-,and 3-year local control rate and overall survival rate (local control rate:OR=0.966/0.946/0.732,P=0.837/0.781/0.098;overall survival rate:OR=0.952/1.149/0.768,P=0.756/0.422/0.120),as well as a similar distant metastasis rate (OR=0.986,P=0.937).Conclusions Compared with involved-field irradiation,extended-field irradiation can reduce the rate of out-field failure in patients with esophageal cancer who receive 3DRT.However,it does not have significant advantages in local control rate and overall survival rate and has an increased incidence rate of adverse effects.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of salvage radiotherapy for supraclavicular lymph node metastasis ( SLNM) after initial treatment in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods A total of 117 patients with SLNM after radical resection for esophageal cancer were enrolled as subjects from 2006 to 2012. All patients received three?dimensional radiotherapy with 1. 8?2. 0 Gy per cycle, 5 cycles a week. The survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan?Meier method and analyzed using the log?rank test. The Cox model was used for multivariate analysis. Results The follow?up rate was 100%. In all the patients, the 1?and 3?year overall survival (OS) rates were 38. 5% and 14. 1%, respectively. The 1?and 3?year OS rates were significantly higher in patients treated with salvage radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy ( n=100) than in patients without any salvage treatment (n=17)(42% vs. 18%,P=0. 008;17% vs. 0%, P=0. 008). The patients treated with radiochemotherapy ( n=32) had significantly higher 1?and 3?year OS rates than those treated with radiotherapy alone (n=68)(59% vs. 34%, 36% vs. 11%, P=0. 002) or without any salvage treatment (n=17)(59% vs. 18%, 36% vs. 0%, P=0. 002). Patients without visceral metastasis (n=80) had significantly higher 1?and 3?year OS rates than those with visceral metastasis ( n=37) ( 44% vs. 27%, P=0. 002;22% vs. 0%,P=0. 002) . Patients with supraclavicular doses of ≥60 Gy in salvage radiotherapy ( n=75) had significantly higher 1?and 3?year OS rates than those with supraclavicular doses of<60 Gy in salvage radiotherapy ( n=25) ( 75% vs. 25%,P=0. 000;24% vs. 8%,P=0. 000) . The multivariate analysis using the Cox model showed that supraclavicular doses of ≥60 Gy, mediastinal metastasis, visceral metastasis, and salvage treatment method were independent factors for survival ( P=0. 001,0. 015,0. 009, 0. 025) . Conclusions Salvage radiotherapy can improve the survival of patients with SLNM in esophageal cancer. Salvage radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy is highly recommended for patients with SLNM alone. A radiation dose of ≥60 Gy in salvage radiotherapy improves survival in patients.

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and analyze relevant prognostic factors of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy ( SIB-IMRT ) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods A total of 101 patients diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma received SIB-IMRT from 2009 to 2015. The prescribed dose of PTV was 5040 cGy/28 times ( 180 cGy/time) and the dose for planning gross tumor volume (PGTV) was 6020 cGy/28 times (215 cGy/time) or 6160 cGy/28 times ( 220 cGy/time) simultaneously. The total treatment time was 5. 5 weeks ( once a day, 5 times a week).The adverse events, mode of treatment failure,l-,3-and 5-year local control (LC) and overall survival ( OS) rates were observed. Results The quantity of patients who completed the 1-,3-and 5-year follow-up was 101, 84 and 45, respectively. The 1-,3-and 5-year LC rates were 81. 6％,70. 4％ and 68. 4％, respectively. The 1-, 3-and 5-year OS rates were 72. 3％, 49. 4％ and 45. 2％, respectively. The median survival time was 36 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that clinical staging ( stageⅠ/Ⅱ/Ⅲ) and tumor response ( complete remission/ partial remission/no remission ) were the prognostic factors of OS (P=0. 016,0. 000,0. 005,0. 000).There were no significant differences in the LC and OS between the two groups of 215 cGy and 220 cGy (P=0. 283,0. 951).The incidence rates of grade 1,2,3 acute pneumonitis were 10. 9％(11/101),2. 0％(2/101) and 2. 0％(2/101), respectively. The incidence rates of grade 1, 2, 3 acute esophagitis were 63. 4％( 64/101 ) , 10. 9％( 11/101 ) and 4. 0％( 4/101 ) , respectively. No acute esophageal perforation or hemorrhage occurred. Five patients experienced late pneumonitis ( two died) . One case developed late lemostenosis, two cases developed esophageal perforation and hemorrhage, and two patients experienced esophageal hemorrhage. The patients treated with a fractionated dose of 220 cGy had a higher incidence rate of acute pneumonitis and upper gastrointestinal adverse reactions than those receiving 215 cGy ( P= 0. 062, 0. 024 ) . The local failure and recurrence accounted for 62. 5％ of all treatment-related failures. Conclusions SIB-IMRT yields high long-term clinical efficacy and tolerable adverse events in the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Compared with the dose of 215 cGy, the fractionated dose of 220 cGy fails to improve LC and OS rates, whereas enhances the risk of adverse events. The clinical staging and short-term clinical efficacy are the prognostic factors of survival rate.

Objective To analyze and compare the outcomes of esophageal carcinoma treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) and late course boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy (LCB-IMRT).Methods We retrospectively analyzed 128 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with SIB-IMRT or LCB-IMRT at the fifth department of radiation oncology in our hospital,from January 2009 to August 2015.Propensity score matching analysis was used to balance the variables differences in the two groups.Survival,failure patterns and toxicities were observed and compared between the two groups.Results one hundred and eleven patients were finally included after propensity scores matching.The 1-,3-and 5-year local control rates and survival rates were 83.6％ vs.81.7％,70.8％ vs.46.3％ and 66.0％ vs.38.2％ in the whole group,respectively.The 1-,3-and 5-year local control rates of SIB-IMRT and LCB-IMRT group were 81.6％ vs.88.0％,72.3％ vs.67.6％ and68.5％ vs.60.8％,respectively (P＞0.05).The 1-,3-and 5-year survival rates of SIB-IMRT and LCB-IMRT group were 81.3％ vs.82.4％,51.7％ vs.36.7％ and 45.8％ vs.26.7％,respectively (P ＞ 0.05).There was no statistical difference between the two group in ≥ grade 3 toxicities (P ＞ 0.05).There were 40 (36.0％) patients result in treatment failure in all.The treatment failure rates in SIB-IMRT and LCB-IMRT group were 33.8％ (26/77) vs.41.2％ (14/34),respectively (P ＞ 0.05).The local failure accounted for 65.0％ (26/40) of all treatment-related failures.Conclusions The toxicities of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with SIB-IMRT and LCB-IMRT have no significant differences and were well tolerated.There were no significant differences in local control rates and survival rates between the two groups.However,SIB-IMRT had better trend than LCB-IMRT.Given SIB-IMRT's convenient manipulation,it could be a better choice in the treatment of advanced esophageal carcinoma.

Objective:To compare the efficacy and adverse events of salvage radiotherapy and other treatments for recurrent esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy in this Meta-analysis.Methods:Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang data were searched from the inception to April 2020 to collect the clinical trials which comparatively analyzed the efficacy and safety between radiotherapy and other treatments for recurrent esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. RR and 95% CI were used to describe the differences among different groups. Results:According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 11 clinical trials involving 842 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the overall survival in the salvage radiotherapy group was significantly lower than that in the salvage esophagectomy group ( RR=0.40, 95% CI: 0.27-0.61, P<0.001), whereas significantly higher than that in the chemotherapy group ( RR=2.91, 95% CI: 1.43-5.95, P=0.003). There was no significant difference in the treatment-related mortality between the salvage radiotherapy and salvage esophagectomy groups ( RR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.14-1.98, P=0.350), but the incidence was significantly higher in the salvage esophagectomy group (1.7%-11.4% vs. 1.9%-2.8%). Conclusion:Salvage radiotherapy is an effective treatment for recurrent esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy, which can be regarded as one choice for clinical patients.

Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. Under the premise of effective systemic treatment, selecting patients who may benefit from local radiotherapy can effectively relieve symptoms and improve quality of life, and it is expected to prolong the survival time of patients. Moreover, immunotherapy plays an increasingly significant role in advanced esophageal cancer, and the efficacy of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy is promising.