Objective: To evaluate the clinical effects of CGF membrane for repairing the oral mucosa defects. Methods: 39 patients were selected with oral mucosa defects after surgical resections. 19 defects were covered by autologous CGF membranes as the experimental group. 20 defects were not covered by membrane as the control group. Regular follow-up were performed at one week, two weeks, three weeks, one month, two months, three months after the operations. And wound healings were compared in the groups. Results: CGF membranes of the 19 patients in the experimental group survived completely. And no infection occurred. The wound healing rate of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group at two weeks, three weeks and one month after the operations. And the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The VAS score of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group at one week, two weeks, three weeks and one month(P<0.05). The mean score of VSS score in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions Repair of the oral mucosa defects with CGF membrane can shorten the period of wound healing, relieve the postoperative discomfort and reduce the scar. It was a safe and effective method worthy to be popularized.

Objective: To compare the short-term and long-term results of thoracoscopic and open pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: The clinical data of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent pneumonectomy in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Qingdao University Hospital from January 2008 to December 2016 were collected. Totally 142 patients (55 in the thoracoscopic group and 87 in the open group) were included in the study. A total of 29 pairs of patients were successfully matched by propensity score matching (PSM). Perioperative outcomes and overall survival were compared between the two groups using t test, χ² test, Kaplan-Meier curve and Log-rank test, respectively. Results: Camparion with open group, the thoracoscopic group had longer operative time ((209.7±70.2) minutes vs. (171.3±43.5) minutes, t=2.50, P=0.02), more mediastinal lymph node dissection (M(Q_R): 17(9) vs. 11(10), W=388, P=0.02) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (7.0(3.5) vs. 9.0(3.0), W=285, P=0.03). There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss, postoperative drainage time, dissected lymph node number, dissected lymph node station and perioperative complications. After PSM, there were no signifificant differences found in 3-year survival (71.4% vs. 48.1%, P=0.10) and 3-year disease-free survival (67.4% vs. 47.2%, P=0.13) between the two groups. Conclusion Thoracoscopic pneumonectomy is safe and feasible for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with more mediastinal lymph node dissection and accelerating recovery, and equivalent long-term prognosis when compared with open approach.