We report our experience with a case of performing laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy along with pancreas-preserving splenectomy for treating early gastric cancer. Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy was planned for a 62-year-old male patient with a double early gastric cancer located in the upper and lower third of the stomach. Five trocars were placed and we used a harmonic scalpel to dissect the greater curvature. Enlarged splenic hilar lymph node was encountered and they were proved to be metastasis by frozen section biopsy. We then performed total gastrectomy with pancreas-preserving splenectomy for the purpose of completely dissecting the lymph nodes along the splenic artery and splenic hilum. We created a 4 cm sized longitudinal mini-laparotomy below the xiphoid process to remove the specimen, and anastomosis was done via the Roux-en-Y method. The patient was discharged on the 9th postoperative days after an uneventful recovery. Our experience shows that laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with pancreas-preserving splenectomy is a relatively safe procedure for treating upper third early gastric cancer with metastatic splenic hilar lymph nodes.
Biopsy ; Frozen Sections ; Gastrectomy* ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Splenectomy* ; Splenic Artery ; Stomach ; Stomach Neoplasms* ; Surgical Instruments

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We compared the efficacy and safety of the second-generation everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and the third generation biolimus-eluting stent (BES) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: We analyzed 629 consecutive patients (mean age 65.1 +/- 11.2 years, 426 males) with AMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from February 2008 to April 2012. They were divided into two groups according to stent type (EES group, n = 426; BES group, n = 203). The primary end-point was 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, non-target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization. The secondary end-point was 2-year target lesion failure (TLF). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, except that the patients with EES had a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (34.7 vs. 22.7%, p = 0.002) and were older (67.1 +/- 11.3 vs. 64 +/- 12.9 years, p = 0.039) compared with the patients with BES. After propensity score matching, 2-year clinical outcomes showed no differences in composite MACEs or TLF between the two groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that stent type was not a predictor of 2-year mortality or MACEs. However, older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.037, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.014-1.060, p = 0.001), diabetes mellitus (HR 2.247, 95% CI 1.426-3.539, p = 0.001) and a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 45% (HR 3.007, 95% CI 1.978-4.573, p = 0.001) were independent predictors for 2-year MACEs in patients undergoing EES or BES. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BES had similar clinical 2-year outcomes compared with EES patients with AMI.
Diabetes Mellitus ; Humans ; Mortality ; Myocardial Infarction* ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Prevalence ; Prognosis ; Propensity Score ; Stents* ; Stroke Volume

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Delay in symptom-to-door time (SDT) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is the most important factor in the prediction of short and long-term mortality. The purpose of this study was to investigate the social and clinical factors affecting SDT in patients with STEMI. METHODS: We analyzed 784 patients (61.0 +/- 13.2 years, 603 male) diagnosed with STEMI from November 2005 to February 2012. The patients were divided into four groups according to SDT: Group I (n = 163, < or = 1 h), Group II (n = 183, 1-2 h), Group III (n = 142, 2-3 h) and Group IV (n = 296, > 3 h). RESULTS: Delay in SDT increased with age (Group I, 58.4 +/- 12.0; Group II, 59.4 +/- 13.3; Group III, 62.0 +/- 12.8; Group IV, 63.0 +/- 13.8 years, p = 0.001). In 119 patients, transportation was less frequently used as the delay in SDT (41.7% vs. 29.0% vs. 26.1% vs. 9.8%, p < 0.001). By multiple logistic regression analysis, family history [OR, 0.488; CI, 0.248-0.959; p = 0.037], previous ischemic heart disease [OR, 0.572; CI, 0.331-0.989; p = 0.045], no occupation [OR, 1.600; CI, 1.076-2.380; p = 0.020] and method of transportation [OR, 0.353; CI, 0.239-0.520; p < 0.001] were independent predictors of delay in SDT. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that general education about cardiovascular symptoms and a prompt emergency call could be important to reduce SDT in STEMI.
Education ; Emergencies ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Mortality ; Myocardial Infarction* ; Myocardial Ischemia ; Occupations ; Transportation