1.Aerobic Capacity and Obesity Ratio of Korea Firefighters by Job Duties:Implications for Fitness Management
Ji-Been KIM ; Min-Geon JE ; Chae-Been KIM ; Jung-Jun PARK ; Hyun-Joo KANG ; Wook SONG ; Chung-Gun LEE ; Yeon-Soon AHN ; Han-Joon LEE ; Dong-Il SEO
The Korean Journal of Sports Medicine 2024;42(1):23-30
Purpose:
Firefighting duties range from field roles such as suppression, rescue, and emergency medical services (EMS) to various administrative tasks. Despite these differences, they face uniform fitness standards in Korea. This study seeks to define distinct fitness needs for each duty and provide data for customized standards.
Methods:
One hundred seventy-six Korean male firefighters participated, categorized into suppression (n=76), rescue (n=22), administrative (n=27), and EMS (n=51) roles. All underwent maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) tests for aerobic capacity, with body composition measured using bioelectrical impedance and height recorded with a stadiometer.
Results:
The VO2 max (mL/kg/min) among Korean male firefighters varied across different job duties: suppression (39.96±5.84), rescue (44.84±4.85), administration (40.27±7.01), and EMS (40.51±6.75). Rescue had the highest VO2 max, which was significantly higher (p=0.013). The body mass index (BMI, kg/m2 ) values were as follows: suppression (25.07±2.55), rescue (24.95±1.71), EMS (24.33±3.21), and administration (25.10±2.48). There was no statistically significant difference in BMI values (p=0.464).
Conclusion
This study evaluated the VO2 max and BMI of South Korean male firefighters according to their job duties. It found that 54.5% did not meet the recommended VO2 max standard of 42 mL/kg/min for their activities, and 77.5% had a BMI indicating overweight or higher. However, it is important to note that not every firefighting duty requires high fitness levels. The key is ensuring firefighters possess the fitness necessary for their specific roles to maintain safety and efficiency. The study aims to provide data for creating fitness management guidelines tailored to the diverse duties of firefighters.
2.Tracheal Rupture Following Insertion of Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube during Bronchoesophageal Fistular Repair: A case report.
Hyun Kyo LIM ; Yoon Jeong CHAE ; Kong Been IM ; Soon Yul KIM ; Kyung Bong YOON
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 1999;37(3):527-529
Tracheobronchial rupture following tracheal intubation with double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) is a rare complication, but may result in a massive air leakage with resultant pneumothorax, mediastinal emphysema and extensive subcutaneous emphysema in the postoperative period. We report a case of sustained laceration of the posterior membranous part of the trachea possibly due to overinflation of the double-lumen endobronchial tube. A 76-year-old, 45 kg, female was scheduled for a repair of her bronchopleural fistula. Following induction of anesthesia, intubation was performed with Robertshaw's DLT, and a tracheal cuff was inflated with 6 ml of air, but the sound of an air leak was heard coming from the patient's mouth during controlled ventilation. A further 5 ml of air was added 1 ml at a time into the tracheal cuff but the air leak sound continued. At that point, the sound was considered to originate from the bronchopleural fistula rather than from lack of sufficient air. After a thorough deflation of the tracheal cuff, 6 ml of air was reinjected and the operation was resumed. A 4 cm split was unexpectedly noticed in the posterior wall of the trachea during the operation and was repaired without complication.
Aged
;
Anesthesia
;
Female
;
Fistula
;
Humans
;
Intubation
;
Lacerations
;
Mediastinal Emphysema
;
Mouth
;
Pneumothorax
;
Postoperative Period
;
Rupture*
;
Subcutaneous Emphysema
;
Trachea
;
Ventilation
3.Scoring system to evaluate meaningful fecal impaction in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction with simple radiography (KUB)
Young Jae IM ; Kyeong Chae LEE ; Su Been LEE ; Kyeong KIM ; Kwanjin PARK
Investigative and Clinical Urology 2024;65(4):391-399
Purpose:
The management of bowel bladder disorder (BBD) has only been indicated for subjective constipation without objective evidence. We attempted to highlight the radiological findings in patients with BBD and construct a scoring system to identify patients with BBD prior to treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Forty-five patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) received polyethylene glycol for 2 months before bladder medication for LUTD. Based on partial response to LUTD following treatment, we divided the patients into LUTD-fecal impaction (FI) and LUTD not attributed to FI (LUTD-NFI) groups. Pre/post-treatment kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) were compared with respect to several radiographic parameters. Items with significant changes after treatment were included in the scoring system. The accuracy and inter-rater agreement were also evaluated.
Results:
Cecal dilation, descending colon dilation, fecal quality, and overall haziness were found to undergo significant changes after laxative treatment. We assigned 0 to 2 points for each item, with a total score of 8. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed a cutoff value of 5 between LUTD-FI and LUTD-NFI, with 79% sensitivity and 88% specificity. The scoring system was instructed to six doctors who were unaware of it and was then tested on previous patients, which showed a substantial concordance rate (κ=0.79, p<0.05).
Conclusions
Fecal scoring system based on KUB was beneficial in identifying children with LUTD attributed to FI. This may provide an opportunity to obtain objective FI data as an alternative to subjective assessment of constipation.
4.Scoring system to evaluate meaningful fecal impaction in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction with simple radiography (KUB)
Young Jae IM ; Kyeong Chae LEE ; Su Been LEE ; Kyeong KIM ; Kwanjin PARK
Investigative and Clinical Urology 2024;65(4):391-399
Purpose:
The management of bowel bladder disorder (BBD) has only been indicated for subjective constipation without objective evidence. We attempted to highlight the radiological findings in patients with BBD and construct a scoring system to identify patients with BBD prior to treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Forty-five patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) received polyethylene glycol for 2 months before bladder medication for LUTD. Based on partial response to LUTD following treatment, we divided the patients into LUTD-fecal impaction (FI) and LUTD not attributed to FI (LUTD-NFI) groups. Pre/post-treatment kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) were compared with respect to several radiographic parameters. Items with significant changes after treatment were included in the scoring system. The accuracy and inter-rater agreement were also evaluated.
Results:
Cecal dilation, descending colon dilation, fecal quality, and overall haziness were found to undergo significant changes after laxative treatment. We assigned 0 to 2 points for each item, with a total score of 8. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed a cutoff value of 5 between LUTD-FI and LUTD-NFI, with 79% sensitivity and 88% specificity. The scoring system was instructed to six doctors who were unaware of it and was then tested on previous patients, which showed a substantial concordance rate (κ=0.79, p<0.05).
Conclusions
Fecal scoring system based on KUB was beneficial in identifying children with LUTD attributed to FI. This may provide an opportunity to obtain objective FI data as an alternative to subjective assessment of constipation.
5.Scoring system to evaluate meaningful fecal impaction in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction with simple radiography (KUB)
Young Jae IM ; Kyeong Chae LEE ; Su Been LEE ; Kyeong KIM ; Kwanjin PARK
Investigative and Clinical Urology 2024;65(4):391-399
Purpose:
The management of bowel bladder disorder (BBD) has only been indicated for subjective constipation without objective evidence. We attempted to highlight the radiological findings in patients with BBD and construct a scoring system to identify patients with BBD prior to treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Forty-five patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) received polyethylene glycol for 2 months before bladder medication for LUTD. Based on partial response to LUTD following treatment, we divided the patients into LUTD-fecal impaction (FI) and LUTD not attributed to FI (LUTD-NFI) groups. Pre/post-treatment kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) were compared with respect to several radiographic parameters. Items with significant changes after treatment were included in the scoring system. The accuracy and inter-rater agreement were also evaluated.
Results:
Cecal dilation, descending colon dilation, fecal quality, and overall haziness were found to undergo significant changes after laxative treatment. We assigned 0 to 2 points for each item, with a total score of 8. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed a cutoff value of 5 between LUTD-FI and LUTD-NFI, with 79% sensitivity and 88% specificity. The scoring system was instructed to six doctors who were unaware of it and was then tested on previous patients, which showed a substantial concordance rate (κ=0.79, p<0.05).
Conclusions
Fecal scoring system based on KUB was beneficial in identifying children with LUTD attributed to FI. This may provide an opportunity to obtain objective FI data as an alternative to subjective assessment of constipation.
6.Scoring system to evaluate meaningful fecal impaction in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction with simple radiography (KUB)
Young Jae IM ; Kyeong Chae LEE ; Su Been LEE ; Kyeong KIM ; Kwanjin PARK
Investigative and Clinical Urology 2024;65(4):391-399
Purpose:
The management of bowel bladder disorder (BBD) has only been indicated for subjective constipation without objective evidence. We attempted to highlight the radiological findings in patients with BBD and construct a scoring system to identify patients with BBD prior to treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Forty-five patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) received polyethylene glycol for 2 months before bladder medication for LUTD. Based on partial response to LUTD following treatment, we divided the patients into LUTD-fecal impaction (FI) and LUTD not attributed to FI (LUTD-NFI) groups. Pre/post-treatment kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) were compared with respect to several radiographic parameters. Items with significant changes after treatment were included in the scoring system. The accuracy and inter-rater agreement were also evaluated.
Results:
Cecal dilation, descending colon dilation, fecal quality, and overall haziness were found to undergo significant changes after laxative treatment. We assigned 0 to 2 points for each item, with a total score of 8. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed a cutoff value of 5 between LUTD-FI and LUTD-NFI, with 79% sensitivity and 88% specificity. The scoring system was instructed to six doctors who were unaware of it and was then tested on previous patients, which showed a substantial concordance rate (κ=0.79, p<0.05).
Conclusions
Fecal scoring system based on KUB was beneficial in identifying children with LUTD attributed to FI. This may provide an opportunity to obtain objective FI data as an alternative to subjective assessment of constipation.