No abstract available.
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia* ; Cervix Uteri* ; Diagnosis* ; Female

Adenocarcinoma ; diagnosis ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia ; diagnosis ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Humans

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of cervicogram as primary screening test of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. METHODS: Total 294 women who had undergone cervicogram and pathologically diagnosed at YUMC between January and July 2003, were selected. Diagnostic accuracy of Pap smear, cervicogram and Pap smear combined with cervicogram were compared with pathologic diagnosis. Statistical analysis was performed by chi-square test (SPSS version 11.0). RESULTS: 1. Among 294 women, Pap smears were normal in 130 cases (44.2%) and abnormal in 164 cases (55.8%). The diagnostic accuracy between Pap smear and histology was as follows; sensitivity 72.0%, specificity 64.6%, positive predictive value 72.0%, negative predictive value 64.6%, false positive rate 28.0%, false negative rate 35.4%. 2. Cervicogram were normal in 202 cases (68.7%) and abnormal in 92 cases (31.3%). The diagnostic accuracy between cervicogram and histology was as follows; sensitivity 39.6%, specificity 79.2%, positive predictive value 70.7%, negative predictive value 31.0%, false positive rate 29.3%, false negative rate 49.0%. 3. Among 130 women with normal Pap smear, cervicogram were normal in 101 cases (77.7%) and abnormal in 29 cases (22.3%). The diagnostic accuracy between cervicogram with normal Pap smear and histology was as follows; sensitivity 26.1%, specificity 79.8%, positive predictive value 41.4%, negative predictive value 66.3%, false positive rate 58.6%, false negative rate 33.7%. 4. Among 164 women with abnormal Pap smear, Cervicograms were normal in 101 cases (61.6%) and abnormal in 63 cases (38.4%). The diagnostic accuracy between cervicogram with abnormal Pap smear and histology was as follows; sensitivity 44.9%, specificity 78.3%, positive predictive value 84.1%, negative predictive value 32.7%, false positive rate 15.9%, false negative rate 67.3%. CONCLUSION: Although adjunctive use of cervicogram to Pap smear in initial screening of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia showed higher specificity, higher negative predictive value and lower false negative rate compared to Pap smear alone, but, consideration in terms of lower sensitivity, lower positive predictive value, higher false positive rate and cost-effectiveness should be given in lieu of clinically applicating cervicogram with Pap smear as initial screening test.
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia* ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Mass Screening* ; Sensitivity and Specificity

To study the microbiological contamination of kitchen dishcloths in Chinese housholds, 1010 'in-use' kitchen dishcloths were collected from residential premises in Beijing and Shanghai, and they were sent to the laboratory for microbiological quality analysis. The aerobic plate counts for dishcloths were 10-109 cfu/cm2 in the range of 150 cfu/cm2 to 1.776×109 cfu/cm2 (Beijing) and 62.5 cfu/cm2 to 8.75×108 cfu/cm2 (Shanghai). Nineteen species of bacteria were detected in the dishcloths, most of which were conditional pathogenic bacteria. This study found a significant difference in the aerobic plate counts of dishcloths with regard to type, number of the days used, activities used for, and some family factors. The findings of the study highlight the potential for contamination of kitchen dishcloths within homes.
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia ; diagnosis ; Female ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Mass Screening ; Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix ; diagnosis

OBJECTIVE: To estimate false-negative rate of cervical smears in histologically confirmed squamous intraepithelial lesion and squamous cell carcinoma METHOD: From 1993 to 1998, total 186 cases of cervical smear performed within 1 year before histological confirmation squamous intraepithelial lesion and squamous cell carcinoma, were reviewed and the false negative rate of the each group was analyzed. RESULTS: 1. Histologic diagnosis of 186 cases includes 8 cases of low grade SIL, 87 cases of high grade SIL, 91 cases of squamous cell carcinoma. 2. Overall false negative rate was 18.8% (35/186). False negative rate of LSIL was higher (50%; 4/8) compared with the other two groups. (HSIL:23% ;20/87, SCC:12.1% ;11/91) 3. 18 of 35 false negative cases were reviewed. 8 cases(44.4%) were sampling error and 10 cases(55.6%) were interpretation error. 4. Estimated overall sampling error was 8-9% ; interpretation error 10-11%. CONCLUSION: Reducing the false negative rate of cervical smears, especially in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia lesion is important to save the patients from invasive cervical cancer. Further studies on the causes of false negatives and the efforts to eliminate these barriers are actually needed.
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell* ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; Selection Bias ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms ; Vaginal Smears*

This study was performed to demonstrate the efficacy of combination of cold-knife conization and cold-coagulation for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN). In addition, the accuracy of the colposcopic biopsy and Pap smear compare to conization was determined. Cold-coagulation was performed simultaneously in 151 patients after cold-knife conization for diagnosis and treatment of CIN from Jan. 1995 to Dec. 1996. Medical records and pathologic slides of those patients were reviewed. Histologic comparison between the Pap smear and conization specimens showed agreement with 70 % within one grade difference ; Histologic comparison between the colpodirected punch biopsy and conization specimens showed agreement with 80 %. The margin involvement of conization was seen in 35 patients(23 %). There was a tendency of increasing rate of positive cone margin with grade of the lesion : 14 %(1/7) in CIN 1, 20 %(2/10) in CIN 2, 35 %(31/88) in CIN 3, and 33 %(1/3) in microinvasive cervical cancer. Among these 35 patients, 11 patients underwent hysterectomy and showed residual disease in 4 patients(36 %). Recurrence of CIN was found in 4 patients(16 %) with positive cone margin and 1 patient(0.9 %) with negative cone margin. Bleeding was observed in 13 patients(9 %). Two patients underwent hysterectomy because of severe bleeding. These results suggest that cold-knife conization with cold-coagulation is an effective procedure to reduce recurrence rate of the patients with CIN regardless of status of cone margin and to reduce the severity of bleeding after conization.
Biopsy ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia* ; Conization* ; Diagnosis* ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Medical Records ; Recurrence ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

OBJECTIVE: The ras association domain family 1A (RASSF1A) gene plays an important part in carcinogenesis by inactivation via promoter hypermethylation in several cancers. We aimed to examine the effect of the RASSF1A Ala133Ser polymorphism on cervical carcinogenesis in reference to environmental factors, such as smoking and age at first sexual intercourse. METHODS: Seven hundred five patients who were diagnosed with cervical neoplasia and who had a positive results for human papillomavirus were enrolled to experimental group, and 641 of normal healthy women were enrolled as controls. All of the subjects were genotyped using the SNaPshot single base primer extension assay. RESULTS: Compared with RASSF1A TT/GT, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for RASSF1A GG was 1.4 (0.9-2.1) for invasive cervical cancer and 1.1 (0.7-1.7) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II or III. The risks for cervical cancer were higher in patients under 40 years old at diagnosis (1.6, 1.0-2.6), than in patients over 40 years old at diagnosis (1.0, 0.7-1.5). Women with RASSF1A GG who currently smoke had a 2.7 (1.3-5.9) times higher risk of cervical cancer. Women with RASSF1A GG who had an early age of first intercourse, as compared with RASSF1A TT/GT, were also at increased risk. CONCLUSION: The RASSF1A Ala133Ser polymorphism is associated with a higher risk of cervical cancer and particularly with an early onset of cervical carcinogenesis.
Adult ; Carcinogenesis ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia ; Coitus ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Odds Ratio ; Smoke ; Smoking ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms*

No abstract available.
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia/*diagnosis ; Female ; Human Papillomavirus DNA Tests/*methods ; Humans ; Papillomavirus Infections/*diagnosis ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/*diagnosis

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to assess the efficacy of large loop excision of transformation (LLETZ) and to evaluate of clinicopathological factors with the probability of residual disease. METHODS: Retrospective study was performed in 56 patients treated with LLETZ from September, 1998 to October, 2001 in department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Boramae Hospital. The patients underwent either immediate reoperation or monitoring with a cytologic smear and colposcopy. we investigate the significance of clinicopathological factors to predict residual disease after LLETZ. We used the Hybrid capture II test (Digene, USA) for presence of human papillomavirus (HPV). Residual disease was defined as histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). RESULTS: Histologic assesment after LLETZ showed margin involvements in 28.6% (16/56) of cases but the residual lesion was only seen in 21.4% (12/56). There was no other serious complication. Positive margins was significantly associated with severity of lesion but not presence of HPV. Severity of lesion and margin involvements was significantly associated with residual disease (p<0.05). But age of patients and the presence of HPV was not significantly associated with residual disease. CONCLUSION: LLETZ is an effective, quick and reliable procedure on accurate diagnosis of cervical pathology and conservative treatment of CIN. Margin status and severity of lesions could be used to predict residual disease.
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia* ; Colposcopy ; Diagnosis ; Equidae ; Gynecology ; Humans ; Obstetrics ; Pathology ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies

Conization is defined as excision of a cone-shaped or cylindrical wedge from the cervix uteri that includes the transformation zone and all or a portion of the endocervical canal. It is used for the definitive diagnosis of squamous or glandular intraepithelial lesions, for excluding microinvasive carcinomas, and for conservative treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Techniques for diagnostic and therapeutic conization are virtually identical. The extent of excision must be adjusted according to individual needs. Conization can be performed with a scalpel (cold-knife conization), laser, or electrosurgical loop. The latter is called the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). Combined conization usually refers to a procedure started with a laser and completed with a cold-knife technique. Laser conization can be excisional or destructive (by vaporization). Each of these approaches has distinct benefits and disadvantages. Cold-knife conization provides the cleanest specimen margins for further histologic study, but it is typically associated with more bleeding than laser or LEEP, and it requires general anesthesia in most cases. Laser procedures are of longer duration and, especially if low-power density is used, may "burn" the margins, thus interfering with histological diagnosis. The main advantage with this procedure is that dots produced by the laser energy can be used to accurately outline the exocervical margins. However, overall, the benefit of using laser for conization may not justify the high cost of the procedure. LEEP procedures have several advantages, including rapidity, preservation of the margins for histological evaluation, and virtual bloodlessness. Moreover, one can perform LEEP procedures in the office or in other outpatient settings.
Anesthesia, General ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia ; Cervix Uteri ; Conization* ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Outpatients