A simple and sensitive liquid chromatographic method was developed for quantification of cefotetan disodium (CTT), a semi-synthetic cephamycin antibiotic, in human plasma. CTT and the internal standard chloramphenicol were extracted from plasma by a simple one-step protein precipitation with 35% (v/v) perchloric acid. Separation was carried out on a reverse-phase C18 column with a mobile phase of acetonitile-water containing 0.5% (v/v) phosphoric acids (20:80, v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The column effluent was monitored by UV detection at 300 nm. The column temperature was maintained at 40°C. This method demonstrated good linearity in the range of 0.525-300.0 μg/mL, with correlation coefficients greater than 0.99. The limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.525 μg/mL in human plasma. Intra- and inter-day precisions were less than 6.63% in terms of relative standard deviation (RSD). The accuracy, when expressed by the bias, ranged from 0.57% to 4.04%. The mean extraction recovery of CTT was higher than 40.94%. The method was found to be precise, accurate, and specific for CTT quantitative analysis, and was successfully applied for a pharmacokinetic study of CTT after a single intravenous dose of 1.0 g of CTT in healthy Chinese subjects.
Cefotetan ; blood ; pharmacokinetics ; Chromatography, Liquid ; methods ; Humans

BACKGROUND: Periodic monitoring of regional or institutional resistance trends of clinically important anaerobic bacteria is recommended, because the resistance of anaerobic pathogens to antimicrobial drugs and inappropriate therapy are associated with poor clinical outcomes. There has been no multicenter study of clinical anaerobic isolates in Korea. We aimed to determine the antimicrobial resistance patterns of clinically important anaerobes at multiple centers in Korea. METHODS: A total of 268 non-duplicated clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria were collected from four large medical centers in Korea in 2012. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by the agar dilution method according to the CLSI guidelines. The following antimicrobials were tested: piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoxitin, cefotetan, imipenem, meropenem, clindamycin, moxifloxacin, chloramphenicol, metronidazole, and tigecycline. RESULTS: Organisms of the Bacteroides fragilis group were highly susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, and meropenem, as their resistance rates to these three antimicrobials were lower than 6%. For B. fragilis group isolates and anaerobic gram-positive cocci, the resistance rates to moxifloxacin were 12-25% and 11-13%, respectively. Among B. fragilis group organisms, the resistance rates to tigecycline were 16-17%. Two isolates of Finegoldia magna were non-susceptible to chloramphenicol (minimum inhibitory concentrations of 16-32 mg/L). Resistance patterns were different among the different hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoxitin, and carbapemems are highly active beta-lactam agents against most of the anaerobes. The resistance rates to moxifloxacin and tigecycline are slightly higher than those in the previous study.
Agar ; Bacteria, Anaerobic* ; Bacteroides fragilis ; Cefotetan ; Cefoxitin ; Chloramphenicol ; Clindamycin ; Gram-Positive Cocci ; Imipenem ; Korea ; Metronidazole ; Piperacillin

7-ACA(7-aminocephalosporanic acid) and ACT(aminocephalosporanic thiazine) are basic materials for development of 2nd and 3rd generation cephalosporin. Occupational asthmas(OA) induced by these materials have been very rarely reported. We had experienced 2 cases of OA by them. One was 26 year-old male laboratorian involving 7ACA manufacturing directly. The other case was 40 year-old male asthmatics working at the ware house keeping 7ACA and ACT, not directly making these. The result of skin prick test with 55 common inhalant allergens and 7ACA, ACT and several cephalosporins including Cefazolin, Cefuroxime, Ceftazidime, Cefotaxime, Ceftriaxone and Cefotetan. First case revealed positive reactions to 7ACA and Ceftriaxone, but second case, only positive to ACT. In first case, bronchial challenge with 7ACA only showed positive, but in second, those with 7ACA and ACT both showed positive, though negative to 7ACA in skin test.
Adult ; Allergens ; Asthma, Occupational* ; Cefazolin ; Cefotaxime ; Cefotetan ; Ceftazidime ; Ceftriaxone ; Cefuroxime ; Cephalosporins ; Humans ; Male ; Skin ; Skin Tests

A 37-year-old male was admitted for a hemorrhoidectomy. He received uneventfully spinal anesthesia for a hemorrhoidectomy. He had no previous history of any allergic tendency. By the request of the general surgeon, a cefotetan was intravenously administered slowly to reduce the incidence of infection. A few minutes later, anaphylactic reaction developed with hypotension, tachycardia, consciousness change and urticaria. After appropriate management, he recovered without any complication.
Adult ; Anaphylaxis* ; Anesthesia, Spinal* ; Cefotetan* ; Consciousness ; Hemorrhoidectomy ; Humans ; Hypotension ; Incidence ; Male ; Tachycardia ; Urticaria

A 37-year-old male was admitted for a hemorrhoidectomy. He received uneventfully spinal anesthesia for a hemorrhoidectomy. He had no previous history of any allergic tendency. By the request of the general surgeon, a cefotetan was intravenously administered slowly to reduce the incidence of infection. A few minutes later, anaphylactic reaction developed with hypotension, tachycardia, consciousness change and urticaria. After appropriate management, he recovered without any complication.
Adult ; Anaphylaxis* ; Anesthesia, Spinal* ; Cefotetan* ; Consciousness ; Hemorrhoidectomy ; Humans ; Hypotension ; Incidence ; Male ; Tachycardia ; Urticaria

PURPOSE: The use of prophylactic antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery is essential. Although postoperative prophylactic antibiotics are recommended within 24 hr, the optimal duration of the use of prophylactic antibiotics after colorectal surgery has not yet been fully proven in Korea. The aim of this study was to compare infectious outcomes in elective colorectal cancer surgery between postoperative 3-day antibiotic therapy and 5-day therapy. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial of a 3-day use vs. a 5-day use of the second-generation cephalosporin cefotetan after elective colorectal surgery. The main outcome measures were the incidences of surgical site infection and all other infectious complications within 21 days after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 306 patients were enrolled. Fifty-one patients were excluded because they received additional surgery or dropped out during the study. Two-hundred fifty-five patients were analyzed in this study. The two groups were similar in terms of demographics, ASA score, tumor location, tumor stage, surgical approach (conventional open vs. laparoscopy-assisted vs. robotic-assisted), and type of operation. The incidences of surgical site infection were not significantly different between the 3-day use group (4/130 or 3.1%) and the 5-day use group (3/125 or 2.4%) (P=1.000). Incidences of overall infectious diseases did not differ significantly between the two groups. Postoperatively, both groups had similar values in their white blood cell count, absolute neutrophil count, and C-reactive protein levels. However, the number of patients is small to draw a definite conclusion in this study. CONCLUSION: Three-day cefotetan administration may be not inferior in preventing surgical site infection compared to 5-day antibiotic administration. However, further studies with a large number of patients are needed before a definite conclusion can be drawn.
Anti-Bacterial Agents ; C-Reactive Protein ; Cefotetan ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; Colorectal Surgery ; Communicable Diseases ; Demography ; Humans ; Incidence ; Korea ; Leukocyte Count ; Neutrophils ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Prospective Studies

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was aimed to disclose main affected organisms in patients with perforated appendicitis and to analyze correlations between culture-sensitivity test and infectious complication. METHODS: In 26 of 421 patients who had undergone appendectomy due to acute appendicitis from April 1996 to March 1999, we performed culture-sensitivity test. The clinical records of these patients were collected and reviewed about clinicopathological features and results of culture-sensitivity test, retrospectively. Culture material was collected in BBL transport media with cotton swab and cultured by MacConkey agar plate. The method of MIC by VITEK was used for sensitivity test. RESULTS: Cultured organisms were E. coli (18 cases), Pseudomonas (4), Enterobacter (2), Enterococcus (1), and Proteus (1). In sensitivity test, sensitive antibiotics against all cultured organism were amikacin, ceftriaxone, imipenem and cefotetan. But ampicillin, sulfametoxazole/trimethoprim and piperacillin were mostly resistant. Infectious complications occurred in 11 of 26 patients (42.3%) and consisted of 9 wound infection and 2 intraabdominal abscess. Especially, 13 of 18 cases in which E. coli were isolated, were resistant to ampicillin. And they had infectious complications statistically more than those who were not resistant to ampicillin (p=0.036). CONCLUSIONS: E. coli was a main organism in perforated appendicitis. In case of ampicillin-resistant E. coli, the patients were susceptible to infectious complication such as wound infection and intraabdominal abscess.
Abscess ; Agar ; Amikacin ; Ampicillin ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Appendectomy ; Appendicitis* ; Cefotetan ; Ceftriaxone ; Enterobacter ; Enterococcus ; Humans ; Imipenem ; Piperacillin ; Proteus ; Pseudomonas ; Retrospective Studies ; Wound Infection

One hundred and eighteen strains of Escherichia coli isolated from clinical specimens were epidemiologically analyzed for antimicrobial resistance, EcoRI restriction endonuclease analysis, southern hybridization with TEM and SHV probe of conjugative R plasmids. 1. Sixty-two to 73% of E. coli isolates were resistant to ampicillin, carbenicillin, sulfisomidine, and tetracycline, and 20-27% to kanamycin, gentamicin, tobramycin, and nalidixic acid. However more than 93% were susceptible to cephalosporins and all strains were highly susceptible to cefotetan, imipenem, aztreonam, and amikacin. 2. Twelve strains were susceptible to all drugs tested and the multiple resistant strains showed 65 resistance pattern types. 3. Thirty-six resistant strains(34%) transferred R plasmids to E. coli RG488 or RG176 by mixed culture. Fifty-six plasmids with 31 different resistant phenotype were obtained from them. 4. Some of 15 plasmids derived from 10 strains showed identical or similar EcoRI restriction endonuclease digestion patterns, hybridized fragment patterns with TEM probe by southern hybridization, and resistance levels of j3-lactams and aminoglycosides. These results indicate that the epidemic strains or plasmids were present in this hospital and molecular genetic analysis of R plasmids can be used to discriminate clinical isolates of multi- resistant E. coli.
Amikacin ; Aminoglycosides ; Ampicillin ; Aztreonam ; Carbenicillin ; Cefotetan ; Cephalosporins ; Digestion ; DNA Restriction Enzymes ; Escherichia coli* ; Escherichia* ; Gentamicins ; Imipenem ; Kanamycin ; Molecular Biology ; Nalidixic Acid ; Phenotype ; Plasmids ; R Factors ; Sulfisomidine ; Tetracycline ; Tobramycin

Cefotetan is a commonly prescribed second-generation cephalosporin that acts against a wide range of bacteria. However, cefotetan-induced hypersensitivity has rarely been reported. We report 2 cases of cefotetan-induced anaphylaxis with immunologic evaluation. The first case was a 70-year-old asthmatic woman who had dyspnea and hypotension during administration of cefotetan, in which high serum-specific IgE to cefotetan-human serum albumin (HSA) conjugate was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The second case was a 63-year-old asthmatic woman who complained of chest tightness and dyspnea during cefotetan infusion, in which high serum-specific IgG1 and IgG4 with no serum specific IgE to cefotetan-HSA conjugate was detected. The basophil activation test using basophils from the patient showed a significant up-regulation of CD63 with the addition of anti-IgG4 antibody compared with that in non-atopic healthy controls. In conclusion, cefotetan can induce anaphylaxis, which may involve both IgE- and IgG4-mediated responses in the pathogenic mechanism.
Aged ; Anaphylaxis* ; Bacteria ; Basophils ; Cefotetan ; Dyspnea ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Female ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Hypotension ; Immunoglobulin E ; Immunoglobulin G ; Middle Aged ; Serum Albumin ; Thorax ; Up-Regulation

To date, only one case of peritonitis with exit site infection in peritoneal dialysis caused by this micro- organism has been reported. In spite of its apparently benign clinical course, which distinguished it from peritonitis caused by Pseudomonas, this peritonitis relapsed and Comamonas could not be eliminated from the peritoneal liquid, probably due to the persistence of the micro-organism in the exit site. Consequently, peritoneal catheter was removed. In this case, a 68-year-old man was admitted with fever, abdominal tenderness and cloudy peritoneal effluent and empirically treated with antibiotics(cefazolin, tobramycin), intraperitoneally(IP) for 7 days. The first culture was positive for Comamonas acidovorans, sensitive to ceftazidime, cefotetan, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxaxin and imipenem and the perotoneal effluent remained cloudy after 7 days. He was treated with ceftazidime IP, oral ciprofloxacin and nystatin for 26 days. 4 days after the antibiotics treatment, the patient was asymptomatic and the cell count of peritoneal effluent was 50 WBC/mm3 with negative culture. 25 days after the treatment, the patient remained asymptomatic and with 5 WBC/mm3 in peritoneal effluent. Consequently, We experienced a case of peritonitis due to Comamonas acidovorans in a patient on CAPD without exit site infection and managed with preservation of the catheter.
Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Catheters* ; Cefotetan ; Ceftazidime ; Ceftriaxone ; Cell Count ; Ciprofloxacin ; Comamonas* ; Delftia acidovorans* ; Fever ; Humans ; Imipenem ; Nystatin ; Peritoneal Dialysis ; Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory* ; Peritonitis* ; Pseudomonas