1.Separation of the Tip of a Coblation Wand within the Knee Joint: A Complication of Arthroscopic Adhesiolysis.
Yeub KIM ; Ha Kyung KIM ; Jung Ro YOON ; Nasir MUZAFFAR ; Taik Sun KIM ; Young Su SHIN
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2010;2(2):125-127
Coblation devices are now widely used in arthroscopic surgery and they show a very low incidence of intraoperative complications. We experienced a case where the tip of the wand separated and migrated into the posterior knee compartment in an arthrofibrotic knee. The free wand tip was identified and then extricated from the popliteal hiatus of the knee with using C-arm fluoroscopic control. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of its kind involving coblation wands. We describe this complication to show that the use of coblation devices can lead to unexpected problems and it is imperative to inspect all instruments before and after each surgical use.
Arthroscopy/adverse effects/*instrumentation
;
Catheter Ablation/adverse effects/*instrumentation
;
*Equipment Failure
;
Humans
;
*Intraoperative Complications
;
Knee Joint/*surgery
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
2.Radiofrequency Ablation Using a Monopolar Wet Electrode for the Treatment of Inoperable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Preliminary Report.
Gong Yong JIN ; Young Min HAN ; Young Sun LEE ; Yong Chul LEE
Korean Journal of Radiology 2008;9(2):140-147
OBJECTIVE: To assess the technical feasibility and complications of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using a monopolar wet electrode for the treatment of inoperable non-small cell lung malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with a non-small cell lung malignancy underwent RFA under CT guidance. All the patients were non-surgical candidates, with mean maximum tumor diameters ranging from 3 to 6 cm (mean: 4.6 +/- 1.1 cm). A single 16-gauge open-perfused electrode with a 2 cm exposed tip was used for the procedure. A 0.9% NaCl saline solution was used as the perfusion liquid with the flow adjusted to 30 mL/h. The radiofrequency energy was applied for 10-40 minutes. The response to RFA was evaluated by performing contrast-enhanced CT immediately after RFA, one month after treatment and then every three months thereafter. RESULTS: Technical failure was observed in six (37.5%) of 16 patients: intractable pain (n = 2) and non-stop coughing (n = 4). The mean follow-up interval was 15 +/- 8 months (range: 9-31 months). The mean maximum ablated diameter in the technically successful group of patients ranged from 3.5 to 7.5 cm (mean 5.1 +/- 1.3 cm). Complete necrosis was attained for eight (80%) of 10 lesions, and partial necrosis was achieved for two lesions. There were two major complications (2/10, 20%) encountered: a hemothorax (n = 1) and a bronchopleural fistula (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Although RFA using a monopolar wet electrode can create a large ablation zone, it is associated with a high rate of technical failure when used to treat inoperable non-small cell lung malignancies.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/radiography/*surgery
;
Catheter Ablation/adverse effects/*instrumentation
;
Feasibility Studies
;
Humans
;
Lung/pathology
;
Lung Neoplasms/radiography/*surgery
;
Middle Aged
;
Necrosis
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed