Examining the eye with high resolution ultrasonography, authors encountered 34 cases(41 eyeballs) of cataractand found out its characteristic ultrasonographic findings, though cataract is easily recognized by physician oninspection. Ultrasonographic findings of cataract were as follows; 1. Thickening of lens due to edema. 2.Demonstration of lens echo in whole circumference. 3. Multiple internal lens echo.
Cataract ; Edema ; Ultrasonography

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with conventional cataract surgery on effective phacoemulsification time (EPT). METHODS: This study included 66 patients 100 eyes who underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and 68 patients 100 eyes who underwent conventional cataract surgery. Both groups underwent phacoemulsification using pulsed ultrasound energy and EPT was evaluated. The groups were further analyzed according to preoperative Lens opacities classification system (LOCS) III grading. Patients who had femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery underwent lens fragmentation with quadrant, hybrid, or grid pattern and the EPT was respectively evaluated. RESULTS: The mean EPT was 5.85 +/- 4.31 seconds in the femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery group and 10.34 +/- 6.61 seconds in the conventional group. Overall, EPT was statistically significantly lower in the femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery group compared to the conventional group. When the groups were analyzed according to LOCS III grading, this result was consistent for all cataract grades and the reduction in EPT was increased with the higher LOCS III grade. When the groups were analyzed according to lens fragmentation patterns, the mean EPT was lower with 350 microm grid pattern than the quadrant or hybrid pattern. CONCLUSIONS: The femtosecond laser-assisted system in cataract surgery can be an efficient cataract surgery using lower EPT compared to the conventional procedure. Additionally, significant differences were observed in the mean EPT of cataract surgery using the femtosecond laser-assisted system among the 3 lens fragmentation pattern groups.
Cataract* ; Classification ; Humans ; Phacoemulsification* ; Ultrasonography

PURPOSE: To compare the phacoemulsification time used in an adjunctive oscillation device and a conventional ultrasound phacomachine. METHODS: Thirty eyes had phacoemulsification with a NeoSoniX(R) (Alcon Infiniti phacoemulsification system, Alcon, TX, U.S.A.) tip, and 30 eyes had phacoemulsification with a conventional ultrasound tip. Using the Scheimpflug camera (EAS-1000, Nidek, Japan), densities of the lens were measured in the eye of each patient in both groups preoperatively. The setting of parameters for phacoemulsification in both groups was identical. The power was 19% and the vacuum setting was 180 mmHg. A pulse rate of 40 pulses per second was used. For the cataract surgery with NeoSoniX(R), the setting of the oscillation angle was fixed to 100% (4 degrees). After cataract extraction, the phacoemulsification time was recorded. RESULTS: The mean phacoemulsification time was 28.50+/-12.40 seconds in the NeoSoniX(R) group and 49.87+/-45.55 seconds in the conventional group. The reduced phacoemulsification time was statistically significant (p<0.05) in the NeoSoniX(R) group. CONCLUSIONS: There was a statistically significant difference of phacoemulsification time between the NeoSoniX(R) and conventional phacoemulsification groups. Therefore, NeoSoniX(R) may contribute to a reduction in phacoemulsification time in all applications and can be an effective adjunctive device in a conventional phacomachine.
Cataract ; Cataract Extraction ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Phacoemulsification* ; Ultrasonography ; Vacuum

We measured the lens thickness and anterior chamber depth on 214 eyes (162 cataract eyes, 52 normal control eyes) using the EAS-1000 Scheimpflug camera. And the results was compared with measurement of A-scan ultrasonography in 49 cataract eyes. The thickness of cataract lens, especially in anterior subcapsular opacities in over 61 years old was significantly thin rather than control lens (p0.05). Lens thickness was increased with age by an annual rate of 0.0l5mm in monnal eyes (pcataract and there is differences between the measurement of Scheimpflug camera and that of A-scan ultrasonography.
Anterior Chamber ; Cataract* ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Ultrasonography

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy and the influencing factors of partial coherence interferometry in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for cataract surgery. METHODS: In 86 eyes of 69 patients who had undergone cataract surgery, we measured axial length using both IOLMaster and contact type ultrasonography, calculated the target refraction with SRK II formula and compared the result with the measured value after operation. We also evaluated the factors influencing the accuracy of the power calculation such as age, sex, type of cataract, severity of nucleosclerosis, corneal power, and preoperative refraction. RESULTS: In IOLMaster and contact type ultrasonography, the mean axial lengths were 23.70 +/- 1.27 mm and 23.55 +/- 1.28 mm (p<0.01), and the mean absolute errors (MAE) of refraction were 0.53 +/- 0.26D and 0.66 +/- 0.39D (p<0.01) respectively. The eyes of longer axial length showed larger MAE than those of shorter axial length (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Partial coherence interferometry was more accurate than contact type ultrasonography in IOL power calculation. The factor associated with the accuracy of partial coherence interferometry was the axial length.
Cataract ; Humans ; Interferometry* ; Lenses, Intraocular* ; Ultrasonography

PURPOSE: To evaluation the accuracy of the IOL power calculation formulae measured by IOL Master(R) and applanation ultrasonography for the Tecnis ZCB00 IOL. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 170 eyes in 121 patients who underwent cataract surgery in our hospital with AMO Tecnis ZCB00 IOL.s. The SRK/T formula was used to predict the patient's implanted IOL power. Differences in the predicted refractive errors between IOL Master(R) and ultrasonography were analyzed and factors attributed to the differences were also analyzed. Three months after cataract surgery, mean numeric error and mean absolute error were analyzed. RESULTS: SRK/II and SRK/T formulas calculated using ultrasonography showed differences compared to the same formulas calculated using IOL Master(R), in which hyperopic shift was also demonstrated. No definite factor was attributed to the differences between the 2 methods. Although the 3 formulas of IOL Master(R) showed no significant difference in refractive errors, the SRK/T formula calculated using IOL Master(R) showed the least mean absolute and numeric errors. CONCLUSIONS: IOL Master(R) is considered more suitable when determining proper AMO Tecnis ZCB00 IOL power in cataract surgery. The hyperopic shift should be considered when calculating the IOL power using only ultrasonography.
Cataract ; Ultrasonography* ; Humans ; Lenses, Intraocular* ; Refractive Errors ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonography

To determine the actual axial length of the pseudophakic eye, we mea-sured the axial length using ultrasound before and after cataract surgery in 157 eyes of 97 patient.The measured axial length of the pseudophakic eye with silicone or acrylic intraocular lens was longer than the axial length measured before operation.There was linear correlation between axial length measured before and after operation in cases of PMMA, silicone, or acrylic intraocular lens.The axial length corrected with ultrasonic velocity and central thickness of the intraocular lens was approximate to the mea-sure before operaion.So, we concluded that axial length is not actually elongated after operation and the exact axial length may be obtained by correcting the measured axial length of the pseudophakic eye using ultra-sonic velocity and central thickness of the intraocular lens.
Cataract ; Lenses, Intraocular ; Polymethyl Methacrylate ; Silicones ; Ultrasonics ; Ultrasonography

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes during phacoemulsification when using active fluidics (Centurion®) and gravity-based fluidics (Infiniti®) in immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery. METHODS: From January 2015 to September 2015, 68 eyes of 34 patients with bilateral cataract were assigned to receive immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery by Centurion® in one eye and Infiniti® in the other eye. We measured and compared intraoperative factors, including cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), ultrasound time, mean amount of balanced salt solution (BSS) used, and pain using a scale. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell density (ECD) were also evaluated preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: Intraoperative measurements showed significantly less CDE (5.05 ± 2.18 vs. 7.05 ± 3.82), ultrasound time (24.65 ± 9.68 vs. 34.95 ± 17.95 seconds), and mean amount of BSS used (37.06 ± 10.25 vs. 44.88 ± 16.38 mL) in the Centurion® group than in the Infiniti® group (p = 0.011, p = 0.005, p = 0.021, respectively). The intraoperative pain scale was 0.26 ± 0.51 in the Centurion® group and 0.50 ± 0.71 in the Infiniti® group, and was not significantly different (p = 0.121). BCVA, increase of CCT and decrease of ECD were not significantly different between the two groups at 1 month postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of phacoemulsification in the Centurion® group was superior to that in the Infiniti® group. The level of intraoperative pain and clinical outcomes 1 month after surgery were not significantly different between the two groups.
Cataract* ; Endothelial Cells ; Humans ; Phacoemulsification* ; Ultrasonography ; Visual Acuity

PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy of the Haigis formula compared to other formulas using contact ultrasound biometry. METHODS: This study was performed on 94 patients (114 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery in our hospital. Axial length (AXL) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were measured using both A-scan and intraocular lens (IOL) Master(R). Patients were divided into three groups based on AXL; Group I (AXL < 22.5 mm), Group II (22.5 mm < or = AXL < 25.5 mm), and Group III (AXL > or = 25.5 mm). Before cataract surgery, predicted refraction was calculated using the Haigis, SRK/T, Hoffer Q, and Holladay 1 formulas using both A-scan and IOL Master(R) measurements. Mean absolute error (MAE) were analyzed at one month after surgery using the various IOL formulas. RESULTS: Using contact ultrasound biometry, in Group I, MAE of Haigis was 0.80 +/- 0.67 D and was significantly lower than that using SRK/T. In Group II, the Haigis MAE was 0.72 +/- 0.55 D and was significantly lower than the results of all other formulas. In Group III, the Haigis MAE was 0.76 +/- 1.13 D and not significantly different from the results of other formulas. Comparing MAE of A-scan to IOL Master(R), the Haigis formula showed 0.16 D higher error that decreased when the AXL was close to the normal range. CONCLUSIONS: Using contact ultrasound biometry, the Haigis formula provided the best predictability of postoperative refractive outcome compared to other formulas in eyes with normal axial length.
Anterior Chamber ; Biometry* ; Cataract ; Humans ; Lenses, Intraocular ; Reference Values ; Ultrasonography*

PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy of the Haigis formula compared to other formulas using contact ultrasound biometry. METHODS: This study was performed on 94 patients (114 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery in our hospital. Axial length (AXL) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were measured using both A-scan and intraocular lens (IOL) Master(R). Patients were divided into three groups based on AXL; Group I (AXL < 22.5 mm), Group II (22.5 mm < or = AXL < 25.5 mm), and Group III (AXL > or = 25.5 mm). Before cataract surgery, predicted refraction was calculated using the Haigis, SRK/T, Hoffer Q, and Holladay 1 formulas using both A-scan and IOL Master(R) measurements. Mean absolute error (MAE) were analyzed at one month after surgery using the various IOL formulas. RESULTS: Using contact ultrasound biometry, in Group I, MAE of Haigis was 0.80 +/- 0.67 D and was significantly lower than that using SRK/T. In Group II, the Haigis MAE was 0.72 +/- 0.55 D and was significantly lower than the results of all other formulas. In Group III, the Haigis MAE was 0.76 +/- 1.13 D and not significantly different from the results of other formulas. Comparing MAE of A-scan to IOL Master(R), the Haigis formula showed 0.16 D higher error that decreased when the AXL was close to the normal range. CONCLUSIONS: Using contact ultrasound biometry, the Haigis formula provided the best predictability of postoperative refractive outcome compared to other formulas in eyes with normal axial length.
Anterior Chamber ; Biometry* ; Cataract ; Humans ; Lenses, Intraocular ; Reference Values ; Ultrasonography*