No abstract available.
Carotid Arteries ; Carotid Stenosis

A retrospective study on the 77 patients suspected the cerebral vascular lesions received the ultrasound Doppler and angiography to evaluated the stenosid of carotid of which 154 rounds of ultrasound and angiography for outer, inner and bifurcation of carotid. The results have shown that there was suitability between ultrasound and angiography in 100% cases of complete stenosid or nearly embolised stenosid. The false positive results of ultrasound occurred in 9 rounds for inner carotid stenosid, 4 rounds for outer carotid stenosid and 2 rounds for bifurcation of carotid. The false negative results occurred in the inner carotid, outer carotid and bifurcation of carotid was 5, 2 and 12 rounds.
Carotid Stenosis ; Ultrasonography ; Angiography

No abstract available.
Angioplasty* ; Carotid Artery, Internal* ; Carotid Stenosis*

Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) for carotid stenosis has been increasingly used as an alternative treatment in patients not eligible for surgery. Even though CAS can be performed relatively simply in many cases, various complications can occur. We report four cases of CAS using the Carotid Wallstent, which were complicated by delayed shortening of the stent, resulting in restenosis after successful CAS.
Angioplasty ; Carotid Arteries ; Carotid Stenosis ; Humans ; Stents

No abstract available.
Carotid Stenosis ; Endarterectomy, Carotid ; Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain

Carotid Stenosis ; surgery ; Endarterectomy, Carotid ; Humans

Carotid Stenosis ; surgery ; Endarterectomy, Carotid ; Humans ; Stents

OBJECTIVE: There are two established surgical treatment options for carotid artery stenosis. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been accepted as a gold standard for surgical treatment while carotid artery stenting (CAS) has recently become an alternative option. Each treatment option has advantages and disadvantages for the treatment outcomes. We propose a protocol for selection of a proper surgical treatment option for carotid artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 192 published articles on management of carotid artery stenosis were reviewed. Preoperatively considerable factors which had been repeatedly noted in those articles for the risk/benefits of CEA or CAS were selected. According to those factors, a protocol with four categories was established. RESULTS: CEA or CAS is indicated when the patient has a symptomatic stenosis > or = 50%, or when the patient has an asymptomatic stenosis > or = 80%. Each treatment option has absolute indications and favorable indications. Each absolute indication is scored with three points, and each favorable indication, one point. Based on the highest scores, a proper treatment option (CEA or CAS) is selected. CONCLUSION: We have been treating patients according to this protocol and evaluating the outcomes of our protocol-based decision because this protocol might be helpful in assessment of risk/benefit for selection of a proper surgical treatment option in patients with carotid artery stenosis.
Carotid Arteries ; Carotid Stenosis* ; Constriction, Pathologic ; Endarterectomy, Carotid ; Humans ; Stents

Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is increasingly recognized as an uncommon, but serious, complication subsequent to carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The onset of CHS generally occurs within two weeks of CEA and CAS, and a delay in the onset of CHS of over one week after CAS is quite rare. We describe a patient who developed CHS three weeks after CAS with status epilepticus.
Carotid Arteries* ; Carotid Stenosis ; Endarterectomy, Carotid ; Humans ; Status Epilepticus* ; Stents*

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is insufficient evidence regarding the optimal treatment for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.METHODS: Bayesian cross-design and network meta-analyses were performed to compare the safety and efficacy among carotid artery stenting (CAS), carotid endarterectomy (CEA), and medical treatment (MT). We identified 18 studies (4 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 14 nonrandomized, comparative studies [NRCSs]) comparing CAS with CEA, and 4 RCTs comparing CEA with MT from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases.RESULTS: The risk for periprocedural stroke tended to increase in CAS, compared to CEA (odds ratio [OR], 1.86; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.62–4.54). However, estimates for periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) were quite heterogeneous in RCTs and NRCSs. Despite a trend of decreased risk with CAS in RCTs (OR, 0.70; 95% CrI, 0.27–1.24), the risk was similar in NRCSs (OR, 1.02; 95% CrI, 0.87–1.18). In indirect comparisons of MT and CAS, MT showed a tendency to have a higher risk for the composite of periprocedural death, stroke, MI, or nonperiprocedural ipsilateral stroke (OR, 1.30; 95% CrI, 0.74–2.73). Analyses of study characteristics showed that CEA-versus-MT studies took place about 10-year earlier than CEA-versus-CAS studies.CONCLUSIONS: A similar risk for periprocedural MI between CEA and CAS in NRCSs suggested that concerns about periprocedural MI accompanied by CEA might not matter in real-world practice when preoperative evaluation and management are working. Maybe the benefits of CAS over MT have been overestimated considering advances in medical therapy within10-year gap between CEA-versus-MT and CEA-versus-CAS studies.
Carotid Arteries ; Carotid Stenosis ; Endarterectomy, Carotid ; Myocardial Infarction ; Stents ; Stroke