1.Toxicity of crude and detoxified Tityus serrulatus venom in anti-venom-producing sheep.
Marina G FERREIRA ; Clara G DUARTE ; Maira S OLIVEIRA ; Karen L P CASTRO ; Maílson S TEIXEIRA ; Lílian P G REIS ; José A ZAMBRANO ; Evanguedes KALAPOTHAKIS ; Ana Flávia R M MICHEL ; Benito SOTO-BLANCO ; Carlos CHÁVEZ-OLÓRTEGUI ; Marília M MELO
Journal of Veterinary Science 2016;17(4):467-477
Specific anti-venom used to treat scorpion envenomation is usually obtained from horses after hyperimmunization with crude scorpion venom. However, immunized animals often become ill because of the toxic effects of the immunogens used. This study was conducted to evaluate the toxic and immunogenic activities of crude and detoxified Tityus serrulatus (Ts) venom in sheep during the production of anti-scorpionic anti-venom. Sheep were categorized into three groups: G1, control, immunized with buffer only; G2, immunized with crude Ts venom; and G3, immunized with glutaraldehyde-detoxified Ts venom. All animals were subjected to clinical exams and supplementary tests. G2 sheep showed mild clinical changes, but the other groups tolerated the immunization program well. Specific antibodies generated in animals immunized with either Ts crude venom or glutaraldehyde-detoxified Ts venom recognized the crude Ts venom in both assays. To evaluate the lethality neutralization potential of the produced sera, individual serum samples were pre-incubated with Ts crude venom, then subcutaneously injected into mice. Efficient immune protection of 56.3% and 43.8% against Ts crude venom was observed in G2 and G3, respectively. Overall, the results of this study support the use of sheep and glutaraldehyde-detoxified Ts venom for alternative production of specific anti-venom.
Animals
;
Antibodies
;
Horses
;
Immunization Programs
;
Mice
;
Scorpion Venoms
;
Scorpions
;
Sheep*
;
Venoms*
2.Medicinal properties of Angelica archangelica root extract: Cytotoxicity in breast cancer cells and its protective effects against in vivo tumor development.
Carlos R OLIVEIRA ; Daniel G SPINDOLA ; Daniel M GARCIA ; Adolfo ERUSTES ; Alexandre BECHARA ; Caroline PALMEIRA-DOS-SANTOS ; Soraya S SMAILI ; Gustavo J S PEREIRA ; André HINSBERGER ; Ezequiel P VIRIATO ; Maria CRISTINA MARCUCCI ; Alexandra C H F SAWAYA ; Samantha L TOMAZ ; Elaine G RODRIGUES ; Claudia BINCOLETTO
Journal of Integrative Medicine 2019;17(2):132-140
OBJECTIVE:
Although Angelica archangelica is a medicinal and aromatic plant with a long history of use for both medicinal and food purposes, there are no studies regarding the antineoplastic activity of its root. This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity and antitumor effects of the crude extract of A. archangelica root (CEAA) on breast cancer.
METHODS:
The cytotoxicity of CEAA against breast adenocarcinoma cells (4T1 and MCF-7) was evaluated by a 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Morphological and biochemical changes were detected by Hoechst 33342/propidium iodide (PI) and annexin V/PI staining. Cytosolic calcium mobilization was evaluated in cells staining with FURA-4NW. Immunoblotting was used to determine the effect of CEAA on anti- and pro-apoptotic proteins (Bcl-2 and Bax, respectively). The 4T1 cell-challenged mice were used for in vivo assay.
RESULTS:
Using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis, angelicin, a constituent of the roots and leaves of A. archangelica, was found to be the major constituent of the CEAA evaluated in this study (73 µg/mL). The CEAA was cytotoxic for both breast cancer cell lines studied but not for human fibroblasts. Treatment of 4T1 cells with the CEAA increased Bax protein levels accompanied by decreased Bcl-2 expression, in the presence of cleaved caspase-3 and cytosolic calcium mobilization, suggesting mitochondrial involvement in breast cancer cell death induced by the CEAA in this cell line. No changes on the Bcl-2/Bax ratio were observed in CEAA-treated MCF7 cells. Gavage administration of the CEAA (500 mg/kg) to 4T1 cell-challenged mice significantly decreased tumor growth when compared with untreated animals.
CONCLUSION
Altogether, our data show the antitumor potential of the CEAA against breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Further research is necessary to better elucidate the pharmacological application of the CEAA in breast cancer therapy.