OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI) model in identifying retinal lesions, validated its performance on a Filipino population dataset, and evaluated the impact of dataset diversity on AI analysis accuracy.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, analytical, institutional study analyzed standardized macula-centered fundus photos taken with the Zeiss Visucam®. The AI model’s output was compared with manual readings by trained retina specialists.

RESULTS

A total of 215 eyes from 109 patients were included in the study. Human graders identified 109 eyes (50.7%) with retinal abnormalities. The AI model demonstrated an overall accuracy of 73.0% (95% CI 66.6% – 78.8%) in detecting abnormal retinas, with a sensitivity of 54.1% (95% CI 44.3% – 63.7%) and specificity of 92.5% (95% CI 85.7% – 96.7%).

CONCLUSION

The availability and sources of AI training datasets can introduce biases into AI algorithms. In our dataset, racial differences in retinal morphology, such as differences in retinal pigmentation, affected the accuracy of AI image-based analysis. More diverse datasets and external validation on different populations are needed to mitigate these biases.

Human ; Artificial Intelligence ; Deep Learning