: Vulvar Rhabdomyosarcoma (VR) is a rare gynecological cancer primarily found in children. This case report discusses the diagnosis, treatment, and management complexities of a 19-year-old patient with a slow-growing vulvar lesion. : A 19-year-old female with obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease presented with a left vulvar lesion measuring 11 x 7 x 7 cm that was noticed five months ago. Core needle biopsy of the lesion revealed findings consistent with rhabdomyosarcoma. A Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) scan showed a hypermetabolic 8.3 x 6.7 x 6.7 cm mass in the left vulvar area, extending to the vagina, rectal wall, and anal region along with enlarged left inguinal lymph nodes. : The patient was treated with the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-IV (IRS-IV) protocol for 16 weeks with vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy was administered between weeks 9-14, followed by continuation chemotherapy until week 28. Interim PET-CT scan prior to concurrent chemoradiotherapy revealed a reduced mass size to 3.8 x 2.8 cm and resolved left inguinal lymphadenopathy. : Despite completing treatment, the patient reported persistent back pain and mobility issues three weeks later. A subsequent PET-CT scan showed hypermetabolic lesions at vertebral locations C6, T9, T12, and L1-L3, along with the left ischium and bilateral femoral shafts. Thoracic vertebrae biopsy confirmed rhabdomyoblasts. Patient underwent palliative radiotherapy and spinal stabilization then proceeded with second line therapy with 1 cycle of GemcitabineDocetaxel but showed progression of symptoms described as persistent bleeding (hematuria) and neutropenia. Further diagnostics done to the patient showed possible bone marrow involvement. Unfortunately, the patient expired owing to symptoms of cancer progression. The management of adult-onset VR presents a significant therapeutic challenge, largely attributable to the scarcity of clinical trials and tailored treatment regimens for this specific age group. Outcomes documented in existing literature for adult VR cases present with recurrence, disease progression, and mortality. The treatment landscape in adults is complicated by comorbidities which may influence both the therapeutic choices and outcomes. Given these intricate challenges, this case echoes the need for research efforts aimed at developing management protocols specifically designed for adults with VR.
rhabdomyosarcoma ; adolescent

Background and Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) has the third highest incidence in the Philippines. Currently, there is a paucity in literature that is focused on the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of Filipinos regarding CRC screening. This is the first study in the Philippines that describes this. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that validated a 52-item Filipino questionnaire on the knowledge on colorectal cancer, willingness to undergo CRC screening, and perceived benefits and barriers to fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and colonoscopy. The study enrolled household heads more than 20 years of age residing in both urban and rural communities in the Philippines. Results: The UP-PGH CRC KAP (University of the Philippines – Philippine General Hospital Colorectal Cancer Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices) and Rawl Questionnaire’s validity and internal consistency were established in a pilot study of 30 respondents. A total of 288 respondents were then enrolled to the main study group with a median age of 54.0. Knowledge scores for prognosis and utility of CRC screening were modest (6.3/12 and 8.4/20, respectively). Perceived benefit scores to FOBT and colonoscopy were high (9.9/12 and 13.9/16, respectively).Median scores to barriers to FOBT and colonoscopy were intermediate (22.5/36 and 35.8/60, respectively). Notably, a vast majority (86.1%) were willing to participate in CRC screening programs initiated by the government, and 46.9% agreed to undergo screening tests even as out-of-pocket expense. Conclusion The UP-PGH CRC KAP Questionnaire as well as the Filipino translation of the Rawl Questionnaire are reliable and valid tools in extensively assessing the knowledge of Filipinos on CRC and willingness to undergo screening, as well as the benefits of and barriers to FOBT and colonoscopy. Knowledge scores were modest suggesting that directed educational campaigns and awareness programs can aid in increasing awareness about CRC and its screening. Household income and highest educational attainment were significantly positively correlated with knowledge scores, and perceived benefits of and barriers to CRC screening. Scores were generally comparable between urban and rural communities.
Knowledge ; Attitudes

Objectives: Adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPG) has been shown to reduce inter-physician practice variation and improve quality of care. This study evaluated guideline adherence of physicians in two tertiary public hospitals to local CPG on COVID-19. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective chart review, rapid assessment method study. Guideline adherence and non-adherence (overuse and underuse) to 15 strong recommendations in the prevailing Philippine COVID-19 Living Recommendations were assessed among a sample of patients admitted in two centers from July to October 2021. Differences in adherence across COVID-19 disease severities and managing hospital units were analyzed. Results: A total of 723 patient charts from two centers were reviewed. Guideline adherence to dexamethasone use among patients with hypoxemia is 91.4% (95% CI 88.6 to 93.6) with 9.2% overuse. Tocilizumab was underused in 52.2% of patients with indications to receive the drug. There was overuse of empiric antibiotics in 43.6% of patients without suspicion of bacterial coinfection. Lowest adherence to antibiotic use was seen among patients with critical disease severity and those managed in the intensive care unit. None of the other non-recommended treatment modalities were given. Conclusion Management of COVID-19 in both centers was generally adherent to guideline recommendations. We detected high underuse of tocilizumab probably related to the global supply shortage during the study period and high overuse of antibiotics in patients without suspicion of bacterial coinfection. While the results of this study cannot be generalized in other healthcare settings, we recommend the application of similar rapid assessment studies in guideline adherence evaluation as a quality improvement tool and to identify issues with resource utilization especially during public health emergencies.
Guideline Adherence ; COVID-19 ; Quality Improvement

Objectives: Adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPG) has been shown to reduce inter-physician practice variation and improve quality of care. This study evaluated guideline adherence of physicians in two tertiary public hospitals to local CPG on COVID-19. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective chart review, rapid assessment method study. Guideline adherence and non-adherence (overuse and underuse) to 15 strong recommendations in the prevailing Philippine COVID-19 Living Recommendations were assessed among a sample of patients admitted in two centers from July to October 2021. Differences in adherence across COVID-19 disease severities and managing hospital units were analyzed. Results: A total of 723 patient charts from two centers were reviewed. Guideline adherence to dexamethasone use among patients with hypoxemia is 91.4% (95% CI 88.6 to 93.6) with 9.2% overuse. Tocilizumab was underused in 52.2% of patients with indications to receive the drug. There was overuse of empiric antibiotics in 43.6% of patients without suspicion of bacterial coinfection. Lowest adherence to antibiotic use was seen among patients with critical disease severity and those managed in the intensive care unit. None of the other non-recommended treatment modalities were given. Conclusion Management of COVID-19 in both centers was generally adherent to guideline recommendations. We detected high underuse of tocilizumab probably related to the global supply shortage during the study period and high overuse of antibiotics in patients without suspicion of bacterial coinfection. While the results of this study cannot be generalized in other healthcare settings, we recommend the application of similar rapid assessment studies in guideline adherence evaluation as a quality improvement tool and to identify issues with resource utilization especially during public health emergencies
Guideline Adherence ; COVID-19 ; Quality Improvement