Cardiology Service, Hospital ; organization & administration ; Health Services Administration ; Humanities ; Humans

OBJECTIVE: Especially in emergency departments (EDs), a lack of internal medicine (IM) residents in charge causes difficulties in medical care and ED overcrowding. Thus, protocols without IM residents in EDs is needed. This study aimed to investigate changes in medical care when emergency medicine residents replaced the roles of IM residents. METHODS: This study was conducted at a single-site ED of a university medical center. The study group contained patients admitted to the IM department between September and December 2015, during which IM residents were absent in the ED. The control group contained patients admitted to the IM department between September and December 2014, during which IM residents were present in the ED. Changes in medical care between the presence and absence of IM residents in the ED were studied by comparing admission rates from the ED, length of ED stay, duration of hospitalization, and concordance of diagnoses between admission and discharge by the IM department. RESULTS: The study group contained 2,341 patients; the control group contained 2,215 patients. Admission rates from the ED increased by 53.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], P < 0.001); lengths of stay decreased by 15.1% (95% CI, P < 0.001); and durations of hospitalization in the pulmonology department decreased by 38.4% (95% CI, P=0.001). Concordance of diagnoses between admission and discharge decreased by 14.2% in the cardiology department (95% CI, P=0.021). CONCLUSION: Lengths of stay were reduced without critical declines in diagnostic concordance rates when emergency medicine physicians, instead of IM residents in the ED, decided upon admissions of IM patients.
Academic Medical Centers ; Cardiology ; Diagnosis ; Emergencies* ; Emergency Medicine ; Emergency Service, Hospital* ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Internal Medicine* ; Length of Stay ; Pulmonary Medicine

OBJECTIVE: To explore the application and the effect of early recognition of deteriorating patient program in department of cardiac surgery. METHODS: We used the early recognition of deteriorating patient program in the cardiac surgery groups, including cardiac surgeons, nurses in ward, ICU and operation rooms of the cardiac surgery department, and compared the satisfaction of nurses and doctors, handover time, handover score of critical patients, and rate of unplanned ICU admission before and after the intervention. RESULTS: After using the early recognition of deteriorating patient program, the satisfaction of doctors and nurses was increased, the handover time was lowered 0.56 min/time (t=2.22, P<0.05), the handover score of critical patients enhanced by 19.59 points (t=30.57, P<0.001), the rate of unplanned ICU readmission after the operation reduced by 4.8% (χ2=4.14, P<0.05). CONCLUSION Early recognition of deteriorating patient program can improve the safety of cardiac patients, enhance the self-confidence of nurses and work efficiency.
Cardiology Service, Hospital ; organization & administration ; Critical Illness ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care ; Patient Handoff ; Surgery Department, Hospital ; organization & administration

Biomedical Research ; history ; trends ; Cardiology ; education ; history ; trends ; Cardiology Service, Hospital ; history ; Coronary Care Units ; history ; Coronary Disease ; diagnosis ; therapy ; Education, Medical, Graduate ; history ; trends ; Forecasting ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Humans ; Singapore

INTRODUCTION: Patients referred for chest pain from primary care have increased, along with demand for outpatient cardiology consultations. We evaluated 'Triage Protocol' that implements standardised diagnostic testing prior to patients' first cardiology consultation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under the 'Triage Protocol', patients referred for chest pain were pretriaged using a standardised algorithm and subsequently referred for relevant functional diagnostic cardiology tests before their initial cardiology consultation. At the initial cardiology consultation scheduled by the primary care provider, test results were reviewed. A total of 522 triage patients (mean age 55 ± 13, male 53%) were frequency-matched by age, gender and risk cohort to 289 control patients (mean age: 56 ± 11, male: 52%). Pretest risk of coronary artery disease was defined according to a Modified Duke Clinical Score (MDCS) as low (<10), intermediate (10-20) and high (>20). The primary outcome was time from referral to diagnosis (days). Secondary outcomes were total visits, discharge rate at first consultation, patient cost and adverse cardiac outcomes. RESULTS: The 'Triage Protocol' resulted in shorter times from referral to diagnosis (46 vs 131 days; <0.0001) and fewer total visits (2.4 vs 3.0; <0.0001). However, triage patients in low-risk groups experienced higher costs due to increased testing (S$421 vs S$357, = 0.003). Adverse cardiac event rates under the 'Triage Protocol' indicated no compromise to patient safety (triage vs control: 0.57% vs 0.35%; = 1.000). CONCLUSION By implementing diagnostic cardiac testing prior to patients' first specialist consultation, the 'Triage Protocol' expedited diagnosis and reduced subsequent visits across all risk groups in ambulatory chest pain patients.
Algorithms ; Cardiology Service, Hospital ; Chest Pain ; therapy ; Clinical Protocols ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Primary Health Care ; Treatment Outcome ; Triage ; methods

OBJECTIVE: Bedside consultation by cardiologists may facilitate safe discharge of selected patients from the emergency department (ED) even when admission is recommended by the History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk factors, Troponin (HEART) pathway. If bedside evaluation is unavailable, phone consultation between emergency physicians and cardiologists would be most impactful if the resultant disposition is discordant with the HEART pathway. We therefore evaluate discordance between actual disposition and that suggested by the HEART pathway in patients presenting to the ED with chest pain for whom cardiology consultation occurred exclusively by phone and to assess the impact of phone-consultation on disposition.METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective study of adults presenting to the ED with chest pain whose emergency physician had a phone consultation with a cardiologist. Actual disposition was abstracted from the medical record. HEART pathway category (low-risk, discharge; high-risk, admit) was derived from ED documentation. For discharged patients, major adverse cardiac events were assessed at 30 days by chart review and phone follow-up.RESULTS: For the 170 patients that had cardiologist phone consultation, discordance between actual disposition and the HEART pathway was 17%. The HEART pathway recommended admission for nearly 80% of discharged patients. Following cardiologist phone-consultation, 10% of high-risk patients were discharged, with the majority having undergone a functional study recommended by the cardiologist. At 30 days, discharged patients had experienced no episodes of major adverse cardiac events or rehospitalization for cardiac reasons.CONCLUSION: For patients presenting to the ED with chest pain, cardiology phone-consultation has the potential to safely impact disposition, primarily by facilitating functional testing in high-risk individuals.
Acute Coronary Syndrome ; Adult ; Cardiology ; Chest Pain ; Electrocardiography ; Emergencies ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart ; Humans ; Medical Records ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Troponin