Thyroid cancer may have small adipose structures detected by microscopy. However, there are no reports of thyroid cancer with gross fat evaluated by radiological methods. We reported a case of a 58-year-old woman with a fat containing thyroid mass. The mass was hyperechoic and ovoid in shape with a smooth margin on ultrasonography. On computed tomography, the mass had markedly low attenuation suggestive of fat, and fine reticular and thick septa-like structures. The patient underwent a right lobectomy. The mass was finally diagnosed as a follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer with massive stromal fat.
Carcinoma/*diagnosis/pathology/ultrasonography ; Exons ; Female ; GTP Phosphohydrolases/genetics ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Membrane Proteins/genetics ; Middle Aged ; Mutation ; Thyroid Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/ultrasonography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

PURPOSE: We investigated the merit of ultrasound (US) features and BRAF(V600E) mutation as an additional study of cytology and compared the diagnostic performances of cytology alone, cytology with US correlation, cytology with BRAF(V600E) mutation, and a combination of cytology, US, and BRAF(V600E) mutation all together. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 185 patients (mean age, 48.4 years; range 20-77 years) with 191 thyroid nodules who underwent US-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with an additional BRAF(V600E) mutation test. Three radiologists highly experienced in thyroid imaging retrospectively reviewed US images and classified each nodule into two categories (positive for malignancy or negative for malignancy). Interobserver variability (IOV) of US assessment between the three readers was estimated using the generalized kappa statistic of Landis and Koch. We also calculated the diagnostic performances of these studies. RESULTS: There were 131 cases of malignancy (131/191, 68.6%) and 60 cases of benign nodules (60/191, 31.4%). In terms of IOV of US assessment, the generalized kappa value was 0.242, indicating fair agreement was reached. The combination of cytology with BRAF(V600E) showed higher specificity (100%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (100%) compared to the combination of cytology, BRAF(V600E), and US (specificity 28.3%, 66.7%, 68.3%; PPV 74.6%, 86.6%, 86.8%, respectively; p<0.001). However, cytology with BRAF(V600E) showed lower sensitivity (84.7%) than cytology with BRAF(V600E) and US (96.2%, 98.5%, 95.4%, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Considering the diagnostic performance and low reproducibility of US, the combination of FNA with BRAF(V600E) is the most reliable and objective method for diagnosing thyroid malignancy.
Adult ; Aged ; Biological Markers ; Biopsy, Fine-Needle ; Carcinoma/*diagnosis/genetics/*ultrasonography ; Cytodiagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/*genetics ; Retrospective Studies ; Thyroid Gland/metabolism/pathology ; Thyroid Neoplasms/*diagnosis/genetics/*ultrasonography ; Thyroid Nodule/metabolism/pathology ; Young Adult

PURPOSE: We investigated the merit of ultrasound (US) features and BRAF(V600E) mutation as an additional study of cytology and compared the diagnostic performances of cytology alone, cytology with US correlation, cytology with BRAF(V600E) mutation, and a combination of cytology, US, and BRAF(V600E) mutation all together. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 185 patients (mean age, 48.4 years; range 20-77 years) with 191 thyroid nodules who underwent US-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with an additional BRAF(V600E) mutation test. Three radiologists highly experienced in thyroid imaging retrospectively reviewed US images and classified each nodule into two categories (positive for malignancy or negative for malignancy). Interobserver variability (IOV) of US assessment between the three readers was estimated using the generalized kappa statistic of Landis and Koch. We also calculated the diagnostic performances of these studies. RESULTS: There were 131 cases of malignancy (131/191, 68.6%) and 60 cases of benign nodules (60/191, 31.4%). In terms of IOV of US assessment, the generalized kappa value was 0.242, indicating fair agreement was reached. The combination of cytology with BRAF(V600E) showed higher specificity (100%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (100%) compared to the combination of cytology, BRAF(V600E), and US (specificity 28.3%, 66.7%, 68.3%; PPV 74.6%, 86.6%, 86.8%, respectively; p<0.001). However, cytology with BRAF(V600E) showed lower sensitivity (84.7%) than cytology with BRAF(V600E) and US (96.2%, 98.5%, 95.4%, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Considering the diagnostic performance and low reproducibility of US, the combination of FNA with BRAF(V600E) is the most reliable and objective method for diagnosing thyroid malignancy.
Adult ; Aged ; Biological Markers ; Biopsy, Fine-Needle ; Carcinoma/*diagnosis/genetics/*ultrasonography ; Cytodiagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/*genetics ; Retrospective Studies ; Thyroid Gland/metabolism/pathology ; Thyroid Neoplasms/*diagnosis/genetics/*ultrasonography ; Thyroid Nodule/metabolism/pathology ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo summarize the morphological features of basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma (BLSIBC), and to look for diagnostic clues for its recognition.

METHODSImmunohistochemistry was performed in 109 cases of invasive ductal carcinoma, with CK5/6, CK14, CK8/ 18, 34betaE12, calponin, p63, CD10, ER, PR and c-erbB-2 monoclonal antibodies. Five subtypes were classified according to immunophenotypes: luminal A subtype (ER+/HER2-), luminal B subtype (ER+/ HER2+), normal breast-like subtype (ER/HER2-), HER2-overexpressing subtype and BLSIBC which was identified with at least one kind of basal-like cytokeratins or markers of myoepithelium and ER/HER2. The microscopic features of basal-like subtype were also analyzed.

RESULTSThe number of luminal A case was 48 (44.0%), luminal B 15 (13.8%), HER2 over-expressing 15 (13.6%), normal breast-like 10 (9.1%), basal-like subtype 19 (17.4%). Besides, the other two cases expressed c-erbB-2 or/and ER plus markers for myoepithelium, thus were excluded from all the five mentioned subtypes. Of the 19 basal-like subtype, CK5/6 was expressed in 16 cases, CK8/18 in 17 cases, CK14 in 11 cases, 34betaE12 in 18 cases, p63 in 5 cases, CD10 in 6 cases, and calponin in 1 case. The diameter of the BLSIBC cases was 1.2-7 cm (averagely 3.9 cm) , and in 6 cases, the tumor diameter was >5 cm. Only one case displayed extensive in situ component, 9 cases were grade 2, and 9 cases were grade 3. Compared to non basal subtype, there were significantly more high grade cases (P <0.01). The morphological features of basal-like subtype were summarized as the followings: pushing margin (13 cases), lymphocytic tissue hyperplasia (18 cases), nest or sheet arrangement (18 cases), nucleus grade 3 and scattered giant or bizarre nuclei (17 cases), syncytial growth (7 cases), and comedo-like necrosis (17 cases). The frequency of these features were significantly more common than non basal subtype (P <0.01).

CONCLUSIONThe morphologic diagnostic features of BLSIBC are pushing margins, lymphocyte infiltration, comedo-like necrosis, gigantic cell and syncytial growth.

Biomarkers, Tumor ; analysis ; Breast Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Carcinoma, Basal Cell ; pathology ; Female ; Genes, erbB-2 ; physiology ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Keratin-5 ; analysis ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Mammography ; instrumentation ; methods ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; physiopathology ; Prognosis ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor ; genetics ; Receptor, ErbB-2 ; analysis ; genetics ; Receptors, Estrogen ; analysis ; Receptors, Progesterone ; analysis ; Ultrasonography ; methods