1.Efficacy of Low-dose Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Byung Su KIM ; Do Youn OH ; Yo Han JOH ; Do Yeun KIM ; Jee Hyun KIM ; Se Hoon LEE ; Dae Ho LEE ; Tae You KIM ; Dae Seog HEO ; Yung Jue BANG ; Noe Kyeong KIM
Cancer Research and Treatment 2001;33(6):469-473
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with low-dose paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable, pathologically proven non-small cell lung cancer were eligible for inclusion in the study. Patients received paclitaxel (145 mg/m2 iv 3 hour D1) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 iv D1) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were enrolled between February 2000 and February 2001. The median age was 53.5 years. Patients with adenocarcinoma numbered 29, squamous cell carcinoma 7, large cell carcinoma 3, and undifferentiated carcinoma 3. Seventeen patients had stage IIIB, 19 had stage IV disease and the remaining 6 displayed recurred disease after previous surgical resection. Four patients terminated treatment early because of hypersensitivity (1) and severe emesis (3). Of the 38 evaluable patients, 14 had PR and the response rate was 36.8%. Among partial responders, 6 patients received additional chest radiation. The median duration of response was 47.9 weeks and the median overall survival was 54.0 weeks. Of the total 176 courses, 14 were delayed, 22 required dose reduction, and grade 3~4 neutropenia occurred in 5.6% of courses. Only one episode of neutropenic fever developed and there were no treatment- related mortalities. Other toxicities were generally mild. CONCLUSION: The combination chemotherapy with low-dose paclitaxel and cisplatin was effective and tolerable in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Adenocarcinoma
;
Carcinoma
;
Carcinoma, Large Cell
;
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung*
;
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
;
Cisplatin*
;
Drug Therapy
;
Drug Therapy, Combination
;
Fever
;
Humans
;
Hypersensitivity
;
Mortality
;
Neutropenia
;
Paclitaxel*
;
Thorax
;
Vomiting
2.Surgery for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Journal of Lung Cancer 2002;1(1):9-14
Surgical resection of locally advanced lung cancer is a challenging subject for thoracic surgeons. Although the operative mortality and morbidity have recently decreased, extended pulmonary resection still remains a high-risk procedure. In selective patients an extended resection would offer an increased chance of a cure from the disease. The most important prognostic factors for a locally advanced lung cancer are the mediastinal lymph node status and the completeness of the resection. Careful preoperative evaluations are required, and every effort to achieve a negative resection margin is of utmost importance during the operation. The recent development of neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems to be promising, but to draw any conclusion regarding the long-term survival benefits, multi-centered randomized trials are mandatory.
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung*
;
Drug Therapy
;
Humans
;
Lung Neoplasms
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Mortality
3.Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 2014;77(3):111-115
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and more than 80% of cases are of non-small cell lung cancer. Although chemotherapy and molecularly targeted therapy may provide some benefit, there is a need for newer therapies for the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. Immunotherapy aims to augment the recognition of cancer as foreign, to stimulate immune responsiveness, and to relieve the inhibition of the immune response that allows tolerance to tumor survival and growth. Two immunotherapeutic approaches showing promise in NSCLC are immune checkpoint inhibition and cancer vaccination. Although currently immunotherapy does not have an established role in the treatment of NSCLC, these patients should be enrolled in formal clinical trials.
Cancer Vaccines
;
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung*
;
Drug Therapy
;
Humans
;
Immunotherapy*
;
Lung Neoplasms
;
Mortality
;
Vaccination
4.Surgical Results of Selected Stage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Ho Ki MIN ; Hyoung Soo KIM ; Jeong Woo YOO ; Yong Soo CHOI ; Kwhanmien KIM ; Jhinjook KIM ; Bong Hyun CHANG ; Young Mog SHIM
The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2003;36(3):157-163
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, patients with stage IIIB non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been considered inoperable due to the short-term survival rate of this disease. However, some recent papers have reported good surgical treatment results for T4 lesions in stage IIIB NSCLC. This study reports the results of stage IIIB NSCLC patients who underwent surgical treatment at our institute. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This study includes 109 patients who were diagnosed with pathological stage IIIA lung cancer and 59 patients who were diagnosed with pathological stage IIIB at our institute between 1994 to December 2001. Patients who underwent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy were excluded from this study. According to the TNM classification, 13 patients from stage IIIA were classified into T3N1, 12 into T1N2, 73 into T2N2 and 11 into T3N2. Stage IIIB patients consisted of 26 patients with T4N0, 18 with T4N1, 14 with T4N2, and 1 with T4N3. RESULT: The 30-day mortality for stage IIIA and IIIB were 4.58% and 5.08% respectively. The overall survival rate at the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 5th year were 69.1%, 53.7%, 41.6%, and 30.7% respectively in stage IIIA and 68.8%, 55.6%, 42.9%, and 35.9% respectively in stage IIIB. Patients with satellite nodules in the same lobe& no lymph node involvement had a survival rate of 53.9% in 3 years compared with 15.2% in patients with satellite nodules in the same lobe with lymph node involvement. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment is recommended for selected stage IIIB NSCLC patients (pathological N0 stage& completely resectable patients), particularly for patients with satellite nodules in the same lobe& no lymph node involvement.
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung*
;
Classification
;
Drug Therapy
;
Humans
;
Lung
;
Lung Neoplasms
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Mortality
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
;
Survival Rate
5.Clinical Overview of Extrapulmonary Small Cell Carcinoma.
Kyeong Ok KIM ; Ha Young LEE ; Sung Ho CHUN ; Sang Joon SHIN ; Min Kyoung KIM ; Kyung Hee LEE ; Myung Soo HYUN ; Sung Hwa BAE ; Hun Mo RYOO
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2006;21(5):833-837
The objective of this study was to review the natural history of extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma (EPSCC) with specific emphasis on clinical features, response to treatment and survival. The records of all patients (n=34) with EPSCC treated at Yeungnam University Medical Center and Catholic University of Daegu Medical Center between 1998 and 2005 were retrieved and reviewed. The primary sites of tumor were the esophagus and thymus in 6 patients (17.6%) each, pancreas and stomach in 5 patients each (14.7%); other sites included were the cervix, abdominal lymph nodes, abdominal wall, bladder, colon, maxillary sinus, nasal cavity, ovary, parotid gland and liver. Twenty three patients out of 34 had limited disease. The median survival of all patients was 14 months. Independent prognostic factors included stage and primary tumor location. The prognosis for the patients with extensive disease and in the gastrointestinal group was unfavorable. EPSCC is a non homogeneous disease entity. As a result of its frequent recurrence, multimodal therapy has a better outcome even in cases of limited disease. Combination chemotherapy plays a central role for treatment of extensive disease in EPSCC. Further multicenter studies are now needed to determine more details regarding disease sub-class and optimal treatment modality.
Thymus Neoplasms/mortality/therapy
;
Survival Rate
;
Stomach Neoplasms/mortality/therapy
;
Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality/therapy
;
Middle Aged
;
Male
;
Humans
;
Female
;
Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality/therapy
;
Combined Modality Therapy
;
Carcinoma, Small Cell/mortality/*therapy
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Aged
;
Adult
6.Combination chemotherapy with topotecan and vincristine for patients with refractory or recurrent small cell lung cancer.
Hyo Seung AHN ; Hye Jin WON ; Hyo Rac LEE ; Young Jin YUH ; Sung Rok KIM
Korean Journal of Medicine 2007;72(6):632-638
BACKGROUDN: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a chemotherapy-sensitive tumor. However, the duration of response is usually short and most patients experience relapses. Topotecan is commonly used for treatment of these patients. Nevertheless, the response rate of topotecan as a single regimen is only about 20% and the resulting severe myelosuppression is troublesome. Vincristine is also an active agent, and it does not compromise the marrow function. In this background, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicities of topotecan and vincristine combination chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with pathologically confirmed SCLC refractory to or recurrent after platinum-based chemotherapy were eligible for this study. The treatment regimen was as follows; topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/day IV bolus on day 1, 2 and 3 and vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg on day 1 (on every cycle)) and day 2 (on odd cycles only). This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks. The efficacy was evaluated in terms of response rate, time to progression and overall survival duration. The toxicities were assessed according to NCI-CTC version 3.0. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were entered into this study. The median age was 63 years (range 43-85 years). Partial response was obtained for 3 patients (response rate 15.8%, 95% CI: 0-32.5%). The median time to progression and survival duration was 51 days and 199 days, respectively. For a total of 52 cycles of treatment, grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 25.0% and 11.5% of the patients, respectively. Grade 2 neurotoxicities were observed in 15.4% of the patients. There was no treatment-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The topotecan and vincritine combination is active and safe for patients with recurrence or refractory SCLC. However, the benefit of adding vincristine to topotecan needs to be confirmed in further studies.
Bone Marrow
;
Drug Therapy
;
Drug Therapy, Combination*
;
Humans
;
Mortality
;
Neutropenia
;
Recurrence
;
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma*
;
Thrombocytopenia
;
Topotecan*
;
Vincristine*
7.Survival of small-cell lung cancer and its determinants of outcome in Singapore.
Chee-Keong TOH ; Siew-Wan HEE ; Wan-Teck LIM ; Swan-Swan LEONG ; Kam-Weng FONG ; Swee-Peng YAP ; Anne A L HSU ; Philip ENG ; Heng-Nung KOONG ; Thirugnanam AGASTHIAN ; Eng-Huat TAN
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2007;36(3):181-188
INTRODUCTIONThe survival and epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in Singapore has not been described. We aim to present the characteristics as well as determine the survival outcome and important prognostic factors for SCLC patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODSA retrospective analysis of SCLC patients diagnosed from 1999 to 2002 was conducted at the Outram campus, Singapore. Clinical characteristics and treatment data were obtained from case records and survival data were checked with the registry of births and deaths on 30 May 2005.
RESULTSOne hundred and eleven patients were analysed. There were 38 (34.2%) limited-disease (LD) patients and 73 (65.8%) extensive-disease (ED) patients. The majority were current or former smokers (94.7% among LD and 94.5% among ED). More patients with LD had good performance status (92% versus 63%, P = 0.0003) and were treated with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (82% versus 48%, P = 0.012). The median survival time of LD patients treated with curative chemoradiotherapy was 14.2 months (95% CI, 10.96 to 17.44). Those given prophylactic cranial irradiation had a median survival time of 16.9 months (95% CI, 11.83 to 21.97). For ED patients, the median survival time was 8.17 months (95%CI, 5.44 to 10.89). None of the factors analysed were significant prognostic factors for LD patients while performance status and type of treatment given were significant among ED patients.
CONCLUSIONSWe found that the characteristics and survival of SCLC patients in Singapore are fairly similar to that of other countries.
Aged ; Carcinoma, Small Cell ; mortality ; therapy ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; mortality ; therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Singapore ; epidemiology
8.Clinical application of adjuvant treatment after operation in patients with stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer.
Xia ZHANG ; Bin ZHANG ; Yajie GAO
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2010;13(4):357-362
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEThe efficacy of complete resection of the cancer for patients with stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited. Synthetic therapy is taken the lead in advocating at present. However, the value of post-operative radiotherapy is not still clear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the survival time and side effects of postoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of stage IIIa NSCLC.
METHODSBetween December 2003 and June 2007, 52 cases that have completed followed-up data with stage IIIa of NSCLC received in the First Affiliated Hospital of Dahan Medical University. Twenty-three patients received postoperative chemoradiotherapy (group A) and 29 patients received postoperative chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy (group B). Group A adopted platinum-based combination chemotherapy for 4-6 cycles. The chemotherapeutics included gemcitabine, vinorelbine and docetaxel. Group B used chemotherapy for 2-4 cycles and then received 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). The prescribe dose of target volume was 50 Gy. The chemotherapy was same as for group A and needed 4 cycles in all. The impact of postoperative adjuvant treatment on survival and toxicity was observed in patients with stage IIIa NSCLC and the reason of disease progression was analyzed.
RESULTSThe median survival was 32.5 months in group A and 31.9 months in group B (P = 0.371). Progression-free survival extended about 6 months (P = 0.044). The survival rate was 87% at 1 year, 0.1% at 2 year, 33% at 3 year for group A compared with 93%, 69%, 45% for group B. The major side effects were hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities, including nausea, vomiting and neutropenia. There was no significant difference in these toxicities between the two groups (P > 0.05). Radioactive esophageal infection occurred in 17.2% of the patients. Acute and late radioactive lung infection occurred in 13.8% and 27.6% of the patients. All these toxicities were below degree 2. Distant metastases were the main reason of disease progression. There was no significant difference in the rates of local recurrence and metastases between the two groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONCombined modality therapy should be the main therapy of stage IIIa NSCLC. The addition of radiotherapy can effectively prolong progression-free survival and don't highly increase the toxicities.
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; drug therapy ; mortality ; radiotherapy ; surgery ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; mortality ; radiotherapy ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged
9.Results of combined therapy for 1260 patients with small cell lung cancer.
Dongfu CHEN ; Xiangru ZHANG ; Weibo YIN ; Yan SUN ; Yanjun MIAO ; Fengyi FENG ; Jinwan WANG ; Mei WANG ; Hongxing ZHANG ; Qinfu FENG ; Binghe XU ; Yuankai SHI
Chinese Journal of Oncology 2002;24(6):602-604
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy of combined modality treatment and determine the prognostic factors for small cell lung cancer (SCLC).
METHODSFrom January 1974 to December 1995, 1260 patients with SCLC treated were retrospectively evaluated, with limited lesions in 732 patients, extensive lesions in 500 and stage unrecorded in 28. 553 patients were alloted into chemotherapy + radiotherapy (C + R) group, 355 into C + R + C group, 97 into R + C group, 126 into C group, 64 into R group and 65 into surgery (S + C + R) group. Patients with limited lesions received 2 - 4 cycles of chemotherapy including COMC, COMP, COMVP and CE-CAP. Radiotherapy was given to a dose of 40 - 70 Gy/4 - 7 w. Radiation portals for patients with limited lesions encompassed the primary tumor, hilar lymphatic drainage areas, partial mediastinum and bilateral supraclavicular regions. Patients with extensive lesions mainly received chemotherapy with or without palliative irradiation.
RESULTSThe overall CR and PR rates were 26.7% and 52.3%. Local recurrence and distant metastasis rates were 58.8% and 61.5%. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 50.2%, 14.7% and 11.7%, with median survival time of 12 months. The era, sex, age, tumor stage and treatment modality were all significant prognostic factors by both uni-variate and multi-variate analyses (P < 0.05). The result of S + C + R rated the best among these modalities and the result of C + R + C was superior to C + R, though the difference of which was not significant.
CONCLUSIONSurgical resection should be considered as one part of comprehensive therapy for small cell lung cancer patients with limited lesions whenever possible. On top of routine chemotherapy early administration of radiotherapy is advisable.
Adult ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Carcinoma, Small Cell ; mortality ; therapy ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; mortality ; therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiotherapy ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome
10.Nodal Station as a Prognostic Factor in Resected Stage IIIA N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Dae Joon KIM ; Kil Dong KIM ; Chi Young KIM ; Kyung Young CHUNG
The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2003;36(7):489-496
BACKGROUND: To clarify the prognostic implication of the location and number of the metastatic mediastinal nodes in resected stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer. MATERIAL AND METHOD: One hundred and seventy-four patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer who eventually proved to have pathologic stage IIIA N2 disease were studied. Patients who received preoperative induction therapy, non-curative operation or defined as operative mortality were excluded from this study. RESULT: In upper lobe tumors, there was no difference in 5-year survival according to the involvement of lower mediastinal nodes (32.3% vs 25.6%, p=0.86). In lower lobe tumors, no differencee was found in 5-year survival according to the involvement of upper mediastinal nodes (25.1% vs 14.1%, p=0.33). There was no significant difference in 5-year survival between patients with or without metastatic subcarinal node (20.9% vs 25.6%, p=0.364). In terms of the number of metastatic mediastinal nodes, 5-year survival was better in single station group (26.3%) than multiple station group (18.3%) (p=0.048). In multiple station N2 group, the patients who received postoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy had better 5-year survival (34.2%) (p=0.01). Cox's proportional hazards model revealed that the age > or =60 (O.R: 1.682, p=.006), multiple station N2 (O.R: 1.503. p=0.021), pneumonectomy (O.R: 1.562, p=0.018), postoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy (O.R: 0.625, p=0.012) were the factors affecting the postoperative survival. CONCLUSION: Multiple station N2 disease was the important prognostic factor for postoperative survival in resected stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer. Postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy were thought to improve the survival in case of multiple station N2 disease.
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung*
;
Drug Therapy
;
Humans
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Mortality
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Pneumonectomy
;
Proportional Hazards Models
;
Radiotherapy