1.Prognosis and staging of superficial endobronchial lung cancer: the impact of invasion depth, tumor diameter, and coexistent pneumonitis or atelectasis.
Chang CHEN ; Hui ZHENG ; Wen GAO ; Ying ZHOU ; Sen JIANG ; Hon-chi SUEN
Chinese Medical Journal 2010;123(12):1505-1509
BACKGROUNDThere are few reports discussing the surgical pathological characteristics of superficial endobronchial lung cancer (SELC) defined as cancer growth limited to the bronchial wall. Its prognosis and corresponding TNM staging have not been fully clarified. Little is known as to whether T status is impacted by the existence of associated atelectasis or pneumonia (which might be controversial, indicating either T1 or T2), and circumstantial invasion depth.
METHODSBetween 1988 and 2007, 81 out of 8817 surgically treated patients met SELC criteria; there was no detectable invasion beyond the bronchial wall. A retrospective review was performed and follow-up information was collected.
RESULTSThe overall five-year survival rate of 81 patients was 85.6%; for N0M0 (n = 67), N1M0 (n = 7) and N2M0 (n = 7) patients, they were 89.3%, 75.0% and 60.0%, respectively. Intraluminal tumor size measured from 0.4 to 3.0 cm; obstructive atelectasis or pneumonia was noted in 14 patients. The presence of tumor-associated obstructive atelectasis or pneumonia did not have a significant impact upon prognosis (P = 0.96), nor did the greatest diameter of the tumor (P = 0.70). Histology showed carcinoma in situ (level one) in 13 cases; invasion of the submucosal layer (level two) in 12, involvement of the muscular layer (level three) in 20, invasion into the space between the muscular layer and cartilage (level four) in 21, and bronchial cartilage infiltration in 15 (level five). In cases without lymphnode metastases, five-year survival was 100% for the first three levels and 84.0% and 61.3% for the level four and level five.
CONCLUSIONSRelative to TNM-based prognostic data, superficial endobronchial lung cancer exhibits increased five-year survival rates, and therefore should be placed at the forefront among tumors in the T1 class, regardless of tumor size or the presence of secondary obstructive atelectasis or pneumonia. Lymphnode metastasis is associated with a worse prognosis. Survival is negatively impacted by tumor infiltration depth into the bronchial wall.
Adult ; Aged ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; mortality ; pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; mortality ; pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Pneumonia ; mortality ; pathology ; Prognosis ; Pulmonary Atelectasis ; mortality ; pathology
2.The Relationship between the Serum Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 Level and the Prognosis of the Disease in Lung Cancer.
Hun Sub SHIN ; Chan Hee JUNG ; Hyun Duk PARK ; Seung Sei LEE
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2004;19(1):48-52
BACKGROUND: Adhesion molecules are related to cell-to-cell interaction and inflammatory interaction. In addition, adhesive interactions between tumor cells and adjacent cells and/or extracellular matrix play important roles in the complex process of tumor growth and development. Among these adhesion molecules, expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) has been identified in colon cancer, bladder cancer, lung cancer, melanoma, pancreatic cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. In the current study, we analyzed serum ICAM-1 concentrations to investigate the relationship between the serum ICAM-1 level and prognosis in patients with lung cancer METHODS: Serum ICAM-1 was measured in 84 patients with lung cancer according to the pathologic type and clinical stage using the ICAM-1 ELISA kit. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyse survival time. RESULTS: There was no difference in serum ICAM-1 concentration among the different stages of lung cancer. Furthermore, there was no difference observed between histologic tumor type with regard to serum ICAM-1 concentration. Although the difference was not significant, the overall survival times of patients with a low serum ICAM-1 concentration (< 306 ng/mL) was longer than that of patients with a high concentration (> or=306 ng/mL) in non-small cell lung cancer patients. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that high levels of serum ICAM-1 reflect poor prognosis for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Aged
;
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/*blood/mortality/pathology
;
Carcinoma, Small Cell/*blood/mortality/pathology
;
Female
;
Human
;
Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1/*blood
;
Lung Neoplasms/*blood/mortality/pathology
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Prognosis
;
Survival Analysis
3.Prognostic factor analysis of pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.
Xin WANG ; Gang MA ; Tiehua RONG ; Zhifan HUANG ; Mingtian YANG ; Canguang ZENG ; Peng LIN ; Hao LONG ; Jianhua FU ; Siyu WANG ; Xuening YANG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2002;40(8):567-570
OBJECTIVESTo identify predictors of survival following pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and provide evidence for the revision of patient selection criteria.
METHODS81 cases of pneumonectomy for NSCLC from January 1990 to May 1996 at our hospital were reviewed retrospectively. There were 65 men (80.2%) and 16 women (19.8%), with a mean age 53.4 +/- 9.4 years (range 20 - 68 years). Predominant histological types included squamous cell carcinoma (54.3%), adenocarcinoma (24.7%), and squamoadenocarcinoma (17.3%). After follow-up for more than 5 years, data were examined using the chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox-mantel test. The possible factors affecting survival were tested with univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTSThe 5-year survival of N(0), N(1) and N(2) disease of NSCLC following pneumonectomy was (20.8 +/- 9.9)%, (15.4 +/- 10.0)% and (4.0 +/- 2.8)%, respectively. There was no perioperative death. The operative complications morbidity was 22.2%. Factors adversely affecting survival with univariate analysis included age over 60 years for right pneumonectomy, cardiopulmonary complications, adenocarcinoma, peripheral location, tumor greatest dimension more than 10 cm, chest wall involvement and N(2) disease. Factors adversely affecting survival with multivariate analysis included cardiopulmonary complications, greatest tumor dimension more than 10 cm, chest wall involvement and N(2) disease.
CONCLUSIONSPneumonectomy provides survival benefit with a high operative complications morbidity. Old age (>/= 60 years) for right pneumonectomy, cardiopulmonary complications, adenocarcinoma, and N(2) disease may be negative prognostic factors of long-term survival. Patient selection should be based on cardiopulmonary evaluation and the stage of disease.
Adult ; Aged ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Pneumonectomy ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate
4.The Prognostic Significance of Multiple Station N2 in Patients with Surgically Resected Stage IIIA N2 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Jin Gu LEE ; Chang Young LEE ; In Kyu PARK ; Dae Joon KIM ; Sang Ho CHO ; Kil Dong KIM ; Kyung Young CHUNG
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2008;23(4):604-608
Mediastinal (N2) lymph node involvement is heterogenous with huge variation in the extent and grouped together under stage IIIA. However, they showed a different survival even in the same stage. We tried to determine the prognostic implication of the multiple station N2 lymph node metastasis in stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The survival of stage IIIA N2 was analyzed according to the number of N2 station and their survival was compared with that of stage IIIB. In stage IIIA N2 NSCLC, multivariate analysis indicated that multiple station N2 was one of the independent prognostic factors for poor survival. The 5-yr survival of multiple station N2 IIIA (20.4%) was lower than that of single station N2 IIIA (33.8%) significantly (p=0.016). but when it was compared with that of stage IIIB (15.5%), there was no difference. Therefore, we suggest that multiple station N2 should be considered similar to stage IIIB disease with regard to predicting survival and accordingly should receive a new position in the TNM staging system.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/*mortality/pathology
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Lung Neoplasms/*mortality/pathology
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Prognosis
;
Survival Rate
5.Study on the prognosis of the T1a non-small cell lung cancer.
Zhongwu HU ; Yang SHEN-TU ; Zhengping DING ; Qiang TAN ; Yunzhong ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2010;13(3):206-210
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEThe new edition of the TNM staging for lung and pleural tumours has been finished, which put weight on the extent of primary tumor as one of the important prognosises. But little study has performed on the primary tumor extent < or = 2 cm. The aim of this study is to explore the prognosis of patients with tumor extent < or = 2 cm in stage I of non-small cell lung cancer, which helps us to choose the best treatment for these patients.
METHODSRetrospective study on the clinical response and survival time of whom underwent complete surgical resection and diagnosed as T1a of stage I NSCLC from 1998 to 2004 was analyzed. Data was analyzed by SPSS 17.0 software.
RESULTSOverall survival rate was 80.8%. By the study, age (P = 0.241), gender (P = 0.175), history of smoking (P = 0.845), pathologic type ( P =0.265), and systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy (SML )(P = 0.918) or not, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or not ( P = 0.616) and visceral pleural invasion (P = 0.827) were not the prognosises of these patients. Only the tumor differentiation such as poorly differentiated was the important prognosis ( P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONIn the tumor extent < or = 2 cm of stage I non-small cell lung cancer, the visceral pleural invasion maybe not influence the patients survival. The tumor differentiation is one of the important prognostic factors.
Adult ; Aged ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; mortality ; pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; mortality ; pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies
6.Comparison of the Survival Time in the Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Different Organ Metastasis.
Bingqun WU ; Shenhai WEI ; Jintao TIAN ; Xiaoping SONG ; Pengcheng HU ; Yong CUI
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2019;22(2):105-110
BACKGROUND:
The purpose of this study is to compare the survival time of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with different organ metastasis. Among all cancers, the morbidity and mortality of lung cancer is the highest worldwide, which may caused by local recurrence and distant metastasis, and the location of metastasis may predict the prognosis of patients.
METHODS:
A total of 117,542 patients with NSCLC diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 were enrolled from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) databases, and the relationship between distant metastasis and survival time was retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS:
Of all the 117,542 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer, 42,071 (35.8%) patients had different degrees of distant metastasis during their medical history, including 26,932 single organ metastases and 15,139 multiple organ metastases, accounting for 64.0% and 36.0% of the metastatic patients respectively. Compared with patients with no metastasis, whose median survival time was 21 months, the median survival time of patients with metastases was 7 months (lung), 6 months (brain), 5 months (bone), 4 months (liver), and 3 months (multiple organ) respectively, and the difference was significant (P<0.001, except liver vs multiple organ P=0.650); Most patients with NSCLC (88.4%) eventually died of lung cancer.
CONCLUSIONS
Distant metastasis of NSCLC patients indicates poor prognosis. In NSCLC patients with single organ metastasis, the prognosis of lung metastasis is the best, and liver metastasis is the worst, and multiple organ metastasis is worse than single organ metastasis.
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Bone Neoplasms
;
mortality
;
secondary
;
Brain Neoplasms
;
mortality
;
secondary
;
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
;
mortality
;
pathology
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Liver Neoplasms
;
mortality
;
secondary
;
Lung Neoplasms
;
mortality
;
pathology
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Prognosis
;
Retrospective Studies
7.Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 Gene Amplification in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer.
Jian-Long MIAO ; Rui-Juan LIU ; Jin-Hua ZHOU ; Shu-Hua MENG
Chinese Medical Journal 2016;129(23):2868-2872
OBJECTIVETo review the prevalence and prognostic significance of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) amplification and to establish an association between FGFR1 amplification and the clinical characteristics of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
DATA SOURCESWe searched PubMed for English-language studies published between January 2010 and May 2016.
STUDY SELECTIONWe included all relevant articles, with no limitation of study design.
RESULTSFGFR1 amplification was reported in 8.7-20.0% of NSCLC cases and was significantly more frequent in squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) (9.7-28.3%) than in adenocarcinomas (ADCs) (0-15.0%). The rates of FGFR1 amplification were as follows: males, 13.9-22.1%; females, 0-20.1%; Stage I NSCLC, 9.3-24.1%; Stage II NSCLC, 12.9-25.0%; Stage III NSCLC, 8.2-19.5%; Stage IV NSCLC, 0-12.5%; current smokers, 13.3-29.0%; former smokers, 2.5-23.0%; and nonsmokers, 0-22.2%. Overall survival was 43.9-70.8 months in patients with FGFR1 amplification and 42.4-115.0 months in patients with no FGFR1 amplification; disease-free survival was 22.5-58.5 months and 52.4-94.6 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONSFGFR1 amplification is more frequent in SCCs than in ADCs. The association between FGFR1 amplification and clinical characteristics (gender, smoking status, and disease stage) and the prognostic significance of FGFR1 amplification in NSCLC remain controversial.
Adenocarcinoma ; genetics ; mortality ; pathology ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; genetics ; mortality ; pathology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; genetics ; mortality ; pathology ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Gene Amplification ; genetics ; Humans ; Male ; Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1 ; genetics
8.Pattern of Recurrence after Curative Resection of Local (Stage I and II) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Difference According to the Histologic Type.
Yong Soo CHOI ; Young Mog SHIM ; Kwhanmien KIM ; Jhingook KIM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2004;19(5):674-676
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pattern of recurrence after complete resection of pathological stage I, II non-small cell lung cancer, especially according to the cell type. We reviewed the clinical records of 525 patients operated on for pathologic stage I and II lung cancer. The histologic type was found to be squamous in 253 and non-squamous in 229 patients. Median follow-up period was 40 months. Recurrences were identified in 173 (36%) of 482 enrolled patients; distant metastasis in 70%, distant and local recurrence in 11%, and local recurrence in 19%. Distant metastasis was more common in non-squamous than in squamous cell carcinoma (p=0.044). Brain metastasis was more frequently identified in non-squamous mthan in squamous cell carcinoma (24.2% vs. 7.3%. p=0.005). Multivariate analyses showed that cell type is the significant risk factor for recurrence-free survival in stage I and stage II non-small cell lung cancer. Recurrence-free survival curves showed that non-squamous cell carcinoma had similar risks during early periods of follow-up and more risks after 2 yr from the operation compared to squamous cell carcinoma. Pathological stage and histologic type significantly influence recurrence-free survival.
Brain Neoplasms/mortality/secondary
;
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/*mortality/*pathology/surgery
;
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality/pathology/surgery
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Lung Neoplasms/*mortality/*pathology/surgery
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality/pathology
;
Neoplasm Staging/*mortality
;
Pneumonectomy
;
Risk Factors
;
Survival Analysis
9.Lung cancer: recent advances.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2010;39(11):819-821
Antineoplastic Agents
;
adverse effects
;
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
;
epidemiology
;
mortality
;
pathology
;
Erlotinib Hydrochloride
;
Global Health
;
Humans
;
Lung Neoplasms
;
epidemiology
;
mortality
;
pathology
;
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
;
adverse effects
;
Quinazolines
;
adverse effects
;
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor
;
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
;
epidemiology
;
mortality
;
pathology
10.The Relationship between Serum VEGF Concentration and Prognosis of Lung Cancer.
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2003;18(4):207-211
BACKGROUND: VEGF is an important factor for angiogenesis. Although many previous studies have reported an increased serum VEGF concentration in various malignant tumors, there are few studies on the relationship between serum VEGF concentration and its prognosis. This study investigated whether serum VEGF concentration is a prognostic indicator for lung cancer. METHODS: Using the ELISA kit, we measured the serum VEGF concentrations of 86 patients diagnosed with lung cancer on histologic examination. With a cut-off value of 686 pg/mL, the patients were classified as low-concentration (< 686 pg/mL, n=58) or high-concentration (> or=686 pg/mL, n=28) based on their mean serum VEGF concentration values to compare survival rates, and serum VEGF concentrations for different histologic types and stages. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in serum VEGF concentration based on stage and histologic type between the two groups. Moreover, there was no significant difference in survival rate between the high-concentration and low-concentration groups (p=0.86). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that serum VEGF concentration is not associated with the prognosis of lung cancer.
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/*blood/*mortality/pathology
;
Female
;
Human
;
Lung Neoplasms/*blood/*mortality/pathology
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Prognosis
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Survival Rate
;
Tumor Markers, Biological/*blood
;
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/*blood