Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; radiotherapy ; therapy ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; radiotherapy ; therapy ; Radiotherapy ; methods

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; diagnostic imaging ; radiotherapy ; therapy ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; diagnostic imaging ; radiotherapy ; therapy ; Ultrasonography

Biological Therapy ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; drug therapy ; radiotherapy ; therapy ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; radiotherapy ; therapy ; Radiography, Interventional ; Ultrasonic Therapy

The role of radiotherapy in practice is mainly palliative. According to the Practice Guidelines for Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2009) developed by the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group and the National Cancer Center, Korea, radiotherapy can be applied for 1) refractoriness to trans-catheter hepatic arterial chemo-embolization, 2) portal vein tumor thrombosis, and 3) palliative therapy to reduce the symptoms caused by hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiotherapy is one of the most rapidly developing fields of medical research. Recent advances in intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided radiotherapy, and respiratory-gated radiotherapy technologies have enabled more accurate and precise radiation delivery for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Proton therapy is also emerging as a candidate therapy for ablative measures for patients ineligible for other curative local therapies. Due to recent advances in radiotherapy technologies, radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma has been evolving into stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, which delivers an ablative dose of radiation in 1 to 4 sessions. Clinical series have confirmed that it is safe in Child-Pugh A patients and local control is sustained. The possibility for performing phase 3 randomized clinical trials involving the radiotherapy modality has increased with those advances. Not merely palliative, the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma will be expanded to potentially curative therapy in patients who are ineligible for other curative local therapies.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular* ; Humans ; Korea ; Liver Neoplasms ; Palliative Care ; Portal Vein ; Proton Therapy ; Radiotherapy* ; Radiotherapy, Image-Guided ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ; Thrombosis

Eighty-four patients with unresectable primary hepatocellular carcinoma due either to locally advanced lesion or to association with liver cirrhosis were treated with combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia from April 1988 to January 1991. Purpose of this study was to assess thermometry, response rate, toxicity, and survival in those patients. External radiotherapy was given with a total of 30.6 Gy/3.5 wks. Hyperthermia was given twice a week with a total of 6 treatment sessions using an 8 MHz radiofrequency capacitive type heating machine. Each hyperthermia session was started within 30 min following radiotherapy and continued for 30-60 min. Thermal data were analysed with maximum, minimum, and average temperatures of the tumors. Thermal mapping was also done. In thermometry results, maximum, minimum, and average temperatures of the tumors were 41.9 +/- 1.3 degrees C, 39.9 +/- 1.0 degrees C, and 40.8 +/- 0.9 degrees C, respectively. The fraction over 40 degrees C was 73 +/- 32% with a wide variation from 15% to 100%. Among 67 assessable patients, 27 patients showed tumor regression of more than 50% of the original tumor volume (40.3% response rate). Symptomatic improvement was observed in 78.6% of the patients. Acute toxicities during the treatment were mostly acceptable local pain (51.2%) and local fat necrosis (13.1%). The actuarial 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates were 44.8%, 19.7%, and 15.6%, respectively. Median survival was 6 months. In view of acceptable toxicities and the current rate of survival, further evaluation of combined treatment of radiotherapy and hyperthermia for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma is warranted.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/radiotherapy/*therapy ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Female ; Human ; *Hyperthermia, Induced ; Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy/*therapy ; Male ; Middle Age ; Remission Induction

External beam radiotherapy, transarterial chemoembolization and sorafenib are currently standard treatments for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein thrombosis. However, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy has been applied to advanced stage HCC with a view to improving the therapeutic effect. We experienced a case of advanced HCC with clinical complete response after hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and radiation therapy and report that.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular* ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Drug Therapy* ; Hepatic Artery* ; Portal Vein* ; Radiotherapy* ; Thrombosis* ; Venous Thrombosis

Surgical resection is mainstay treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its prognosis is poor, because of the high incidence of HCC recurrence (cumulative 5-year HCC recurrence rate of 70-80%). The most common site of HCC recurrence is the remnant liver, and extrahepatic recurrence occurs in 6.7-13.5% of patients. Because the tumor characteristics in extrahepatic recurrence are usually multiple and aggressive, the optimal treatment modality has not yet been determined. We report a case of complete remission and long term survival over 60 months in patient with extrahepatic metastasis after curative resection of HCC by aggressive treatment, which include lung resection for lung metastasis, radiotherapy for mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and systemic chemotherapy.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular* ; Drug Therapy* ; Humans ; Incidence ; Liver ; Lung* ; Lymph Nodes ; Metastasectomy ; Neoplasm Metastasis* ; Prognosis ; Radiotherapy* ; Recurrence

In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), sorafenib is the only approved systemic chemotherapy, and has been applied for those with advanced HCC especially with systemic metastasis. However, the treatment results are suboptimal leaving many cases with disease progression despite the use of optimum dose. There is no established guideline for those that fail to respond to sorafenib treatment. In this case, a 46-years-old male with metastatic lung cancer from HCC experienced progression despite sorafenib treatment. Then, the patient received surgical resection of the metastatic lung mass followed by radiation therapy and achieved complete remission for 10 months after the surgical treatment and radiation therapy. Alpha-fetoprotein level was normalized and complete remission has been maintained.
alpha-Fetoproteins ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular* ; Disease Progression ; Drug Therapy ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; Lung* ; Male ; Neoplasm Metastasis* ; Radiotherapy

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal dose of proton beam therapy (PBT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inoperable HCC patients who had naive, recurrent, or residual tumor to treatment were considered eligible for PBT. Patients received PBT with 60 GyE in 20 fractions (dose level 1; equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions [EQD2], 65 GyE10); 66 GyE in 22 fractions (dose level 2; EQD2, 71.5 GyE10); or 72 GyE in 24 fractions (dose level 3; EQD2, 78 GyE10). Dose-limiting toxicity was determined by grade > or = 3 acute toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled; eight, seven, and 12 patients were treated with dose levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Overall, treatment was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities. The complete response (CR) rates of primary tumors after PBT for dose levels 1, 2, and 3 were 62.5% (5/8), 57.1% (4/7), and 100% (12/12), respectively (p=0.039). The 3-and 5-year local progression-free survival (LPFS) rates among 26 patients, excluding one patient who underwent liver transplantation after PBT due to its probable significant effect on disease control, were 79.9% and 63.9%, respectively, and the 3-and 5-year overall survival rates were 56.4% and 42.3%, respectively. The 3-year LPFS rate was significantly higher in patients who achieved CR than in those who did not (90% vs. 40%, p=0.003). CONCLUSION: PBT is safe and effective and an EQD2 > or = 78 GyE10 should be delivered for achievement of local tumor control.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular* ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Liver Transplantation ; Neoplasm, Residual ; Proton Therapy* ; Radiotherapy ; Survival Rate

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the initial outcomes of proton beam therapy (PBT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in terms of tumor response and safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HCC patients who were not indicated for standard curative local modalities and who were treated with PBT at Samsung Medical Center from January 2016 to February 2017 were enrolled. Toxicity was scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Tumor response was evaluated using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). RESULTS: A total of 101 HCC patients treated with PBT were included. Patients were treated with an equivalent dose of 62–92 GyE10. Liver function status was not significantly affected after PBT. Greater than 80% of patients had Child-Pugh class A and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 1 up to 3-months after PBT. Of 78 patients followed for three months after PBT, infield complete and partial responses were achieved in 54 (69.2%) and 14 (17.9%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: PBT treatment of HCC patients showed a favorable infield complete response rate of 69.2% with acceptable acute toxicity. An additional follow-up study of these patients will be conducted.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Liver ; Proton Therapy ; Protons ; Radiotherapy ; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors