To explore the feasibility and efficacy of isolated caudate lobe resection for caudate lobe in huge hepatocellular carcinoma(10 cm or larger in diameter).
 Methods: Clinical data of 27 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 10 cm who underwent isolated caudate lobe resection from January 2001 to December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed.
 Results: All the patients successfully completed the operation. There was no postoperative death. Median operative time was 288 min, and the estimated intraoperative blood loss was 2 260 mL. Postoperative morbidity rate was 44.4%. The patients were discharged successfully after active treatment. Overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 80.2%, 52.1%, and 27.1%, respectively.
 Conclusion: Isolated caudate lobe resection is safe and effective for caudate lobe huge hepatocellular carcinoma.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; mortality ; surgery ; Hepatectomy ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; mortality ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome

Since the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) develops in cirrhotic liver and is often multicentric, liver transplantation (LT) seems to be a rational approach for the treatment of HCC. Current selection criteria of LT for HCC are Milan criteria (single nodule < or = 5 cm , or < or = 3 nodules and Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/etiology/*mortality/*surgery ; Humans ; Liver Cirrhosis/*complications ; Liver Neoplasms/etiology/*mortality/*surgery ; *Liver Transplantation ; Salvage Therapy ; Survival Rate

No abstract available.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality/*surgery ; Hepatectomy ; Human ; Liver Neoplasms/mortality/*surgery ; Liver Transplantation ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Survival Rate

Along with the improvement of surgical techniques and post-transplant management, the role of liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment has become increasingly important. Although HCC now is an indication of liver transplantation, the criteria of HCC candidates selection vary in different transplantation centers in China. On the contrary, the HCC candidates selection criteria in western countries are relatively strict, among which Milan criteria, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria, and Pittsburgh modified TNM criteria are widely acknowledged. However, Milan criteria and UCSF criteria only focus on tumor diameter and tumor number but ignore some important risk factors such as vascular invasion and histological differentiation. In our opinion, the biological behaviors of tumor are as important as tumor burden. A set of new candidates selection and prognostic criteria of liver transplantation in HCC patients named "Hangzhou criteria" has been established based on China's real situations and on the results of our long-term research. Hangzhou criteria expands and surpasses Milan criteria, including several important risk factors. According to Hangzhou criteria, more HCC patients are given opportunities to receive liver transplantation and achieved favorable long-term survival. Also in this article, we reviewed the peri-transplantation therapy of HCC to reduce the tumor recurrence and improve the long-term survival after transplantation for the purpose of making liver transplantation more effective and reliable for HCC treatment.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; China ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Liver Transplantation ; Patient Selection ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUNDPittsburgh modified TNM criteria is one of the prognostic models of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we applied this prognostic system in a series of HCC patients receiving OLT to verify its reliability in the clinical prognostic prediction.

METHODSThe clinical record and follow-up data of 102 patients with HCC underwent OLT was collected. The patients were classified by 3 staging systems: the Pittsburgh Modified TNM Criteria, International Union Against Cancer (UICC) pTNM Staging System, and Milan Criteria. Survival rates of the patients were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-Rank test, and then the prognostic values of the 3 staging systems were compared.

RESULTSAmong the 3 staging systems, the Pittsburgh Modified TNM Criteria showed the best stratification of patients with different prognosis. The overall survival rates of the patients at the Pittsburgh modified TNM stage I, II, III, and IV were 94.4%, 83.3%, 58.2%, and 36.8% at 1 year, and 79.4%, 62.5%, 26.2%, and 10.5% at 3 years, respectively. For those patients exceeding the Milan Criteria, the patients at Pittsburgh stages I and II had a significant higher survival rate than those at Pittsburgh stages III and IV (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONSThe Pittsburgh Modified TNM Criteria is a more reliable postoperative staging system than the UICC pTNM staging system for HCC patients receiving OLT. As providing more accurate prognostic classification, it could be reasonable to combine the Milan Criteria for recipient selection.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Liver Transplantation ; Male ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prognosis ; Survival Rate

OBJECTIVETo investigate the value of liver transplantation for late hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODSThirty-six patients were treated by liver transplantation from August 2000 to February 2002, of which 15 patients had had advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and thirteen of these 15 patients were evaluated for results.

RESULTSThe 1-year survival rate was 86% (6/7). Only one patient died of recurrence within 6 months. The tumor-free survival was 5 to 19 months. Till February 2002, two patients have survived for 10 months and 19 months with recurrence.

CONCLUSIONIn our country, if the patients can afford liver transplantation, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma without extrahepatic metastasis is still indicated for liver transplantation, since some patients may survive relatively long.

Adult ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; mortality ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; mortality ; surgery ; Liver Transplantation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recently, mortality following surgical resection for hepatocelluar carcinoma has been reduced significantly. Morbidity, however, is still significant. This study evaluated the risk factors leading to morbidity and mortality. METHODS: 510 patients who had a hepatic resection form Nov. 1994 to Dec. 2001 were included. The patient demographics showed a mean age of 51.6 years with a male to female ratio of 4:1. The HBsAg was positive in 76.0% and the anti-HCV was positive in 8.2%. The mean tumor size was 5.2 cm, 26.2% of patients had preoperative transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE), and 8.7% had preoperative percutaneous transhepatic portal embolization (PTPE). Limited resection was performed in 259 cases (50.7%), and major resection was conducted in 251 cases (49.1%). Risk factors included age, sex, laboratory findings (liver function test, prothrombin time, albumin, glucose, alpha-fetoprotein, ICG test), preoperative TAE, PTPE, operation type, operation time, intraoperative transfusion, tumor size, and cirrhosis. RESULTS: The morbidity was 10.5% (54 cases). Operative death occurred in 5 cases (1.0%). Hospital death, including operative death, occurred in 6 cases (1.2%). Five cases were associated with hepatic failure and 1 case was associated with aspiration pneumonia accompanying hepatic failure. Transfusion (P=0.002), glucose (P=0.002), and prothrombin time (P=0.038) were significantly related to morbidity. Age (P=0.028), glucose (P=0.011), and TAE (P=0.046) were significantly related to mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative transfusion, which is mainly related to intraoperative bleeding, should be reduced if possible to decrease morbidity. Diabetes mellitus patients and the elderly need careful perioperative management.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/*mortality/surgery ; English Abstract ; Female ; Hepatectomy/adverse effects/*mortality ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms/*mortality/surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Risk Factors ; Survival Rate

OBJECTIVETo compare the effectiveness of percutaneous microwave ablation ( MWA) versus hepatectomy for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODSFrom August 2002 to March 2012, one hundred and twenty-two patients with multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma (diameters 1 to 7 cm, 2 to 4 lesions) were treated by either complete MWA or radical hepatectomy, and their clinical data were collected and analyzed.The patients were divided into MWA group (n = 50) and resection group (n = 72), and the resection group was matched by MWA group based on clinical parameters. The survival and complications in the two groups were compared.

RESULTSThe overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 100.0%, 73.0% and 62.0%, respectively, in the MWA group, and 80.0%, 56.0%, and 41.0%, respectively, in the resection group (P < 0.05). The corresponding recurrence-free survival rates were 88.0%, 63.0%, and 52.0% in the MWA group, and 68.0%, 45.0%, and 36.0%, respectively, in the resection group (P< 0.05). The multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that albumin level, performance status, treatment modality, and tumor size were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONCompared with hepatectomy, percutaneous microwave ablation is a minimally invasive and reproducible procedure, and can improve the survival in patients with multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; mortality ; radiotherapy ; surgery ; Catheter Ablation ; Genetic Engineering ; Hepatectomy ; mortality ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; mortality ; radiotherapy ; surgery ; Microwaves ; therapeutic use ; Regression Analysis ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent malignant tumors worldwide. Liver transplantation (LT) is known as a curative and therapeutic modality. However, the survival rates of recipients after LT are still not good enough because of tumor recurrence. To improve the survival rates of recipients after LT, identifying predictive factors for prognosis after LT and establishing a model assessing prognosis are very important to HCC patients. There has recently been a lot of clinical and basic research on recurrence and prognosis after LT. Progress has been made, especially in selection criteria for LT recipients and risk factors for predicting prognosis after LT. Hangzhou criteria, in line with China's high current incidence rate of primary liver, are first proposed by Chinese scholars of LT, and are accepted world-wide, and make an important contribution to the development of LT.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; mortality ; surgery ; China ; epidemiology ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; mortality ; surgery ; Liver Transplantation ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; mortality ; Patient Selection ; Prognosis ; Risk Factors ; Survival Rate

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the role of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODSData of 92 consecutive orthotopic liver transplantations (OLTs) performed during January 1999 and February 2005 at our institution were analyzed.

RESULTSOf the 92 recipients, 8 HCC patients were stage I, 13 were stage II, 12 stage III and 59 stage IV (UICC TNM staging system). Overall 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-year patient survival rates were 65.3%, 27.0%, 20.0%, and 6.9%, respectively. When OLT indications were considered, best recipients survival was obtained in stage I patients (100.0%, 100.0%, 66.7%, and 50.0% at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively) and stage II patients (85.7%, 66.7%, and 66.7% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively). Whereas, 1, 2, 3 and 5-year recipients survival rates were 50.0%, 0, 0, 0 in stage III patients, and 58.1%, 20.0%, 13.0% and 5.0% in stage IV patients.

CONCLUSIONSThe prognosis of different stages of HCC patients who underwent OLT was significantly different. The OLT recipients with HCC should be strictly selected. Long-term recipient survival could be obtained in stage I and stage II patients.

Adult ; Aged ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; surgery ; Liver Transplantation ; mortality ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Survival Rate