3.Scientific rationale and applicability of dose-reponse models for environmental carcinogens.
Dongchun SHIN ; Yong CHUNG ; Jongman KIM ; Seongim G LEE ; Mansik HWANG
Korean Journal of Preventive Medicine 1996;29(1):27-42
This study described methods to predict human health risk associated with exposure to environmental carciongens using animal bioassay data. Also, biological assumption for various dose-response models were reviewed. To illustrate the process of risk estimate using relevant dose-response models such as Log-normal, Mantel-Bryan, Weibull and Multistage model, we used four animal carcinogenesis bioassy data of chloroform and chloroform concentrations of tap water measured in large cities of korea from 1987 to 1995. As a result, in the case of using average concentration in exposure data and 95 % upper boud unit risk of Multistage model, excess cancer risk(RISK I) was about 1.9 x 10-6, in the case of using probability distribution of cumulative exposure data and unit risks, those risks(RISK II) which were simulated by Monte-Carlo analysis were about 2.4 x 10(-6) and 7.9 x 10(-5) at 50 and 95 percentile, respectively. Therefore risk estimated by Monte-Carlo analysis using probability distribution of input variables may be more conservative.
Animals
;
Biological Assay
;
Carcinogenesis
;
Carcinogens, Environmental*
;
Chloroform
;
Humans
;
Korea
;
Water
5.Air pollution: a smoking gun for cancer.
Wei ZHANG ; Chao-Nan QIAN ; Yi-Xin ZENG
Chinese Journal of Cancer 2014;33(4):173-175
Once considered a taboo topic or stigma, cancer is the number one public health enemy in the world. Once a product of an almost untouchable industry, tobacco is indisputably recognized as a major cause of cancer and a target for anticancer efforts. With the emergence of new economic powers in the world, especially in highly populated countries such as China, air pollution has rapidly emerged as a smoking gun for cancer and has become a hot topic for public health debate because of the complex political, economic, scientific, and technologic issues surrounding the air pollution problem. This editorial and the referred articles published in this special issue of the Chinese Journal of Cancer discuss these fundamental questions. Does air pollution cause a wide spectrum of cancers? Should air pollution be considered a necessary evil accompanying economic transformation in developing countries? Is an explosion of cancer incidence coming to China and how soon will it arrive? What must be done to prevent this possible human catastrophe? Finally, the approaches for air pollution control are also discussed.
Air Pollution
;
adverse effects
;
Carcinogens, Environmental
;
toxicity
;
China
;
Humans
;
Neoplasms
;
etiology
;
Risk Factors
;
Smoking
;
adverse effects
6.Pollution characteristics, source analysis, and risk assessment of metal and metalloid in PM2.5 of Shijiazhuang city.
Hui KANG ; Ming Yang GUAN ; Feng Ge CHEN
Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine 2022;56(4):507-511
In 2020, the mass concentration of PM2.5 in Shijiazhuang urban area was(80.30±71.43)μg/m3. The Spearman correlation analysis between metals and metalloids showed that Sb with Cd, Pb, Ni, Se, Cd with Pb, Ni, Se, Pb with Ni, Se, Ni with Se, and Se with Tl were positively correlated, with a coefficient greater than 0.5. The main sources of metals and metalloids of PM2.5 were traffic emissions, fuel combustion, metal smelting and dust. The HQ values of Pb, Hg and Mn for each population were less than 1, with lower non-carcinogenic risk. The R values of carcinogenic risk of Ni and Cd in each population were less than 1×10-6, which could be acceptable risk level for the population. The R values of carcinogenic risk of As and Cr in different populations were between 1×10-6 and 1×10-4, with potential carcinogenic risk, particularly higher in adult males.
Adult
;
Cadmium
;
Carcinogens/analysis*
;
Dust/analysis*
;
Environmental Monitoring
;
Humans
;
Lead
;
Male
;
Metalloids/analysis*
;
Risk Assessment
7.Maternal and fetal exposure to four carcinogenic environmental metals.
Huai GUAN ; Feng-Yuan PIAO ; Xiao-Wei LI ; Qiu-Juan LI ; Lei XU ; Kazuhito YOKOYAMA
Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 2010;23(6):458-465
OBJECTIVETo examine maternal and fetal exposure levels to four carcinogenic metals, arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), nickel (Ni), and beryllium (Be), and to investigate their environmental influences.
METHODSMetal concentrations in maternal and umbilical cord blood were measured by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Environmental factors that might play a role in exposure were analyzed using Mann-Whitney nonparametric U-tests and multiple linear regression.
RESULTSThe concentrations of As, Cd, and Ni in umbilical cord blood (5.41, 0.87, and 139.54 μg/L) were significantly lower than those in maternal blood (6.91, 1.93, and 165.93 μg/L). There were significant positive correlations between the maternal and cord concentrations of each carcinogen. Our results showed that: (i) exposures to potentially harmful occupational factors during pregnancy were associated with high levels of maternal As, Cd, and Ni; (ii) living close to major transportation routes (<500 m) or exposure to second-hand smoke during pregnancy increased the maternal Cd levels and (iii) living close to industrial chimneys induced high maternal Ni levels. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that these environmental factors remained significant in models of the influences of these four carcinogens.
CONCLUSIONBoth mothers and fetuses had been exposed to As, Cd, Ni, and Be. The increased levels of these carcinogens in pregnant women were associated with some detrimental environmental factors, such as occupational exposure, contact with second-hand smoke and living close to major transportation routes or industrial chimneys.
Carcinogens, Environmental ; toxicity ; Environmental Exposure ; Environmental Pollutants ; toxicity ; Female ; Humans ; Maternal-Fetal Exchange ; Metals ; toxicity ; Pregnancy ; Time Factors
8.OccIDEAS: An Innovative Tool to Assess Past Asbestos Exposure in the Australian Mesothelioma Registry.
Ewan MACFARLANE ; Geza BENKE ; Malcolm R SIM ; Lin FRITSCHI
Safety and Health at Work 2012;3(1):71-76
Malignant mesothelioma is an uncommon but rapidly fatal disease for which the principal aetiological agent is exposure to asbestos. Mesothelioma is of particular significance in Australia where asbestos use was very widespread from the 1950s until the 1980s. Exposure to asbestos includes occupational exposure associated with working with asbestos or in workplaces where asbestos is used and also 'take-home' exposure of family members of asbestos exposed workers. Asbestos exposure may also be non-occupational, occurring as a consequence of using asbestos products in non-occupational contexts and passive exposure is also possible, such as exposure to asbestos products in the built environment or proximity to an environmental source of exposure, for example an asbestos production plant. The extremely long latency period for this disease makes exposure assessment problematic in the context of a mesothelioma registry. OccIDEAS, a recently developed online tool for retrospective exposure assessment, has been adapted for use in the Australian Mesothelioma Registry (AMR) to enable systematic retrospective exposure assessment of consenting cases. Twelve occupational questionnaire modules and one non-occupational module have been developed for the AMR, which form the basis of structured interviews using OccIDEAS, which also stores collected data and provides a framework for generating metrics of exposure.
Asbestos
;
Australia
;
Carcinogens
;
Environmental Exposure
;
Humans
;
Latency Period (Psychology)
;
Mesothelioma
;
Occupational Exposure
;
Plants
;
Surveys and Questionnaires
;
Retrospective Studies
9.Cohort studies on cancer mortality of digestive system among workers exposed to asbestos: a meta-analysis.
Tong-da SUN ; Jian-Er CHEN ; Xiu-Juan ZHANG ; Xiu-Yang LI
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases 2008;26(10):605-608
OBJECTIVETo determine if there are excessive risks of malignant tumors or not among workers exposed to asbestos by applying a meta-analysis technique.
METHODSAll data meeting the criteria of cohort studies on cancer mortality of digestive system among workers exposed to asbestos would be incorporated into the meta-analysis. The pooled standardized mortality ratios (SMR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for main cancer sites of digestive system were calculated by using two approaches of un-weighted ratio and random effects model. The heterogeneity and its sources of the results were examined with a Q-statistic and Z-score test.
RESULTS69 asbestos-exposed cohorts were summarized. The significantly elevated meta-SMR for all deaths (1.16), all cancers (1.42), cancer of digestive system (1.15) and cancer of stomach (1.20) among workers exposed to chrysotile alone or mixed asbestos were observed (P < 0.01). The stomach cancer SMR was significantly increased in the asbestos cement workers, the screening mine workers and the insulators, (1.27, 1.21 and 2.13 respectively) (P < 0.05). meta-SMR for cancers at other sites of digestive system including esophagus, colon, rectum and liver were not significant.
CONCLUSIONThere are likely excessive risks of cancer of stomach among workers exposed to asbestos. However, there is likely no convincing indication of an etiological association between asbestos exposure and cancers at other sites of digestive system.
Asbestos ; adverse effects ; Carcinogens, Environmental ; adverse effects ; Cohort Studies ; Digestive System Neoplasms ; chemically induced ; mortality ; Humans ; Occupational Exposure ; adverse effects
10.Impact of fine particles in ambient air on lung cancer.
Gerard HOEK ; Ole RAASCHOU-NIELSEN
Chinese Journal of Cancer 2014;33(4):197-203
Recently, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified outdoor air pollution and the particulate matter component of outdoor air pollution as class I carcinogen. Air pollution is consistently associated with lung cancer in epidemiologic and experimental studies. The IARC assessment is specifically designed as hazard identification, and it does not quantify the magnitude of the cancer risk. This article addresses the magnitude of the lung cancer risk in the population due to ambient air pollution exposure.
Air Pollutants
;
toxicity
;
Air Pollution
;
adverse effects
;
Carcinogens, Environmental
;
toxicity
;
Humans
;
Lung Neoplasms
;
etiology
;
Particulate Matter
;
toxicity
;
Risk Factors