Purpose: This study evaluates the knowledge of surgical residents in a tertiary hospital regarding the operational principles, potential complications, and mechanisms of energy devices used in surgery. Methods: A 16-question test was developed using educational materials in the “Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE)” program, prepared by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) for educational purposes, and from literature on energy devices. The test was shared online with surgical branch residents via Google Forms, and they were asked to complete it. Participants were given one week to complete the test and return the results online. Results: A total of 108 residents voluntarily participated in the study. The average number of correct answers was 6.5 out of 16. There was no significant difference between the correct answer rates for surgical branches. However, an increase in surgical seniority was associated with a higher number of correct answers (P < 0.001). Conclusion Theoretical education about energy devices in surgical training needs to be improved. Surgical residents reported insufficient knowledge regarding the devices’ operational principles and complication mechanisms.

Purpose: This study evaluates the knowledge of surgical residents in a tertiary hospital regarding the operational principles, potential complications, and mechanisms of energy devices used in surgery. Methods: A 16-question test was developed using educational materials in the “Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE)” program, prepared by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) for educational purposes, and from literature on energy devices. The test was shared online with surgical branch residents via Google Forms, and they were asked to complete it. Participants were given one week to complete the test and return the results online. Results: A total of 108 residents voluntarily participated in the study. The average number of correct answers was 6.5 out of 16. There was no significant difference between the correct answer rates for surgical branches. However, an increase in surgical seniority was associated with a higher number of correct answers (P < 0.001). Conclusion Theoretical education about energy devices in surgical training needs to be improved. Surgical residents reported insufficient knowledge regarding the devices’ operational principles and complication mechanisms.

Purpose: This study evaluates the knowledge of surgical residents in a tertiary hospital regarding the operational principles, potential complications, and mechanisms of energy devices used in surgery. Methods: A 16-question test was developed using educational materials in the “Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE)” program, prepared by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) for educational purposes, and from literature on energy devices. The test was shared online with surgical branch residents via Google Forms, and they were asked to complete it. Participants were given one week to complete the test and return the results online. Results: A total of 108 residents voluntarily participated in the study. The average number of correct answers was 6.5 out of 16. There was no significant difference between the correct answer rates for surgical branches. However, an increase in surgical seniority was associated with a higher number of correct answers (P < 0.001). Conclusion Theoretical education about energy devices in surgical training needs to be improved. Surgical residents reported insufficient knowledge regarding the devices’ operational principles and complication mechanisms.