OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODSFifteen patients (10 males and 5 females) aged from 32 to 58 years (median age of 47 years) with KPS>70 and the diagnosis of advanced NSCLC by pathology or cytology were treated with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) plus irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) by intravenous infusion on 1, 8, 15 days, and the treatment was repeated every 4 weeks. After treatment for at least 2 cycles, the therapeutic effects and adverse drug reactions were evaluated.

RESULTSOf all the cases, PR was achieved in 4 (26.7%), SD in 9 (60%), and PD in 2 (13.3%), with an overall response rate of 26.7%. The median survival time was 11 months and 1-year survival rate was 46.7% (7/15). The main toxicities were delayed diarrhea and granulocytopenia.

CONCLUSIONIrinotecan plus cisplatin is an effective and tolerable treatment for advanced NSCLC with low incidence of adverse effects.

Adult ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Camptothecin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; drug therapy ; Cisplatin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the short-term efficacy and toxicity of endostar in combination with XELIRI as the second-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODSTwenty-one patients with advanced colorectal cancer were treated with intravenous infusion of endostar (15 mg/day for 14 consecutive days) and irinotecan (250 mg/m(2), single dose on the first day), and oral administration of capecitabine (1.0 mg/m(2), twice daily for 14 days), and the treatment cycle was repeated every 21 days. The efficacy and toxicity of the treatments were evaluated according to RECIST and NCI-CTCAE3.0 standard, respectively.

RESULTSThe overall response rate was 9.5% in these patients, with a median time to progression (mTTP) of 3.9 months. The main adverse effects associated with the treatment included leucopenia, nausea/vomiting and peripheral neuritis.

CONCLUSIONEndostar combined with XELIRI is effective and safe as the second-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, and further clinical investigation is warranted.

Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Camptothecin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; Capecitabine ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; secondary ; Deoxycytidine ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; Endostatins ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; genetics ; Female ; Fluorouracil ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Recombinant Proteins ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects

We have evaluated the efficacy and safety of cetuximab plus FOLFIRI for irinotecan and oxaliplatin-refractory colorectal cancers. From September 2004 to February 2006, 31 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were treated with cetuximab (400 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] over 2 hr on day 1 followed by weekly 1-hr infusions of 250 mg/m2) plus bi-weekly FOLFIRI (irinotecan 150 mg/m2 IV over 90 min, and leucovorin 100 mg/m2 IV over 2 hr, followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, and followed by 5-FU 2,400 mg/m2 by continuous IV over 46 hrs). Patients received a median of four cycles (range: 1-23). Eight (25.8%) patients had confirmed partial responses and 10 (32.2%) had stable disease. After a median follow-up of 13.2 months for surviving patients, the median time to progression was 2.9 months, the median duration of response was 5.4 months, and the median overall survival was 10.9 months. Skin toxicity was observed in 25 patients (80.4%) including grade 3 in 6 patients (19.4%). Other common non-hematologic toxicities of all grades were mucositis (32.3%), asthenia (22.6%), diarrhea (12.9%), and paronychial cracking (12.9%). The combination of cetuximab with FOLFIRI was effective and tolerable in colorectal cancer patients heavily pretreated with a number of chemotherapy regimens.
Adult ; Aged ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Agents/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/*administration & dosage/adverse ; Camptothecin/administration & dosage/adverse effects/analogs & derivatives ; Colorectal Neoplasms/*drug therapy/secondary ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm ; Female ; Fluorouracil/administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Humans ; Leucovorin/administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Organoplatinum Compounds/pharmacology ; Prognosis ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors ; Safety

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan based FOLFIRI chemotherapy as a second-line treatment after failure of FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Fifty-two patients who were pathologically diagnosed with unresectable gastric cancer and received FOLFIRI chemotherapy after failure of FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy between September 2005 and February 2012 were enrolled in this study. Data were collected by retrospectively reviewing the medical records. The response to chemotherapy was assessed every 3 cycles by World Health Organization criteria and long term survival was analyzed. The toxicities were evaluated for every course of chemotherapy according to National Cancer Institution (NCI) toxicity criteria version 3.0. RESULTS: Median age of the patients was 57 years. Median overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were 7.8 and 5 months, respectively. The number of patients showing complete remission, partial remission, stable disease, and progressive disease were 0 (0.0%), 9 (17.3%), 30 (57.7%), and 13 (25.0%), respectively. The overall response rate was 17.3%. During a total of 345 cycles, anemia worse than NCI toxicity grade 3 occurred in 2.9%, leukopenia in 20.3%, neutropenia in 12.2%, and thrombocytopenia in 1.5%. Patients with less organ involvement by metastasis, less than 34 U/mL of CA 19-9 and good responsiveness to third cycle of second line chemotherapy were associated with longer OS and TTP. CONCLUSIONS: FOLFIRI chemotherapy has a modest efficacy with acceptable toxicities in patients with advanced gastric cancer as a second-line treatment. Further well-controlled studies are needed to elucidate the efficacy of FOLFIRI chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with advanced stomach cancer.
Adult ; Aged ; Anemia/etiology ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Camptothecin/adverse effects/*analogs & derivatives/therapeutic use ; Disease Progression ; Female ; Fluorouracil/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Leucovorin/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Organoplatinum Compounds/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms/*drug therapy/mortality/pathology ; Treatment Outcome

Agranulocytosis ; chemically induced ; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Camptothecin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; pathology ; Diarrhea ; chemically induced ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm ; Fluorouracil ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Leucovorin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Neoplasm Staging ; Survival Analysis

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Camptothecin ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; genetics ; Diarrhea ; chemically induced ; Glucuronosyltransferase ; genetics ; Humans ; Neutropenia ; chemically induced ; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

OBJECTIVETo explore the correlation between UGT1A1 (*28, *60 and * 93) polymorphism and the adverse reactions in small cell lung cancer patients after irinotecan chemotherapy.

METHODSClinical data of 58 small cell lung cancer patients in extensive stage treated in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Polymerase chain reaction was used to amplify the UTG, and direct sequencing was performed to determine the UGT polymorphism. The adverse reactions ≥ grade 3 after irinotecan chemotherapy in patients with different UGT genotype were analyzed.

RESULTSAmongthe 58 patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer, there were 45 (77.6%) cases of wild type UGT1A1*28, 40 (69.0%) cases of wild type UGT1A1* 93, 38 (65.5%) cases of wild type UGT1A1*60, 18 cases of mutation in UGT1A1* 93 and 20 cases of mutation in UGT1A1*60. In UGT1A1 promoter position 28, there were 8 (13.8%) cases of TA5 mutation and 5 (8.6%) cases of TA7 mutation. Among the patients with TA5 mutation, 5 cases had ≥ grade 3 diarrhea, 3 cases had ≥ grade 3 leucopenia and 3 cases had ≥ grade 3 neutropenia, while among the patients with UGT1A1 * 93 mutation, 7 cases had ≥ grade 3 diarrhea, 6 cases had ≥ grade 3 leucopenia and 4 cases had ≥ grade 3 neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONSTA5 and UGT1A1* 93 mutation increase the risk of diarrhea and ≥ grade 3 leukopenia and neutropenia, however, wild type UGT1A1 (*28, * 93, *60) and mutant UGT1A1*60 do not increase those risks. Further prospective study in a larger number of patients is needed to clarify the association between UGT1A1*28, UGT1A1* 93 and UGT1A1*60 polymorphism and adverse reactions of irinotecan, and to help clinicians in choosing a better therapeutic modality for personalized chemotherapy to improve curative effect and reduce adverse reactions.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic ; adverse effects ; Camptothecin ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; Diarrhea ; Genotype ; Glucuronosyltransferase ; genetics ; metabolism ; Humans ; Neutropenia ; Polymorphism, Genetic ; Promoter Regions, Genetic ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Small Cell Lung Carcinoma ; drug therapy ; genetics

Objective: To explore the efficacy of chemotherapy re-challenge in the third-line setting for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the real world. Methods: The clinicopathological data, treatment information, recent treatment efficacy, adverse events and survival data of mCRC patients who had disease progression after treatment with oxaliplatin-based and/or irinotecan-based chemotherapy and received third-line chemotherapy re-challenge from January 2013 to December 2020 at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were retrospectively collected. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the prognostic factors. Results: A total of 95 mCRC patients were included. Among them, 32 patients (33.7%) received chemotherapy alone and 63 patients (66.3%) received chemotherapy combined with targeted drugs. Eighty-three patients were treated with dual-drug chemotherapy (87.4%), including oxaliplatin re-challenge in 35 patients and irinotecan re-challenge in 48 patients. The remaining 12 patients were treated with triplet chemotherapy regimens (12.6%). Among them, as 5 patients had sequential application of oxaliplatin and irinotecan in front-line treatments, their third-line therapy re-challenged both oxaliplatin and irinotecan; 7 patients only had oxaliplatin prescription before, and these patients re-challenged oxaliplatin in the third-line treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) reached 8.6% (8/93) and 61.3% (57/93), respectively. The median progression free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 4.9 months and 13.0 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were leukopenia (34.7%) and neutropenia (34.7%), followed by gastrointestinal adverse reactions such as nausea (32.6%) and vomiting (31.6%). Grade 3-4 adverse events were mostly hematological toxicity. Cox multivariate analysis showed that gender (HR=1.609, 95% CI: 1.016-2.548) and the PFS of front-line treatments (HR=0.598, 95% CI: 0.378-0.947) were independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: The results suggested that it is safe and effective for mCRC patients to choose third-line chemotherapy re-challenge, especially for patients with a PFS of more than one year in front-line treatments.
Humans ; Irinotecan/therapeutic use* ; Oxaliplatin/therapeutic use* ; Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology* ; Retrospective Studies ; Fluorouracil ; Colonic Neoplasms/chemically induced* ; Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects* ; Camptothecin/adverse effects*

Objective: To explore the efficacy of chemotherapy re-challenge in the third-line setting for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the real world. Methods: The clinicopathological data, treatment information, recent treatment efficacy, adverse events and survival data of mCRC patients who had disease progression after treatment with oxaliplatin-based and/or irinotecan-based chemotherapy and received third-line chemotherapy re-challenge from January 2013 to December 2020 at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were retrospectively collected. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the prognostic factors. Results: A total of 95 mCRC patients were included. Among them, 32 patients (33.7%) received chemotherapy alone and 63 patients (66.3%) received chemotherapy combined with targeted drugs. Eighty-three patients were treated with dual-drug chemotherapy (87.4%), including oxaliplatin re-challenge in 35 patients and irinotecan re-challenge in 48 patients. The remaining 12 patients were treated with triplet chemotherapy regimens (12.6%). Among them, as 5 patients had sequential application of oxaliplatin and irinotecan in front-line treatments, their third-line therapy re-challenged both oxaliplatin and irinotecan; 7 patients only had oxaliplatin prescription before, and these patients re-challenged oxaliplatin in the third-line treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) reached 8.6% (8/93) and 61.3% (57/93), respectively. The median progression free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 4.9 months and 13.0 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were leukopenia (34.7%) and neutropenia (34.7%), followed by gastrointestinal adverse reactions such as nausea (32.6%) and vomiting (31.6%). Grade 3-4 adverse events were mostly hematological toxicity. Cox multivariate analysis showed that gender (HR=1.609, 95% CI: 1.016-2.548) and the PFS of front-line treatments (HR=0.598, 95% CI: 0.378-0.947) were independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: The results suggested that it is safe and effective for mCRC patients to choose third-line chemotherapy re-challenge, especially for patients with a PFS of more than one year in front-line treatments.
Humans ; Irinotecan/therapeutic use* ; Oxaliplatin/therapeutic use* ; Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology* ; Retrospective Studies ; Fluorouracil ; Colonic Neoplasms/chemically induced* ; Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects* ; Camptothecin/adverse effects*

OBJECTIVETo explore the effect of Shengjiang Xiexin Decoction (SXD) on the intestinal mucosal and functional cells of rats after irinotecan (CPT-11) chemotherapy.

METHODSTotally 24 healthy Sprague-Dawley (SD) male rats were divided into three groups, the normal control group, the CPT-11 group, the SXD combined CPT-11 group according to random digit table, 8 in each group. CPT-11 was injected at the daily dose of 150 mg/kg to rats in the CPT-11 group and the SXD combined CPT-11 group from the caudal vein on the 4th day, once daily for 2 successive days to duplicate delayed diarrhea model. Equal volume of normal saline was injected to rats in the normal control group from the caudal vein. SXD at 2 g/mL (10 g/kg body weight) was administered to rats in the SXD combined CPT-11 group by gastrogavage for 9 successive days. Deionized water was administered to rats in the CPT-11 group and the normal control group. Diarrhea was observed at 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, and 108 h to calculate the incidence rate of diarrhea. Meanwhile, scoring for diarrhea was performed by referring methods of Akinobu Kurita. Rats were killed on day 10, ileum, cecum, and colon tissues were collected and fixed in 10% formalin solution. HE staining was performed. Intestinal mucosa injuries were graded under light microscope according to the criterion of Chiu's score. The expressions of goblet cells and Paneth cells were observed by PAS stain. Enteroendocrine cells were observed by immunohistochemical CgA staining. Positive cells were counted and cumulative optical density (IOD) analyzed by Image-Pro-Plus 6.0.

RESULTSNo diarrhea occurred in rats of the normal control group at each time point. The incidence rate of diarrhea was 75.0% (6/8) at 48 h, 100.0% (8/8) at 60 h, 100.0% (8/8) at 72 h, 87.5% (7/8) at 84 h, 75.0% (6/8) at 96 h, and 75.0% (6/8) at 108 h in the CPT-11 group. The incidence rate of diarrhea was 25.0% (2/8) at 48 h, 50.0% (4/8) at 60 h, 12.5% (1/8) at 72 h, 0.0% (0/8) at 84 h in the SXD combined CPT-11 group. Compared with the same group at 60 h, scores for diarrhea at 48, 84, 96, and 108 h obviously decreased in the CPT-11 group, and scores for diarrhea at 48, 72, 84, 96, and 108 h obviously decreased in the SXD combined CPT-11 group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). Compared with the same group at 72 h, scores for diarrhea at 84, 96, and 108 h obviously decreased in the CPT-11 group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). Compared with the normal control group, scores for diarrhea increased in the CPT-11 group at each time point (P < 0.01); grading of ileum, cecum, and colon mucosal tissues increased (P < 0.05, P < 0.01); expressions of ileum and cecum mucosal epithelial goblet cells obviously decreased (P < 0.05); the number and expressions of ileum and cecum mucosal epithelial Paneth cells increased (P < 0.01). Expressions of ilium endocrine cells increased, while those of cecum and colon endocrine cells decreased in the CPT-11 group (P < 0.01). Compared with the CPT-11 group, scores for diarrhea were obviously lowered (P < 0.05, P < 0.01), grading of ileum, and cecum mucosal tissues decreased (P < 0.05, P < 0.01); expressions of ileum, cecum, and colon mucosal epithelial goblet cells obviously increased (P < 0.05, P < 0.01); the number and expressions of ileum cecum mucosal epithelial Paneth cells increased (P < 0.05); expressions of cecum and colon endocrine cells increased (P < 0.05, P < 0.01) in the SXD combined CPT-11 group.

CONCLUSIONSXD played roles in preventing and treating CPT-11 induced delayed diarrhea by improving CPT-11 chemotherapy induced apoptosis and necrosis of intestinal mucosal and functional cells.

Animals ; Apoptosis ; Camptothecin ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; Colon ; Diarrhea ; Drug Therapy ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Ileum ; Intestinal Mucosa ; drug effects ; Male ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Wound Healing ; drug effects