Humans ; Pandemics ; COVID-19/epidemiology*

Aims: During the Covid-19 pandemic, adaptation, flexibility and creativity is paramount in conducting Service-Learning courses. The study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a hybrid mode service-learning in Microbiology course conducted over a semester which involved undergraduate students being strewn all over the country, with highly diversified conditions varying from local movement control laws and availability of facilities such as internet access. Methodology and results: A cohort of undergraduate students conducted the course from the comfort of their own homes to teach underprivileged school students. The undergraduate students engaged school students in the proximity of their location, then conducted STEM activities over the course of a few weeks either via face-to-face, online or hybrid mode. Microbiology activities included microscopy using a Foldscope (paper microscope), isolation and growth of microbes, preparation of microbe-related food and others. Surveys were conducted with school students pre- and postprogramme, parents and the undergraduate students conducting the programme. While the school students benefitted from highly engaging STEM modules, the undergraduate students underwent a steep learning curve, mentoring school students in STEM whilst juggling challenges presented by the pandemic but finally achieved all learning outcomes. Conclusion, significance and impact of study Service-learning for life sciences subjects can be conducted efficiently during a pandemic when flexibility and freedom is given to students to achieve the learning outcomes.
Microbiological Phenomena ; COVID-19--epidemiology

Humans ; COVID-19 ; China/epidemiology*

ABSTRACT Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) which caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2) is the prevailing global health issue at this time, spreading rapidly despite various containment efforts. It is first reported in Wuhan, China in December 2019 and the total number of cases has reached 7,064,230 with 404,585 total deaths globally to date (June 7, 2020). SARS-CoV-2 is reported closely related to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, the virus causes only mild symptoms in the majority of cases. However, it can progress to pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), eventually leading to multiple organ dysfunction, the major cause of mortality among affected patients. The primary modes of transmission include droplet and contact infection, and possibly respiratory aerosols in settings where aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) occur. Diagnosis mainly relies on detecting the viral RNA in nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal specimens, combined with imaging techniques such as chest X-ray and computerized tomography (CT) scan. Currently, no empirical therapy or vaccine is available yet for the virus, and supportive measures remain the mainstay of treatment. Information about the virus is being updated every day. This review article summarizes the current knowledge surrounding the outbreak, including epidemiology, virological facts, pathogenesis, clinical findings, diagnostic criteria, and currently available therapeutics and vaccines, with a special emphasis on Middle Eastern countries including Saudi Arabia.
SARS-CoV-2 ; COVID-19--epidemiology

Humans ; COVID-19 ; Vaccination ; Neoplasms/epidemiology*

Autoantibodies ; COVID-19 ; Humans ; Singapore/epidemiology*

Background and Objective: Pediatric COVID-19 epidemiology and factors associated with adverse outcomes-mortality, need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission, are largely unstudied. We described the clinicodemographic characteristics of Filipino pediatric COVID-19 patients and determined the factors associated with adverse outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 180 hospitalized SARS-CoV-2-confirmed cases 0-18 years old from April 2020 to August 2021 in a tertiary COVID-19 referral hospital in Manila, National Capital Region. Crude associations were determined using chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests; and medians were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Factors predictive of mortality were determined using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. The survivor functions were depicted in graphs. Results: About 41.67% had mild disease, 58.33% were males, 39.4% aged 0-4 years, and 69.44% had at least one comorbidity. About 9.44% died (adjusted 9.2 persons per 1000 patient-days, 95% CI 5.5%-15.2%), 17.78% needed invasive mechanical ventilation, and 20% needed ICU admission. Independently, severe-critical COVID-19 (HRc 11.51, 95% CI 3.23, 41.06), retractions (HRc 10.30, 95% CI 3.27, 32.47), alar flaring (HRc 4.39, 95% CI 1.53, 12.58), cyanosis (HRc 4.39, 95% CI 1.72, 14.11), difficulty of breathing (HRc 7.99, 95% CI 2.25, 28.71), poor suck/appetite (HRc 4.46, 95% CI 1.59, 12.40), ferritin (HRc 1.01, 95% CI 1.00, 1.01), IL-6 (HRc 1.01, 95% CI 1.00, 1.01), aPTT (HRc 1.05, 95% CI 1.01, 1.10), IVIg (HRc 4.00, 95% CI 1.07, 14.92) and corticosteroid (HRc 6.01, 95% CI 2.04, 17.67) were significant hazards for mortality. In adjusted Cox analysis, only retractions (HRa 34.96, 95% CI 3.36, 363.79), seizure (HRa 9.98, 95% CI 1.76, 56.55), and corticosteroids (HRa 8.21, 95% CI 1.12, 60.38) were significantly associated with mortality while alar flaring appeared to be protective (HRa 0.10, 95% CI 0.01, 0.95). Several clinical characteristics were consistently associated with adverse outcomes. Conclusions Majority of hospitalized pediatric COVID-19 patients were very young, males, had mild disease, and had at least one comorbidity. Mortality, invasive mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission were relatively low. Except for alar flaring which appeared to be protective, retractions, seizure, and use of corticosteroids were associated with adverse outcomes.
COVID-19 ; Epidemiology ; Philippines ; Child ; Pediatrics

Humans ; COVID-19/epidemiology* ; Education, Medical

Humans ; Hong Kong/epidemiology* ; COVID-19

Background: While wearing face shields and other gears to protect the facial mucous membranes not covered by face masks are proven to decrease the odds of infection in the hospital setting, there is no concrete evidence of its efficacy in the general public. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of face shield use in the general public in the local setting. Methods: This study utilized an ecological study design, with the weeks when the policy was implemented serving as the exposure variable while the weeks when the policy was not in effect, whether prior to or after, serving as control. Primary outcomes were mean incidence of COVID-19 and case fatality rate (CFR) per week. Results: When the mandatory face shield use was implemented, the mean incidence of COVID-19 per week was higher compared to weeks when it was not implemented [93 cases per 1000 population per week (ptpw) vs 65 cases, relative risk:1.43, z=-3.79, p=0.0001]. Moreover, during weeks when only less than 50% of the population was vaccinated with first dose (93 cases ptpw vs 52 cases, RR: 1.79, z=-4.3, p<0.0001) and complete doses (93 cases ptpw vs 66 cases ptpw, RR:1.41, z=-3.69, p=0.0002), the mean incidence of COVID-19 per week were statistically higher in weeks when face shield use was in effect. Controlling the status of vaccination and the predominant strain, face shield use increased the incidence of COVID-19 cases ptpw by 38 (F=13, R2=39%, p=0.026) to 50 (F=3.06, R2=12.2%, p=0.032) compared to no face shield use. No difference in CFR between weeks with face shield use and no face shield use was seen (29 deaths ptpw vs 32 deaths per ptpw, p=1.0). Nevertheless, when the weeks with no vaccination (27 deaths ptpw vs 48 deaths ptpw, RR=0.56, p=0.0018), less than 50% of the population were vaccinated with f irst dose (30 deaths ptpw vs 50 deaths ptpw, RR:0.6, p=0.0005), and complete doses (30 deaths vs 47 deaths ptpw, RR:0.64, p=0.0042) were only considered, face shield use significantly decreased the mean CFR per week. Controlling the incidence rate of COVID-19, vaccination status, and prevalent strain, face shield use decreases the number of deaths by 26 per 1000 COVID-19 diagnosed cases (F=7.4, R2=28.3, p=0.010). Conclusions In general, although face shield use increased susceptibility to COVID-19, it decreased case fatality rate in the Philippines. However, a more robust and controlled study in the future may be needed to truly justify its recommendation for the public.
COVID-19 ; epidemiology ; public health ; Philippines