1.Small - incision technique for Med-EI combi 40+⢠implantation
Charlotte M Chiong ; Maribel B Mueller ; Erwin Voltaire M Ungui MClinAud
Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2006;21(1-2):39-41
Objectives: 1) To present a technique for implanting the Med-EI Combi 40+⢠using a small incision with minimal access. 2) To describe the short term postsurgical outcomes in these patients. Methods: Two patients (1 child and 1 adult) underwent a novel small incision technique for implantation of the Med-EI Combi 40+⢠cochlear implant device. The short term outcomes in these two patients were described and compared with previous experience using the standard implantation technique citing advantages and possible limitations. As these two patients had bilateral implantation utilizing different techniques on the two sides interesting comparisons could be made on the same individuals. Results: The preliminary experience with a novel small incision technique for the Med-EI Combi 40+⢠implantation shows encouraging results in terms of healing and initial performance of these patients. Conclusion: This small incision technique may be offered to patients especially to those who wish to have bilateral implantations as this allows a less invasive approach, good cosmesis without sacrificing the safety and performance outcomes at least in the short term. (Author)
COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION SURGERY OTOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES
2.Cochlear implantation with pericanal electrode insertion technique.
Tingting CUI ; Hong JIANG ; Xiaowei CHEN ; Guodong FENG ; Zhiyong ZHANG ; Fengrong LI ; Cuixia ZHAO ; Zhiqiang GAO ; Dongyi HAN ; Shiming YANG ; Pu DAI ; Jianan LI ; Xin XI ; Xiulan MA ; Yaodong DONG ; Ping YU
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2011;25(10):457-459
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the surgical technique of the pericanal electrode insertion technique for ies cochlear implantation.
METHOD:
Forty cases of sensorineural deafness were subjected to the ies cochlear implants. Cochleostomy was performed through the external auditory canal with a microdrill anterior to the round window. The electrode impedance and electrically auditory brainstem responses(EABR) were tested during the operation. The X-ray photographs were taken after the operation. The cochlear implant was activated in all 40 cases 4 weeks following surgery.
RESULT:
All of the electrodes were inserted and all of the implants worked well. No electrode extrusions or serious surgical complications happened during postoperative observation for 6 months.
CONCLUSION
The pericanal electrode insertion technique is a safe approach for ies cochlear implantation.
Child, Preschool
;
Cochlear Implantation
;
methods
;
Cochlear Implants
;
Ear Canal
;
surgery
;
Female
;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
;
surgery
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Male
;
Otologic Surgical Procedures
;
methods
;
Subcutaneous Tissue
;
surgery