OBJECTIVE: To compare the advantages and disadvantages between total vaginal hysterectomy (VTH) and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) including the indications and safety. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent VTH from July 1998 to December 1999 and those who underwent LAVH from January 2000 to April 2002. We evaluated age, parity, previous abdominal operations, indications for hysterectomy, combined operations, operation time, bleeding amount, hemoglobin change, weight of uterus, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: 1. Age was not a notable factor but parity was significantly lower in LAVH group. 2. In VTH group, 48% of patients had previous operations compared with 46% in LAVH group. 3. The most common indication for hysterectomy of both group was uterine myoma. 4. The weight of hysterectomized specimen was 256 g in VTH group and 237 g in LAVH group. 5. In VTH group, 38% received concurrent surgical procedures of which colporrhaphy was the most common (14 cases). In LAVH group, 72.5% received concurrent surgical procedures of which salpingoo- phorectomy was most common. 6. The operation time showed a notable difference; 78.6 min. in VTH group and 105.4 min. in LAVH. 7. There was no significant difference in bleeding amount and hemoglobin change. 8. Postoperative complication was higher in VTH group (14%) than LAVH group (7.5%). However all the patients recovered with conservative treatment and close observation. CONCLUSION: Both VTH and LAVH had the following advantages compared with abdominal hysterectomy: less pain, shorter hospital stay, cosmetic advantages, lower prevalence. In this study we found out that in VTH, the procedure could be done safely even if the uterus was big or with previous abdominal operations. Limited operation field and the fact that we couldn't check the abdominal cavity were some disadvantages. In comparison, LAVH offered a view of the abdominal cavity which make easy adnexal operation but because of expensive operative tools, cost was a problem. In order to satisfy the patient and lower the cost, appropriate study on the indications and training on procedures will be necessary.
Abdominal Cavity ; Bleeding Time ; Female ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Hysterectomy, Vaginal ; Leiomyoma ; Length of Stay ; Medical Records ; Parity ; Postoperative Complications ; Prevalence ; Uterine Prolapse* ; Uterus

BACKGROUND: Avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been known to reduce early mortality and morbidity. Diabetes Mellitus is a significant risk factor for adverse early and late outcomes after CABG. We compared the clinical results of off-pump CABG versus on-pump CABG in diabetes patients. MATERIAL AND METHOD: 682 patients (424 off-pump CABG and 258 on-pump CABG) underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between January 2001 and June 2003. Data were collected 242 patient who had diabetes. Among them, 154 patients underwent off-pump CABG and 90 patients underwent on-pump CABG. We analyzed the preoperative risk factors and postoperative results between 2 groups. RESULT: Two groups did not show statistical differences in age, sex, coronary and operative risk factors. Operative time was significantly shorter in off-pump CABG, however, number of grafts was fewer in off-pump CABG. Postoperative inotropic usage was lower in off-pump CABG. Postoperative CK-MB level was lower in off-pump CABG, and ICU stay and ventilation time was significantly shorter in off-pump CABG. However, there was no statistical difference between 2 groups in operative mortality, reoperation rate, perioperative myocardial infarction, wound infection, renal failure, neurological complications and hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Off-pump CABG group showed less myocardial damage and early recovery. We concluded that off-pump CABG is the more reasonable technique in diabetes patients although two techniques showed good results. The long-term follow up and prospective study may be warranted.
Cardiopulmonary Bypass ; Coronary Artery Bypass* ; Coronary Vessels* ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Mortality ; Myocardial Infarction ; Operative Time ; Renal Insufficiency ; Reoperation ; Risk Factors ; Transplants ; Ventilation ; Wound Infection

OBJECTIVES: The Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology and the Korean Academy of Schizophrenia developed the Korean algorithm project for schizophrenia to aid clinical decisions. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of Korean Medication Algorithm for Schizophrenia patients in clinical settings in Korea. METHODS: A total of 108 schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder patients were enrolled at 19 centers and treated according to the algorithm. PANSS (Positive and Negative Symptom Scale) and CGI (Clinical Global Impression) were used to evaluate symptom severity. Also UKU (UKU side effect rating scale) and LUNSERS (Liverpool University Neuroleptic Side Effect Rating Scale), DAI-10 (Drug Attitude Inventory-10), PPS (Patient Preference Scale), SWN (Subjective Well-Being under Neuroleptic treatment) and WHOQOL (World Health Organization Quality of Life) were used to evaluate tolerability and satisfaction of patient respectively. RESULTS: Overall ratings including symptom severity, compliance of medication, side effect of medication, quality of life were favorable. The treatment response (PANSS improvement > or = 20%) rate was 63%, 75% at the first Clinical decision point (CDP) and 4 month respectively. CONCLUSION: Symptom improvement, tolerability and quality of life were all favorable. These results suggest that this algorithm can be useful in clinical practices.
Compliance ; Humans ; Korea ; Psychotic Disorders ; Quality of Life ; Schizophrenia ; World Health Organization