Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Background: Long-term use of bisphosphonate is a risk factor for atypical femoral fractures (AFFs). Femoral bowing is known to be associated with AFFs. However, whether femoral bowing quickens the occurrence of AFF is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether AFF occurs earlier in patients with severe femoral bowing than in those without severe bowing. Methods: One hundred and sixty-four patients (186 AFFs) from January 2006 to December 2022 were included in this study.According to severity of femoral bowing, patients were divided into 2 groups: severe bowing group (26 femurs) and minimal to moderate bowing group (160 femurs). Age, sex, and completeness and location of AFF were compared between the 2 groups. We compared the time of AFF occurrence after bisphosphonate therapy using cumulative percentage between the 2 groups. Results: Age and sex were similar between the 2 groups, while body mass index (BMI) was lower (22.5 ± 3.0 kg/m 2 vs. 24.5 ± 3.5 kg/m 2 , p = 0.003) in the severe bowing group. The duration of bisphosphonate use was shorter in the severe bowing group than in the minimal to moderate bowing group (3.3 ± 3.8 years vs. 5.0 ± 4.0 years, p = 0.048). In the severe bowing group, 85% of AFFs were diaphyseal in contrast to the 46% in the minimal to moderate bowing group (p < 0.001). Cumulative percentage plot of AFFs in the severe bowing group was left-shifted compared to the minimal to moderate bowing group. Conclusions At the time of AFF diagnosis, the severe bowing group exhibited shorter duration of bisphosphonate use, lower BMI, and a higher incidence of diaphyseal location. Shortening the duration of bisphosphonate therapy may be advisable in patients with severe femoral bowing.

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze whether the occurrence of complications increases if radiotherapy (RT) is administered after breast reconstructive surgery using implants. Methods: This retrospective study included 80 patients who underwent breast reconstruction using implants, of which 16 (20.0%) underwent RT. Most patients underwent conventional fractionated RT (n = 13), and hypofractionated RT was performed in 3 patients. Most patients (n = 51, 63.8%) underwent delayed reconstruction, which involved implant replacement after tissue expander insertion. Only 29 patients (36.3%) underwent immediate reconstruction simultaneously with breast cancer surgery. Results: The median postoperative follow-up was 39.9 months (range, 8.7–120.3 months). Complications occurred in 18 (22.5%); infectionecrosis (n = 8), leakage/rupture (n = 8), and capsular contracture (n = 2). Infectionecrosis is common in patients undergoing RT. Complications occurred in 4 patients (25.0%) who received RT and 14 (21.9%) who did not receive RT, and complications did not significantly increase with RT (P = 0.511). There was no overall difference in complications between the immediate (4 of 29) and delayed (14 of 51) reconstruction groups (P = 0.129). Nine patients underwent reoperation because of complications; 3 (18.8%) received RT and 6 (9.4%) did not receive RT. The reoperation rate did not increase significantly with RT (P = 0.254). There were 3 cases of recurrence, and patients who received RT had no recurrence. Conclusion RT did not significantly increase the complication or reoperation rates if reconstructive surgery was performed using implants. Therefore, RT should be performed in patients at a high risk of recurrence.

Background: Long-term use of bisphosphonate is a risk factor for atypical femoral fractures (AFFs). Femoral bowing is known to be associated with AFFs. However, whether femoral bowing quickens the occurrence of AFF is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether AFF occurs earlier in patients with severe femoral bowing than in those without severe bowing. Methods: One hundred and sixty-four patients (186 AFFs) from January 2006 to December 2022 were included in this study.According to severity of femoral bowing, patients were divided into 2 groups: severe bowing group (26 femurs) and minimal to moderate bowing group (160 femurs). Age, sex, and completeness and location of AFF were compared between the 2 groups. We compared the time of AFF occurrence after bisphosphonate therapy using cumulative percentage between the 2 groups. Results: Age and sex were similar between the 2 groups, while body mass index (BMI) was lower (22.5 ± 3.0 kg/m 2 vs. 24.5 ± 3.5 kg/m 2 , p = 0.003) in the severe bowing group. The duration of bisphosphonate use was shorter in the severe bowing group than in the minimal to moderate bowing group (3.3 ± 3.8 years vs. 5.0 ± 4.0 years, p = 0.048). In the severe bowing group, 85% of AFFs were diaphyseal in contrast to the 46% in the minimal to moderate bowing group (p < 0.001). Cumulative percentage plot of AFFs in the severe bowing group was left-shifted compared to the minimal to moderate bowing group. Conclusions At the time of AFF diagnosis, the severe bowing group exhibited shorter duration of bisphosphonate use, lower BMI, and a higher incidence of diaphyseal location. Shortening the duration of bisphosphonate therapy may be advisable in patients with severe femoral bowing.

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze whether the occurrence of complications increases if radiotherapy (RT) is administered after breast reconstructive surgery using implants. Methods: This retrospective study included 80 patients who underwent breast reconstruction using implants, of which 16 (20.0%) underwent RT. Most patients underwent conventional fractionated RT (n = 13), and hypofractionated RT was performed in 3 patients. Most patients (n = 51, 63.8%) underwent delayed reconstruction, which involved implant replacement after tissue expander insertion. Only 29 patients (36.3%) underwent immediate reconstruction simultaneously with breast cancer surgery. Results: The median postoperative follow-up was 39.9 months (range, 8.7–120.3 months). Complications occurred in 18 (22.5%); infectionecrosis (n = 8), leakage/rupture (n = 8), and capsular contracture (n = 2). Infectionecrosis is common in patients undergoing RT. Complications occurred in 4 patients (25.0%) who received RT and 14 (21.9%) who did not receive RT, and complications did not significantly increase with RT (P = 0.511). There was no overall difference in complications between the immediate (4 of 29) and delayed (14 of 51) reconstruction groups (P = 0.129). Nine patients underwent reoperation because of complications; 3 (18.8%) received RT and 6 (9.4%) did not receive RT. The reoperation rate did not increase significantly with RT (P = 0.254). There were 3 cases of recurrence, and patients who received RT had no recurrence. Conclusion RT did not significantly increase the complication or reoperation rates if reconstructive surgery was performed using implants. Therefore, RT should be performed in patients at a high risk of recurrence.

Background: Long-term use of bisphosphonate is a risk factor for atypical femoral fractures (AFFs). Femoral bowing is known to be associated with AFFs. However, whether femoral bowing quickens the occurrence of AFF is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether AFF occurs earlier in patients with severe femoral bowing than in those without severe bowing. Methods: One hundred and sixty-four patients (186 AFFs) from January 2006 to December 2022 were included in this study.According to severity of femoral bowing, patients were divided into 2 groups: severe bowing group (26 femurs) and minimal to moderate bowing group (160 femurs). Age, sex, and completeness and location of AFF were compared between the 2 groups. We compared the time of AFF occurrence after bisphosphonate therapy using cumulative percentage between the 2 groups. Results: Age and sex were similar between the 2 groups, while body mass index (BMI) was lower (22.5 ± 3.0 kg/m 2 vs. 24.5 ± 3.5 kg/m 2 , p = 0.003) in the severe bowing group. The duration of bisphosphonate use was shorter in the severe bowing group than in the minimal to moderate bowing group (3.3 ± 3.8 years vs. 5.0 ± 4.0 years, p = 0.048). In the severe bowing group, 85% of AFFs were diaphyseal in contrast to the 46% in the minimal to moderate bowing group (p < 0.001). Cumulative percentage plot of AFFs in the severe bowing group was left-shifted compared to the minimal to moderate bowing group. Conclusions At the time of AFF diagnosis, the severe bowing group exhibited shorter duration of bisphosphonate use, lower BMI, and a higher incidence of diaphyseal location. Shortening the duration of bisphosphonate therapy may be advisable in patients with severe femoral bowing.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze whether the occurrence of complications increases if radiotherapy (RT) is administered after breast reconstructive surgery using implants. Methods: This retrospective study included 80 patients who underwent breast reconstruction using implants, of which 16 (20.0%) underwent RT. Most patients underwent conventional fractionated RT (n = 13), and hypofractionated RT was performed in 3 patients. Most patients (n = 51, 63.8%) underwent delayed reconstruction, which involved implant replacement after tissue expander insertion. Only 29 patients (36.3%) underwent immediate reconstruction simultaneously with breast cancer surgery. Results: The median postoperative follow-up was 39.9 months (range, 8.7–120.3 months). Complications occurred in 18 (22.5%); infectionecrosis (n = 8), leakage/rupture (n = 8), and capsular contracture (n = 2). Infectionecrosis is common in patients undergoing RT. Complications occurred in 4 patients (25.0%) who received RT and 14 (21.9%) who did not receive RT, and complications did not significantly increase with RT (P = 0.511). There was no overall difference in complications between the immediate (4 of 29) and delayed (14 of 51) reconstruction groups (P = 0.129). Nine patients underwent reoperation because of complications; 3 (18.8%) received RT and 6 (9.4%) did not receive RT. The reoperation rate did not increase significantly with RT (P = 0.254). There were 3 cases of recurrence, and patients who received RT had no recurrence. Conclusion RT did not significantly increase the complication or reoperation rates if reconstructive surgery was performed using implants. Therefore, RT should be performed in patients at a high risk of recurrence.

Background: Long-term use of bisphosphonate is a risk factor for atypical femoral fractures (AFFs). Femoral bowing is known to be associated with AFFs. However, whether femoral bowing quickens the occurrence of AFF is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether AFF occurs earlier in patients with severe femoral bowing than in those without severe bowing. Methods: One hundred and sixty-four patients (186 AFFs) from January 2006 to December 2022 were included in this study.According to severity of femoral bowing, patients were divided into 2 groups: severe bowing group (26 femurs) and minimal to moderate bowing group (160 femurs). Age, sex, and completeness and location of AFF were compared between the 2 groups. We compared the time of AFF occurrence after bisphosphonate therapy using cumulative percentage between the 2 groups. Results: Age and sex were similar between the 2 groups, while body mass index (BMI) was lower (22.5 ± 3.0 kg/m 2 vs. 24.5 ± 3.5 kg/m 2 , p = 0.003) in the severe bowing group. The duration of bisphosphonate use was shorter in the severe bowing group than in the minimal to moderate bowing group (3.3 ± 3.8 years vs. 5.0 ± 4.0 years, p = 0.048). In the severe bowing group, 85% of AFFs were diaphyseal in contrast to the 46% in the minimal to moderate bowing group (p < 0.001). Cumulative percentage plot of AFFs in the severe bowing group was left-shifted compared to the minimal to moderate bowing group. Conclusions At the time of AFF diagnosis, the severe bowing group exhibited shorter duration of bisphosphonate use, lower BMI, and a higher incidence of diaphyseal location. Shortening the duration of bisphosphonate therapy may be advisable in patients with severe femoral bowing.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area.Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version.Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.