1.A Case of Primary Omental Torsion Presenting as an Acute Abdominal Pain.
Jai Hoon YOON ; Yoon Kyung PARK ; Byong Kwan SOHN ; Yong Chul JEON ; Joo Hyun SOHN ; Dong Soo HAN
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2007;49(1):41-44
Torsion of greater omentum is a rare cause of acute abdomen. However, it should be included in the differential diagnoses in addition to acute cholecystitis, acute appendicitis, cecal diverticulitis, and other variable causes of acute abdomen. Diagnosis is usually made at laparotomy for suspected appendicitis. In some cases, computed tomography demonstrates a successful preoperative detection of omental torsion. We report a case of surgically and pathologically proven torsion with subsequent infarction of greater omentum presented as an acute abdominal pain.
Abdomen, Acute/*diagnosis
;
Adult
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Humans
;
Infarction/diagnosis
;
Male
;
*Omentum/blood supply/surgery
;
Peritoneal Diseases/*diagnosis/surgery
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
;
Torsion Abnormality/*diagnosis/surgery
2.Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016.
Deog Young KIM ; Yun Hee KIM ; Jongmin LEE ; Won Hyuk CHANG ; Min Wook KIM ; Sung Bom PYUN ; Woo Kyoung YOO ; Suk Hoon OHN ; Ki Deok PARK ; Byung Mo OH ; Seong Hoon LIM ; Kang Jae JUNG ; Byung Ju RYU ; Sun IM ; Sung Ju JEE ; Han Gil SEO ; Ueon Woo RAH ; Joo Hyun PARK ; Min Kyun SOHN ; Min Ho CHUN ; Hee Suk SHIN ; Seong Jae LEE ; Yang Soo LEE ; Si Woon PARK ; Yoon Ghil PARK ; Nam Jong PAIK ; Sam Gyu LEE ; Ju Kang LEE ; Seong Eun KOH ; Don Kyu KIM ; Geun Young PARK ; Yong Il SHIN ; Myoung Hwan KO ; Yong Wook KIM ; Seung Don YOO ; Eun Joo KIM ; Min Kyun OH ; Jae Hyeok CHANG ; Se Hee JUNG ; Tae Woo KIM ; Won Seok KIM ; Dae Hyun KIM ; Tai Hwan PARK ; Kwan Sung LEE ; Byong Yong HWANG ; Young Jin SONG
Brain & Neurorehabilitation 2017;10(Suppl 1):e11-
“Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016” is the 3rd edition of clinical practice guideline (CPG) for stroke rehabilitation in Korea, which updates the 2nd edition published in 2014. Forty-two specialists in stroke rehabilitation from 21 universities and 4 rehabilitation hospitals and 4 consultants participated in this update. The purpose of this CPG is to provide optimum practical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation teams to make a decision when they manage stroke patients and ultimately, to help stroke patients obtain maximal functional recovery and return to the society. The recent two CPGs from Canada (2015) and USA (2016) and articles that were published following the 2nd edition were used to develop this 3rd edition of CPG for stroke rehabilitation in Korea. The chosen articles' level of evidence and grade of recommendation were decided by the criteria of Scotland (2010) and the formal consensus was derived by the nominal group technique. The levels of evidence range from 1++ to 4 and the grades of recommendation range from A to D. Good Practice Point was recommended as best practice based on the clinical experience of the guideline developmental group. The draft of the developed CPG was reviewed by the experts group in the public hearings and then revised. “Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016” consists of ‘Chapter 1; Introduction of Stroke Rehabilitation’, ‘Chapter 2; Rehabilitation for Stroke Syndrome, ‘Chapter 3; Rehabilitation for Returning to the Society’, and ‘Chapter 4; Advanced Technique for Stroke Rehabilitation’. “Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016” will provide direction and standardization for acute, subacute and chronic stroke rehabilitation in Korea.
Canada
;
Consensus
;
Consultants
;
Humans
;
Korea*
;
Practice Guidelines as Topic
;
Rehabilitation*
;
Scotland
;
Specialization
;
Stroke*