1.Incidence of and Risk Factors for Bundle Branch Block in Adults older than 40 years.
Joon Hoon JEONG ; June Hong KIM ; Yong Hyun PARK ; Dong Cheul HAN ; Ki Won HWANG ; Dong Won LEE ; Jun Hyok OH ; Sung Gook SONG ; Jeong Su KIM ; Kook Jin CHUN ; Taek Jong HONG ; Yung Woo SHIN
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2004;19(3):171-178
BACKGROUND: In the general population, the incidence of bundle branch block (BBB) is relatively low, and its effects on long-term prognosis have not been established. Previous studies on the incidence and correlation of BBB to clinical factors have produced conflicting results. However, the incidence of BBB was strongly related to age. This study aimed to describe the incidence of and risk factors for BBB in Korea. METHODS: In this study, 14, 540 adults (male 6, 573/female 7, 967) > or=40 years old received screening tests for general health between April and December 2000. Participants answered questionnaires and underwent examinations, which included blood pressure, electrocardiogram (ECG), total cholesterol and fasting glucose. The data analysis was performed using SPSS 10.0 for windows. RESULTS: The incidences of complete right bundle branch block (CRBBB) were 1.5 and 2.9% in people older than 40 and 65 years, respectively. Approximately 38.0% of individuals with CRBBB were older than 65 years. The incidence of CRBBB was higher in men than women at all age groups was highest in those aged 75-79 years. Males, advancing age (> or=65 years), hypertension and diabetes mellitus (DM) were associated with an increased risk of CRBBB. The incidences of complete left bundle branch block (LBBB) and bifascicular bundle branch block (BBBB) were 0.1 and 0.08% and 0.3 and 0.2% in those older than 40 and 65 years, respectively. Approximately 71.4 and 58.3% of individuals with LBBB and BBBB, respectively, were older than 65 years. Advancing age and cardiac disease were associated with an increased risk of LBBB. Advancing age was associated with an increased risk of BBBB. The most potent risk factor for BBB in this study was advancing age. CONCLUSION: The incidences of BBB were 1.7 and 3.4% in those older than 40 and 65 years respectively. Bundle branch block correlates strongly with age, and is common in the older ages groups. These findings support the theory that bundle branch block is a marker of slowly progressing degenerative diseases.
Adult
;
Age Factors
;
Bundle-Branch Block/*epidemiology
;
Female
;
Heart Diseases/complications/epidemiology
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Korea/epidemiology
;
Male
;
Risk Factors
;
Sex Factors
2.Impact of Direct Cardiovascular Laboratory Activation by Emergency Physicians on False-Positive Activation Rates.
Julian Ck TAY ; Liou Wei LUN ; Zhong LIANG ; Terrance Sj CHUA ; Swee Han LIM ; Aaron Sl WONG ; Marcus Eh ONG ; Kay Woon HO
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2016;45(8):351-356
INTRODUCTIONDoor-to-balloon (DTB) time is critical to ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients' survival. Although DTB time is reduced with direct cardiovascular laboratory (CVL) activation by emergency physicians, concerns regarding false-positive activation remain. We evaluate false-positive rates before and after direct CVL activation and factors associated with false-positive activations.
MATERIALS AND METHODSThis is a retrospective single centre study of all emergency CVL activation 3 years before and after introduction of direct activation in July 2007. False-positive activation is defined as either: 1) absence of culprit vessel with coronary artery thrombus or ulceration, or 2) presence of chronic total occlusion of culprit vessel, with no cardiac biomarker elevations and no regional wall abnormalities. All false-positive cases were verified by reviewing their coronary angiograms and patient records.
RESULTSA total of 1809 subjects were recruited; 84 (4.64%) identified as false-positives. Incidence of false-positive before and after direct activation was 4.1% and 5.1% respectively, which was not significant (P = 0.315). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, factors associated with false-positive were: female (odds ratio (OR): 2.104 [1.247-3.548], P = 0.005), absence of chest pain (OR: 5.369 [3.024-9.531], P <0.0001) and presence of only left bundle branch block (LBBB) as indication for activation (OR: 65.691 [19.870-217.179], P <0.0001).
CONCLUSIONImprovement in DTB time with direct CVL activation by emergency physicians is not associated with increased false-positive activations. Factors associated with false-positive, especially lack of chest pain or LBBB, can be taken into account to optimise STEMI management.
Bundle-Branch Block ; epidemiology ; Cardiac Catheterization ; Chest Pain ; epidemiology ; Coronary Angiography ; Disease Management ; Emergency Medicine ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Multivariate Analysis ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Physicians ; Retrospective Studies ; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction ; diagnosis ; epidemiology ; therapy ; Sex Factors ; Singapore ; epidemiology ; Time-to-Treatment
3.Risk factors for heart failure in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed myocardial infarction: a matched, case-control study in Iran.
Ali AHMADI ; Koorosh ETEMAD ; Arsalan KHALEDIFAR
Epidemiology and Health 2016;38(1):e2016019-
OBJECTIVES: Risk factors for heart failure (HF) have not yet been studied in myocardial infarction (MI) patients in Iran. This study was conducted to determine these risk factors. METHODS: In this nationwide, hospital-based, case-control study, the participants were all new MI patients hospitalized from April 2012 to March 2013 in Iran. The data on 1,691 new cases with HF (enrolled by census sampling) were compared with the data of 6,764 patients without HF as controls. We randomly selected four controls per one case, matched on the date at MI and HF diagnosis, according to incidence density sampling. Using conditional logistic regression models, odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to identify potential risk factors. RESULTS: The one-year in-hospital mortality rate was 18.2% in the cases and higher than in the controls (12.1%) (p<0.05). Significant risk factors for HF were: right bundle branch block (RBBB) (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.95 to 4.19), stroke (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.39 to 2.89), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.09). Diabetes, hypertension, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, and age were determined to be the factors significantly associated with HF incidence (p<0.05). The most important factor in women was diabetes (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.88). Age, hypertension, PCI, CABG, and RBBB were the most important factors in men. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings may help to better identify and monitor the predictive risk factors for HF in MI patients. The pattern of risk factors was different in men and women.
Atrial Fibrillation
;
Bundle-Branch Block
;
Case-Control Studies*
;
Censuses
;
Cohort Studies*
;
Coronary Artery Bypass
;
Diagnosis
;
Epidemiology
;
Female
;
Heart Failure*
;
Heart*
;
Hospital Mortality
;
Humans
;
Hypertension
;
Incidence
;
Iran*
;
Logistic Models
;
Male
;
Mortality
;
Myocardial Infarction*
;
Odds Ratio
;
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
;
Risk Factors*
;
Stroke
;
Tachycardia, Ventricular