Background: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of Agilent 1100 HPLC analyser using HbA1c kits manufactured by Gordion Diagnostic (Turkey) with that of Premier Hb9210 using the original kits for the measurement of HbA1c in different patient groups. Methods: Subjects were divided into four groups: Group 1 included 140 diabetic and non-diabetic subjects with normal urea and haemoglobin levels; Group 2 included 84 diabetic and non-diabetic subjects with high urea levels; Group 3 included 44 diabetic and non-diabetic subjects with iron deficiency anaemia; and Group 4 included 52 diabetic and non-diabetic subjects with high haemoglobin levels. EP Evaluator Release 8 program was used to evaluate the resultant data. Results: According to the comparison results of the two methods in all groups, there was an excellent correlation between the two methods (R>0.98). Moderate–low correlation was found between increased urea concentration and the difference of the two methods (R= −0.374, p = 0.0005). The difference between the methods was found to be increased with increased urea concentrations. This difference, although statistically significant, was within the permitted limits. The observed correlation between the difference of the two methods and the low and high haemoglobin concentrations was statistically non-significant (R = 0.149, p = 0.3343; R = 0.263, p = 0.0594). Conclusions: We found that Agilent 1100 HbA1c analyser and Gordions’ HbA1c kit comply with the clinical requirements and are suitable for HbA1c analysis at high levels of urea and Hb and low levels of Hb in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

An 18-year old male patient, with a history of paragliding accident, sustaining a coronal shear fracture of the body of the talus, an anterior process fracture of the calcaneus extending to the calcaneocuboid joint and a nondisplaced navicular body fracture at the right foot and a displaced fracture of the navicular body accompanied with posteromedial process fracture of the talus at the left side was referred to our emergency clinic. For the right foot, the coronal plane fracture of the talar body was anatomically reduced and fixed with screws. For the left foot, screw fixation was performed through the lateral aspect to fix the large posteromedial fragment. Small bone fragments were removed from the left navicular fracture, and the main fragments were also fixed with screw. The talo-navicular joint was stabilised with a Kirschner wire. At 36 months follow-up, bilateral foot and ankle functions were satisfactory, Maryland scores of the right and left foot were 85 (good) and 90 (excellent), respectively, and the patient regained his full activity level by the 5th month postoperatively. With reference to the number and types of fractures in this one patient, we present a standard protocol for treatment of isolated talus, navicular and calcaneal fractures presenting together in a single foot injury.